In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Filing 140

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh denying (137) Motion for Extension of Time to File in case 5:11-cv-02509-LHK. Associated Cases: 5:11-cv-02509-LHK, 5:11-cv-03538-LHK, 5:11-cv-03539-LHK, 5:11-cv-03540-LHK, 5:11-cv-03541-LHK, 5:12-cv-01262-LHK(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 IN RE HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE ANTITRUST LITIGATION Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK 13 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 14 ALL ACTIONS ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 11 12 15 16 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to extend the time to file their class certification 17 motion from June 28, 2012, to October 26, 2012. ECF No. 137. Plaintiffs have failed to show 18 good cause for a four-month extension on the deadline to file their class certification motion. 19 Accordingly, the motion is DENIED. A case management conference is set for June 4, 2012, at 20 2:30 p.m. By 12:00 p.m. on June 1, 2012, the parties shall file their joint case management 21 conference statement. The case management conference set for July 25, 2012, is hereby 22 VACATED. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: May 29, 2012 25 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 26 27 28 Case No.: 11-CV-2509-LHK ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?