In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Filing 359

ORDER RE: REDACTIONS FOR LACK OF RELEVANCE AND/OR RESPONSIVENESS. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on March 15, 2013. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 IN RE HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE ANTITRUST LITIGATION 13 14 15 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS ) ) Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK ) ) ORDER RE: REDACTIONS FOR LACK OF ) RELEVANCE AND/OR RESPONSIVENESS ) ) ) ) 16 On March 14, 2013, Defendants submitted statements regarding the number of documents 17 18 each Defendant has redacted based on lack of relevance and/or responsiveness. The Court will not 19 permit Defendants to redact information based on Defendants’ unilateral assessment of lack of 20 relevance and/or responsiveness. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that all Defendants 21 produce any documents that they have redacted for lack of relevance and/or responsiveness in their 22 un-redacted form1 by March 19, 2013. The parties may meet and confer to agree upon the 23 redaction of these documents for public filings or use at a hearing or at trial. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: March 15, 2013 26 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 27 1 28 With the exception of redactions for privilege and/or redactions to protect the private information of non-parties. 1 Case No.: 5:11-CV-02509-LHK ORDER RE: REDACTIONS FOR LACK OF RELEVANCE AND/OR RESPONSIVENESS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?