Andrews v. Aurelio et al
Filing
83
Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding. Settled. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 7/25/14. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DAVID RAYMOND ANDREWS,
Case No. 11-cv-02526-LHK (NJV)
Plaintiff,
8
v.
REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER
EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING
9
10
J. AURELIO, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
A further settlement conference was held on July 23, 2014 by video conference, and the
results of that proceeding are indicated below:
(1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the
16
proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority:
17
(X ) Plaintiff, Pro Se
18
( ) Warden or warden’s representative
19
(X) Office of the California Attorney General, Donn Robert Duncan
20
( X ) Other: Patricia Lee for California Department of Corrections and Rehabiliation
21
(2) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives did not appear:
22
_____________________________________________________________________
23
(3) The outcome of the proceeding was:
24
(X ) The case has been completely settled. A telephonic status hearing is scheduled
25
for August 26, 2014. Defense counsel shall facilitate plaintiff's phone appearance. Telephonic
26
appearance information shall be provided to Defense counsel by email.
27
28
( ) The case has been partially resolved and counsel for defendants shall file a joint
stipulation regarding those claims which have been resolved. The issues outlined on the sheet
1
2
3
4
5
6
attached remain for this Court to resolve.
( ) The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 25, 2014
______________________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?