In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Filing 612

Order Expediting Briefing on #601 Administrative Motion to Enforce December 18, 2013 Case Management Order and Local Rule 7-11. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 02/10/2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

IN RE: HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

12
13
14

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

15

ALL ACTIONS

16
17

)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 11-CV-02509-LHK

ORDER EXPEDITING BRIEFING ON
MOTION TO ENFORCE

)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiffs have filed an Administrative Motion to Enforce this Court’s Case Management

18

Order. See ECF No. 601. In their motion, Plaintiffs contend that Defendants exceeded the 25-page

19

limit for Daubert motions by filing a Motion to Exclude Dr. Leamer (15 pages), a Motion to Strike

20

Improper Rebuttal Testimony in Dr. Leamer’s Expert Report (10 pages), and a Motion to Exclude

21

Expert Testimony of Dr. Marx (10 pages). See id. at 2. The critical issue is whether the Motion to

22

Strike should be counted as part of the page limits for the Daubert briefing.

23

The Court ORDERS Defendants to file a two-page response to Plaintiffs’ motion by

24

February 14, 2014, at 5 p.m. No reply shall be entertained. The Court will resolve this motion at

25

the case management conference set for February 19, 2014, at 2 p.m.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27

Dated: February 10, 2014

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

28
1

Case No.: 11-CV-02509-LHK
ORDER EXPEDITING BRIEFING ON MOTION TO ENFORCE