In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation
ORDER RE: REDACTIONS FOR LACK OF RELEVANCE AND/OR RESPONSIVENESS. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on March 15, 2013. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
IN RE HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
) Master Docket No. 11-CV-2509-LHK
) ORDER RE: REDACTIONS FOR LACK OF
) RELEVANCE AND/OR RESPONSIVENESS
On March 14, 2013, Defendants submitted statements regarding the number of documents
each Defendant has redacted based on lack of relevance and/or responsiveness. The Court will not
permit Defendants to redact information based on Defendants’ unilateral assessment of lack of
relevance and/or responsiveness. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that all Defendants
produce any documents that they have redacted for lack of relevance and/or responsiveness in their
un-redacted form1 by March 19, 2013. The parties may meet and confer to agree upon the
redaction of these documents for public filings or use at a hearing or at trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 15, 2013
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
With the exception of redactions for privilege and/or redactions to protect the private information
Case No.: 5:11-CV-02509-LHK
ORDER RE: REDACTIONS FOR LACK OF RELEVANCE AND/OR RESPONSIVENESS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?