In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Filing 359

ORDER RE: REDACTIONS FOR LACK OF RELEVANCE AND/OR RESPONSIVENESS. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on March 15, 2013. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

IN RE HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

13
14
15

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
ALL ACTIONS

)
) Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK
)
) ORDER RE: REDACTIONS FOR LACK OF
) RELEVANCE AND/OR RESPONSIVENESS
)
)
)
)

16
On March 14, 2013, Defendants submitted statements regarding the number of documents

17
18

each Defendant has redacted based on lack of relevance and/or responsiveness. The Court will not

19

permit Defendants to redact information based on Defendants’ unilateral assessment of lack of

20

relevance and/or responsiveness. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that all Defendants

21

produce any documents that they have redacted for lack of relevance and/or responsiveness in their

22

un-redacted form1 by March 19, 2013. The parties may meet and confer to agree upon the

23

redaction of these documents for public filings or use at a hearing or at trial.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: March 15, 2013

26

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

27
1

28

With the exception of redactions for privilege and/or redactions to protect the private information
of non-parties.
1
Case No.: 5:11-CV-02509-LHK
ORDER RE: REDACTIONS FOR LACK OF RELEVANCE AND/OR RESPONSIVENESS