In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation
Filing
147
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting (144) Motion to Amend/Correct. Associated Cases: 5:11-cv-02509-LHK, 5:11-cv-03538-LHK, 5:11-cv-03539-LHK, 5:11-cv-03540-LHK, 5:11-cv-03541-LHK, 5:12-cv-01262-LHK(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2012)
Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document144-1 Filed06/03/12 Page2 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Richard M. Heimann (State Bar No. 63607)
Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716)
Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260)
Brendan Glackin (State Bar No. 199643)
Dean Harvey (State Bar No. 250298)
Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. 255928)
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3339
Telephone: 415.956.1000
Facsimile: 415.956.1008
Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064)
SAVERI LAW FIRM
255 California, Suite 450
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: 415.500.6800
Facsimile: 415.500.6803
10
11
Proposed Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiff Class
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN JOSE DIVISION
16
17
18
19
IN RE: HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
AMEND PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 1______
All Actions
20
After consideration of the unopposed motion submitted by Plaintiffs, and the papers on
21
22
file herein, the Court orders that Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Amend Pretrial Order No. 1 is
23
granted. The Court hereby jointly appoints Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP and
24
Saveri Law Firm as Interim Co-lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Plaintiff Class.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
June 4, 2012
Dated: ______________
27
_______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
28
1041154.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
MASTER DOCKET NO. 11-CV-2509-LHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?