In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation
Filing
1113
FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 9/2/2015. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2015) **THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE CASE FILES** Modified on 9/3/2015 (sms, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
IN RE: HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
13
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND
DISMISSAL
14
ALL ACTIONS
15
16
The Court hereby enters final judgment in this action as between Plaintiffs and the Class
17
18
and Defendants Adobe Systems, Incorporated, Apple Inc., Google Inc., and Intel Corporation
19
(“Defendants”), as defined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a). Pursuant to this Final
20
Judgment:
1.
21
22
All Released Claims of Plaintiffs and the Class are hereby released as against
Defendants and all other Released Parties as defined in the Settlement.
2.
23
The Court finds that the Class Members who have exercised their right to exclude
24
themselves from this Action, by submitting timely requests for exclusion pursuant to the notice
25
mailed to the Class, are not included in or bound by this order and final judgment. The excluded
26
Class Members are listed in Exhibit A to the proposed final judgment filed on June 15, 2015. See
27
ECF No. 1088-1.
28
1261641.1
-1-
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL
MASTER DOCKET NO. 11-CV-2509-LHK
1
3.
Without affecting the finality of the Court’s judgment in any way, the Court
2
retains jurisdiction over this matter for purposes of resolving issues relating to the interpretation,
3
administration, implementation, effectuation, and enforcement of the Settlement.
4
5
4.
terms of the Settlement.
6
7
5.
This action is dismissed with prejudice as against the Defendants, each side to bear
its own costs and attorneys’ fees except as provided by the Settlement and the Court’s orders.
8
9
The parties and the Notice Administrator are hereby ordered to comply with the
6.
This document constitutes a final judgment and separate document for purposes of
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a).
10
7.
The Court finds, pursuant to Rules 54(a) and (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
11
Procedure, that this Final Judgment should be entered and that there is no just reason for delay in
12
the entry of this Final Judgment as to Plaintiffs and the Class and Defendants. Accordingly, the
13
Clerk is hereby directed to enter Judgment forthwith.
14
15
8.
The Clerk shall close the following case files: 11-CV-02509-LHK; 11-CV-03538-
LHK; 11-CV-03539-LHK; 11-CV-03540-LHK; 11-CV-03541-LHK.
16
17
Dated: September 2, 2015
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1261641.1
-2-
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL
MASTER DOCKET NO. 11-CV-2509-LHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?