In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Filing 1053

ORDER SEALING TRANSCRIPT PORTION. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 3/2/2015. (lhklc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 IN RE: HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE ANTITRUST LITIGATION 13 14 15 16 17 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 11-CV-02509-LHK ORDER SEALING TRANSCRIPT PORTION 18 19 In light of the Court having granted prior administrative motions to file the “blow 20 provision” under seal, ECF Nos. 978, 1052, the Court hereby ORDERS that the specific numeral 21 triggering the blow provision—but not the blow provision’s existence or the numeral’s status as a 22 percentage—be sealed from the transcript of the preliminary approval hearing that took place on 23 March 2, 2015. See In re Online DVD-Rental Antitrust Litig., — F.3d — , No. 12-15705, 2015 24 WL 846008, at *8 (9th Cir. Feb. 27, 2015) (noting that “[o]nly the exact threshold” of an “opt-out 25 provision” that “allows Walmart to opt out if a certain percentage of class members opt out of the 26 settlement” was, “for practical reasons, . . . kept confidential”). 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 1 Case No.: 11-CV-02509-LHK ORDER SEALING TRANSCRIPT PORTION 1 Dated: March 2, 2015 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 11-CV-02509-LHK ORDER SEALING TRANSCRIPT PORTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?