In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Filing 1113

FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 9/2/2015. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2015) **THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE CASE FILES** Modified on 9/3/2015 (sms, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 IN RE: HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE ANTITRUST LITIGATION 13 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL 14 ALL ACTIONS 15 16 The Court hereby enters final judgment in this action as between Plaintiffs and the Class 17 18 and Defendants Adobe Systems, Incorporated, Apple Inc., Google Inc., and Intel Corporation 19 (“Defendants”), as defined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a). Pursuant to this Final 20 Judgment: 1. 21 22 All Released Claims of Plaintiffs and the Class are hereby released as against Defendants and all other Released Parties as defined in the Settlement. 2. 23 The Court finds that the Class Members who have exercised their right to exclude 24 themselves from this Action, by submitting timely requests for exclusion pursuant to the notice 25 mailed to the Class, are not included in or bound by this order and final judgment. The excluded 26 Class Members are listed in Exhibit A to the proposed final judgment filed on June 15, 2015. See 27 ECF No. 1088-1. 28 1261641.1 -1- [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL MASTER DOCKET NO. 11-CV-2509-LHK 1 3. Without affecting the finality of the Court’s judgment in any way, the Court 2 retains jurisdiction over this matter for purposes of resolving issues relating to the interpretation, 3 administration, implementation, effectuation, and enforcement of the Settlement. 4 5 4. terms of the Settlement. 6 7 5. This action is dismissed with prejudice as against the Defendants, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees except as provided by the Settlement and the Court’s orders. 8 9 The parties and the Notice Administrator are hereby ordered to comply with the 6. This document constitutes a final judgment and separate document for purposes of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a). 10 7. The Court finds, pursuant to Rules 54(a) and (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 11 Procedure, that this Final Judgment should be entered and that there is no just reason for delay in 12 the entry of this Final Judgment as to Plaintiffs and the Class and Defendants. Accordingly, the 13 Clerk is hereby directed to enter Judgment forthwith. 14 15 8. The Clerk shall close the following case files: 11-CV-02509-LHK; 11-CV-03538- LHK; 11-CV-03539-LHK; 11-CV-03540-LHK; 11-CV-03541-LHK. 16 17 Dated: September 2, 2015 LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1261641.1 -2- [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL MASTER DOCKET NO. 11-CV-2509-LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?