In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation
Filing
1053
ORDER SEALING TRANSCRIPT PORTION. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 3/2/2015. (lhklc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
IN RE: HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
13
14
15
16
17
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
ALL ACTIONS
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 11-CV-02509-LHK
ORDER SEALING TRANSCRIPT
PORTION
18
19
In light of the Court having granted prior administrative motions to file the “blow
20
provision” under seal, ECF Nos. 978, 1052, the Court hereby ORDERS that the specific numeral
21
triggering the blow provision—but not the blow provision’s existence or the numeral’s status as a
22
percentage—be sealed from the transcript of the preliminary approval hearing that took place on
23
March 2, 2015. See In re Online DVD-Rental Antitrust Litig., — F.3d — , No. 12-15705, 2015
24
WL 846008, at *8 (9th Cir. Feb. 27, 2015) (noting that “[o]nly the exact threshold” of an “opt-out
25
provision” that “allows Walmart to opt out if a certain percentage of class members opt out of the
26
settlement” was, “for practical reasons, . . . kept confidential”).
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
28
1
Case No.: 11-CV-02509-LHK
ORDER SEALING TRANSCRIPT PORTION
1
Dated: March 2, 2015
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 11-CV-02509-LHK
ORDER SEALING TRANSCRIPT PORTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?