In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Filing 373

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting #343 Motion for Leave to File Recent Decision.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
JOHN KEKER - # 49092
[e-mail]
DANIEL PURCELL - # 191424
[e-mail]
EUGENE M. PAIGE - # 202849
[e-mail]
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone:
415 391 5400
Facsimile:
415 397 7188
Attorneys for Defendant
LUCASFILM LTD.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12

IN RE: HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Case No. 3:11-cv-2509-LHK

14

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION

15

ALL ACTIONS

13

Judge:

Hon. Lucy H. Koh

16
17

Date Consol. Amended Compl. Filed:
September 13, 2011

18

Trial Date: November 12, 2013

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
Case No. 3:11-cv-2509-LHK
733651.01

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Pursuant to Local Civil Rules 7-11 and 7-12, Plaintiffs and Defendants jointly submit this
Stipulation and Proposed Order allowing Defendants to file a Statement of Recent Decision.
WHEREAS Defendants wish to file a Statement of Recent Decision in order to bring the
recent Ninth Circuit decision Wang v. Chinese Daily News, Inc. to the Court’s attention.
WHEREAS Plaintiffs do not stipulate that the Wang decision is relevant, Plaintiffs also do
not oppose the filing of Defendants’ Statement of Recent Decision.
Therefore, subject to the approval of this Court, Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate
and agree to the filing of Defendants’ Statement of Recent Decision.

9
10

Dated: March 8, 2013

11

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
By: /s/ Kelly M. Dermody
Kelly M. Dermody

12

17

Richard M. Heimann (State Bar No. 63607)
Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716)
Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260)
Brendan Glackin (State Bar No. 199643)
Dean Harvey (State Bar No. 250298)
Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. 255928)
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3339
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.956.1008

18

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiff Class

13
14
15
16

19

Dated: March 8, 2013

JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

By: /s/ Joseph R. Saveri
Joseph R. Saveri
Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064)
Lisa J. Leebove (State Bar No. 186705)
James G. Dallal (State Bar No. 277826)
JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM
255 California, Suite 450
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415. 500.6803
Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiff Class

28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
Case No. 3:11-cv-2509-LHK
733651.01

1

Dated: March 8, 2013

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

2
By: /s/ Michael F. Tubach
Michael F. Tubach

3
4

7

George Riley
Michael F. Tubach
Christina J. Brown
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8

Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC.

5
6

9

Dated: March 8, 2013

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

10
By: /s/ Justina K. Sessions
Justina K. Sessions

11
12

John W. Keker
Daniel Purcell
Eugene M. Page
Justina K. Sessions
710 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendant LUCASFILM LTD.
17
Dated: March 8, 2013

JONES DAY

18
19

By: /s/ David C. Kiernan
David C. Kiernan

20
21
22
23

Robert A. Mittelstaedt
Craig A. Waldman
David C. Kiernan
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

24
Attorneys for Defendant ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC.
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
Case No. 3:11-cv-2509-LHK
733651.01

1

Dated: March 8, 2013

JONES DAY

2
By: /s/ Robert A. Mittelstaedt
Robert A. Mittelstaedt

3
4

Robert A. Mittelstaedt
Craig E. Stewart
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6
7

Catherine T. Zeng
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9
10

Attorneys for Defendant INTUIT INC.
11
Dated: March 8, 2013

MAYER BROWN LLP

12
13

By: /s/ Lee H. Rubin
Lee H. Rubin

14

18

Lee H. Rubin
Edward D. Johnson
Donald M. Falk
Two Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 300
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

19

Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC.

15
16
17

20

Dated: March 8, 2013

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

21
22
23
24
25

By: /s/ Frank M. Hinman
Frank M. Hinman
Donn P. Pickett
Frank M. Hinman
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

26
Attorneys for Defendant INTEL CORPORATION
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
Case No. 3:11-cv-2509-LHK
733651.01

1

Dated: March 8, 2013

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

2
By: /s/ Emily Johnson Henn
Emily Johnson Henn

3
4

6

Robert T. Haslam, III
Emily Johnson Henn
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700
Redwood City, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]

7

Attorneys for Defendant PIXAR

5

8
9

ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories.

10
11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 29, 2013

By:
HON. LUCY H. KOH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
Case No. 3:11-cv-2509-LHK
733651.01