In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Filing 69

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting in part and denying in part #66 Motion for Leave to File.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)

1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
IN RE: HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master Docket No. C 11-02509 LHK

6
7

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

8

ALL ACTIONS

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN
PART AND DENYING IN PART
DEFENDANT LUCASFILM LTD.’S
MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
RELIEF REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE
A SEPARATE MOTION TO DISMISS

9
10
11

AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT

12

Courtroom: 8, 4th Floor
Judge:
Hon. Lucy H. Koh

13
Date Comp. Filed:
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Master Docket No. C 11-02509 LHK

May 4, 2011

1

Defendant Lucasfilm Ltd. (“Lucasfilm”) has filed a motion for administrative relief under

2

Northern District Civil Local Rule 7-11 requesting leave to file a separate motion to dismiss

3

plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint (“Complaint”). For the reasons stated in

4

Lucasfilm’s motion, and good cause having been shown, the Court GRANTS the motion, in part,

5

and denies it in part.

6

Lucasfilm may file a separate motion to dismiss of no longer than 5 pages, addressing the

7

viability of plaintiffs’ Cartwright Act and UCL claims under the federal enclave doctrine.

8

Plaintiffs may file an opposition brief of no longer than 5 pages, and Lucasfilm may file a reply

9

brief of no longer than 3 pages. The motion shall be briefed on the existing schedule set forth in

10

the Court’s September 12, 2011 pretrial order.

11
12

Dated: September 28, 2011

13
14
15

______________________________________
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S

RT

H

ER

R NIA

cy H. K

oh

FO

NO

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C 11-02509 LHK

u
J u d ge L

A

28

ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
DIFIED
AS MO

LI

UNIT
ED

27

RT
U
O

26

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C