Moffatt v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
Filing
12
ORDER re 11 Request to appear telephonically filed by UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, Unum Group. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/29/11. (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
Case No.: 5:11-cv-02492-LHK-PSG
CHRISTOPHER D. MOFFATT,
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
CMC :
Action Filed :
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF AMERICA, a foreign
insurance company and UNUM
GROUP, a foreign Corporation (d/b/a
Unum Life Insurance Company of
America, Provident Life and Accident
Insurance Company, and The Paul
Revere Life Insurance),
15
16
17
18
09/07/2011
05/23/2011
(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING
JOINT REQUEST BY PARTIES
TO HAVE THEIR COUNSEL TO
PARTICIPATE BY TELEPHONE
AT THE SEPTEMBER 7, 2011
CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Date:
Time:
Ctrm.:
Defendants.
19
20
September 7, 2011
2:00 p.m.
4 – 5th Floor
[Lodged Concurrently With:
Joint Request.]
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BARGER & WOLEN LLP
19800 MACARTHUR BLVD.
EIGHTH FLOOR
IRVINE, CA 92612
(949) 757-2800
0
5:11-cv-02492-LHK-PSG
(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING JOINT REQUEST FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING COUNSEL
TO PARTICIPATE BY TELEPHONE AT THE SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
ORDER
2
3
The Court considered the joint request by Plaintiff Christopher Moffatt and
4 Defendants Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Unum Group’s
5 (collectively, “Defendants”) for an Order permitting their respective counsel to
6 appear telephonically at the September 7, 2011, 2:00 p.m. Case Management
7 Conference. For good cause shown, the request is hereby granted.
8
9
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff’s and Defendants’ counsel may
10 appear telephonically at the Case Management Conference on September 7, 2011,
11 2:00 p.m.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15 DATED: _8/29/11
16
______________________________________
THE HON. LUCY H. KOH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BARGER & WOLEN LLP
19800 MACARTHUR BLVD.
EIGHTH FLOOR
IRVINE, CA 92612
(949) 757-2800
1
5:11-cv-02492-LHK-PSG
(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING JOINT REQUEST FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING COUNSEL
TO PARTICIPATE BY TELEPHONE AT THE SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE
I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age
of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 19800 MacArthur
5 Blvd., Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92612. Email address: grubio@bargerwolen.com.
4
6
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August 19, 2011, I electronically filed the
foregoing (PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING JOINT REQUEST BY
8 PARTIES TO HAVE THEIR COUNSEL TO PARTICIPATE BY
TELEPHONE AT THE SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT
9 CONFERENCE with the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System which provides
for the transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF
10 registrant(s):
7
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Richard H. Friedman, Esq.
FRIEDMAN | RUBIN
1126 Highland Avenue
Bremerton, WA 98337
Tel: (360) 782-4300
Fax: (360) 782-4383
rfriedman@friedmanrubin.com
Charles B. Perkins, Esq.
FLYNN, ROSE AND PERKINS
59 North Santa Cruz Ave., Ste. Q
Los Gatos, CA 95030
Tel: (408) 399-4566
Fax: 408-399-6683
cbperk@earthlink.net
Counsel for Plaintiff
Christopher D. Moffatt
Counsel for Plaintiff
Christopher D. Moffatt
18
19
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and
the United States of America that the above is true and correct. Executed at Irvine,
21 California on August 19, 2011.
20
22
23
24
NAME: Gabriela Rubio
/s/ Gabriela Rubio
An Employee of BARGER & WOLEN LLP
25
26
27
28
BARGER & WOLEN LLP
19800 MACARTHUR BLVD.
EIGHTH FLOOR
IRVINE, CA 92612
(949) 757-2800
2
5:11-cv-02492-LHK-PSG
(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING JOINT REQUEST FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING COUNSEL
TO PARTICIPATE BY TELEPHONE AT THE SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?