Press Rentals, Inc v. Genesis Fluid Solutions, LTD et al
Filing
132
JUDGMENT. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court shall close the file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/16/2014. (ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2014)
Case5:11-cv-02579-EJD Document128 Filed01/14/14 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
WALLACE M. TICE, ESQ. (SBN 88177)
RANDEL J. CAMPBELL, ESQ. (SBN 209324)
LYNCH, GILARDI & GRUMMER
A Professional Corporation
170 Columbus Avenue, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94133
wtice@lgglaw.com
rcampbell@lgglaw.com
Telephone:
(415) 397-2800
Facsimile:
(415) 397-0937
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PRESS RENTALS, INC., fka
EAGLE NORTH AMERICA, INC.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
PRESS RENTALS, INC., fka EAGLE
NORTH AMERICA, INC., a South
Carolina corporation,
15
16
17
ASSIGNED TO:
THE HONORABLE EDWARD J. DAVILA
Plaintiff(s),
13
14
Case No: 5:11-cv-02579-EJD
vs.
GENESIS FLUID SOLUTIONS, LTD., a
Colorado corporation; MICHAEL K.
HODGES, an individual,
Defendant(s).
[PROPOSED]
JUDGMENT AFTER ORDER
GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN
PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
Case Filed:
Trial Date:
5/27/2011
Not set
18
19
The motion of Plaintiff PRESS RENTALS, INC., fka EAGLE NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
20
21
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT came on for hearing on July 23, 2013. The Court found
22
these matters appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7–1(b),
23
and vacated the hearing date (Docket Item No. 126). The Court has jurisdiction over this action
24
Lynch, Gilardi
& Grummer
A Professional
Corporation
170 Columbus Ave.
5th Floor
San Francisco, CA
94133
Ph (415) 397-2800
Fax (415) 397-0937
FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FRCP RULE 56
under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1367. Having fully reviewed the parties’ papers, the Court issued an
25
order dated January 3, 2014, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Plaintiff’s Motion
26
for Judgment on the Pleadings. (Docket Item No. 127).
27
28
ACCORDINGLY, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff PRESS RENTALS,
INC., fka EAGLE NORTH AMERICA, INC. (“Plaintiff”), and against Defendants GENESIS
CASE NO 5:11-CV-02579-EJD
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AFTER ORDER
Page 1
Case5:11-cv-02579-EJD Document128 Filed01/14/14 Page2 of 2
1
FLUID SOLUTIONS, LTD. (“Genesis”), and MICHAEL K. HODGES (collectively,
2
“Defendants”), jointly and severally, as follows:
3
1. Defendants must pay Plaintiff the balance due on the principal sum in the amount of
4
$50,799.97, which is the principal sum of $152,000.00 less payments made by Genesis
5
of $101,200.03.
6
2. Defendants must pay plaintiff pre-judgment interest at the statutory rate of 10% per
7
annum from June 26, 2009 to the date of Judgment being entered, which accrued amount
8
is $23,145.30 through January 14, 2014 (based on 1663 days at $13.9178/day).
9
3. Defendants must pay Plaintiff post-judgment interest at the statutory rate of 10% per
10
annum from the date Judgment becomes entered until such time as the Judgment is
11
satisfied, which shall accrue at $20.2590 per day (based on judgment of principal plus
12
pre-judgment interest totaling $73,945.27).
13
4. Plaintiff is awarded costs and attorney’s fees incurred after June 26, 2009 that were
14
expended or incurred in enforcing the Settlement Agreement, subject to submission of a
15
Bill of Costs and/or Motion for Attorney’s fees submitted after this entry of Judgment
16
pursuant to the local rules of this court.
17
18
The Clerk shall close this file.
DATED:
April 16, 2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
Northern District of California
San Jose Division
19
20
21
R:\0495-0004\MTN\249731.DOC
22
23
24
Lynch, Gilardi
& Grummer
A Professional
Corporation
170 Columbus Ave.
5th Floor
San Francisco, CA
94133
Ph (415) 397-2800
Fax (415) 397-0937
25
26
27
28
CASE NO 5:11-CV-02579-EJD
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AFTER ORDER
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?