In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Filing 176

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting (175) Stipulation in case 5:11-cv-02509-LHK. Associated Cases: 5:11-cv-02509-LHK, 5:11-cv-03538-LHK, 5:11-cv-03539-LHK, 5:11-cv-03540-LHK, 5:11-cv-03541-LHK, 5:12-cv-01262-LHK(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2012)

Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document175 Filed07/09/12 Page1 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Richard M. Heimann (State Bar No. 63607)
Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716)
Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260)
Brendan P. Glackin (State Bar No. 199643)
Dean M. Harvey (State Bar No. 250298)
Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. 255928)
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064)
JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM
255 California, Suite 450
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed
Class

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN JOSE DIVISION

16
17
18
19

IN RE: HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

20

ALL ACTIONS

Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULE
AS MODIFIED

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1046831.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK

Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document175 Filed07/09/12 Page2 of 6
1
2

ALL PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE:
Pursuant to the Court’s July 2, 2012 Order re Case Schedule (Dkt. No. 165), counsel for

3
4

all parties have conferred and propose the following extensions of the case schedule:

5
6

EVENT

CURRENT

PROPOSED

7

Motion for Class Certification

July 19, 2012

September 17, 2012

Opposition to Motion for Class
Certification

August 30, 2012

October 29, 2012

Reply In Support of Class
Certification

September 20, 2012

November 26, 2012

13

Hearing on Motion for Class
Certification

October 11, 2012

December 13, 20121

14

Fact Discovery Cutoff

November 30, 2012

January 29, 2013

Opening Expert Reports

December 14, 2012

February 12, 2013

Opposition Expert Reports

January 4, 2013

March 5, 2013

Expert Discovery Cutoff

January 25, 2013

March 26, 2013

Dispositive Motions and Daubert
Motions

February 7, 2013

April 11, 2013

8
9
10
11
12

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Oppositions to Dispositive and
Daubert Motions

May 10, 2013

Replies to Dispositive and Daubert
Motions

May 31, 2013

26
27
28

1

Plaintiffs’ counsel are available on December 20, 2012, but Defendants’ counsel are not.
Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ counsel are available on December 13, 2012.

1046831.4

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK

Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document175 Filed07/09/12 Page3 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

EVENT

CURRENT

PROPOSED

Hearing on Dispositive Motions and
Daubert Motions

March 14, 2013

June 20, 2013

Pretrial Conference

May 15, 2013

July 31, 2013 or
August 21, 20132

Jury Trial Begins

June 10, 2013

August 27, 2013 or
November 11, 20133

8
9
10
11
12

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:
Dated: July 9, 2012

LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
By:

13
14

/s/ Kelly M. Dermody
Kelly M. Dermody

Richard M. Heimann (State Bar No. 63607)
Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716)
Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260)
Brendan P. Glackin (State Bar No. 199643)
Dean M. Harvey (State Bar No. 250298)
Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. 255928)
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

The parties have agreed to the revised schedule with the exception of the trial date (see n.3).
The pre-trial conference dates reflect these separate proposed trial dates.
3
Plaintiffs request a November 11, 2013 trial date in order to accommodate a pre-existing
conflict that several of Plaintiffs’ Counsel have with another trial set to commence on September
9, 2013 and run through early October 2013 in In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust Litigation, No.
10-CV-00318 (RDB) (D. Md.). Present Interim Co-Lead Counsel Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP and Joseph Saveri of the Joseph Saveri Law firm are also Interim Co-Lead
Counsel in Titanium Dioxide, and Mr. Saveri will serve as co-lead trial counsel in Titanium
Dioxide. The Berger & Montague firm, Plaintiffs’ co-counsel here, are also Court-appointed
Executive Committee members in the Titanium Dioxide case and will be serving on the trial team.
The Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A. firm, also serves as Plaintiffs' co-counsel here and on the Executive
Committee in Titanium Dioxide.
Defendants propose a trial date in August 2013 in light of the Court’s order granting a two-month
extension and requesting a revised schedule which extends all deadlines correspondingly (Dkt.
No. 165).
1046831.4

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK

Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document175 Filed07/09/12 Page4 of 6
1
2

Dated: July 9, 2012

3

By:

4

/s/ Joseph R. Saveri
Joseph R. Saveri

Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064)
JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM
255 California, Suite 450
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.500.6803

5
6
7
8

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed
Class

9
10

JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM

Dated: July 9, 2012

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
By:

11
12

/s/ Michael F. Tubach
Michael F. Tubach

Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.

13
14

Dated: July 9, 2012

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
By:

15
16

/s/ Daniel Purcell
Daniel Purcell

Attorneys for Defendant Lucasfilm Ltd.

17
18

Dated: July 9, 2012

JONES DAY
By:

19
20

/s/ David C. Kiernan
David C. Kiernan

Attorneys for Defendant Adobe Systems Inc.

21
22

Dated: July 9, 2012

MAYER BROWN LLP
By:

23
24

/s/ Lee H. Rubin
Lee H. Rubin

Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.

25
26

Dated: July 9, 2012

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP
By:

27
28

/s/ Frank Hinman
Frank Hinman

Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corp.

1046831.4

-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK

Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document175 Filed07/09/12 Page5 of 6
1
2
3

Dated: July 9, 2012

JONES DAY
By:

4

/s/ Robert A. Mittelstaedt
Robert A. Mittelstaedt

Attorneys for Defendant Intuit Inc.

5
6
7

Dated: July 9, 2012

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
By:

8
9

/s/ Emily Johnson Henn
Emily Johnson Henn

Attorneys for Defendant Pixar

10
11

Filer’s Attestation

12
13
14

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in
the filing of the document has been obtained from all the signatories.

15
16

Dated: July 9, 2012

/s/ Dean M. Harvey
Dean M. Harvey

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1046831.4

-4-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK

Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document175 Filed07/09/12 Page6 of 6
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3
4
5
6

July 10,
Dated: ________________. 2012
By:
Honorable
United

______________________________
Lucy H. Koh
Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1046831.4

-5-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK