Press Rentals, Inc v. Genesis Fluid Solutions, LTD et al

Filing 132

JUDGMENT. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court shall close the file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/16/2014. (ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2014)

Download PDF
Case5:11-cv-02579-EJD Document128 Filed01/14/14 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 WALLACE M. TICE, ESQ. (SBN 88177) RANDEL J. CAMPBELL, ESQ. (SBN 209324) LYNCH, GILARDI & GRUMMER A Professional Corporation 170 Columbus Avenue, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94133 wtice@lgglaw.com rcampbell@lgglaw.com Telephone: (415) 397-2800 Facsimile: (415) 397-0937 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff PRESS RENTALS, INC., fka EAGLE NORTH AMERICA, INC. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 PRESS RENTALS, INC., fka EAGLE NORTH AMERICA, INC., a South Carolina corporation, 15 16 17 ASSIGNED TO: THE HONORABLE EDWARD J. DAVILA Plaintiff(s), 13 14 Case No: 5:11-cv-02579-EJD vs. GENESIS FLUID SOLUTIONS, LTD., a Colorado corporation; MICHAEL K. HODGES, an individual, Defendant(s). [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AFTER ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Case Filed: Trial Date: 5/27/2011 Not set 18 19 The motion of Plaintiff PRESS RENTALS, INC., fka EAGLE NORTH AMERICA, INC., 20 21 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT came on for hearing on July 23, 2013. The Court found 22 these matters appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7–1(b), 23 and vacated the hearing date (Docket Item No. 126). The Court has jurisdiction over this action 24 Lynch, Gilardi & Grummer A Professional Corporation 170 Columbus Ave. 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94133 Ph (415) 397-2800 Fax (415) 397-0937 FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FRCP RULE 56 under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1367. Having fully reviewed the parties’ papers, the Court issued an 25 order dated January 3, 2014, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Plaintiff’s Motion 26 for Judgment on the Pleadings. (Docket Item No. 127). 27 28 ACCORDINGLY, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff PRESS RENTALS, INC., fka EAGLE NORTH AMERICA, INC. (“Plaintiff”), and against Defendants GENESIS CASE NO 5:11-CV-02579-EJD [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AFTER ORDER Page 1 Case5:11-cv-02579-EJD Document128 Filed01/14/14 Page2 of 2 1 FLUID SOLUTIONS, LTD. (“Genesis”), and MICHAEL K. HODGES (collectively, 2 “Defendants”), jointly and severally, as follows: 3 1. Defendants must pay Plaintiff the balance due on the principal sum in the amount of 4 $50,799.97, which is the principal sum of $152,000.00 less payments made by Genesis 5 of $101,200.03. 6 2. Defendants must pay plaintiff pre-judgment interest at the statutory rate of 10% per 7 annum from June 26, 2009 to the date of Judgment being entered, which accrued amount 8 is $23,145.30 through January 14, 2014 (based on 1663 days at $13.9178/day). 9 3. Defendants must pay Plaintiff post-judgment interest at the statutory rate of 10% per 10 annum from the date Judgment becomes entered until such time as the Judgment is 11 satisfied, which shall accrue at $20.2590 per day (based on judgment of principal plus 12 pre-judgment interest totaling $73,945.27). 13 4. Plaintiff is awarded costs and attorney’s fees incurred after June 26, 2009 that were 14 expended or incurred in enforcing the Settlement Agreement, subject to submission of a 15 Bill of Costs and/or Motion for Attorney’s fees submitted after this entry of Judgment 16 pursuant to the local rules of this court. 17 18 The Clerk shall close this file. DATED: April 16, 2014 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge Northern District of California San Jose Division 19 20 21 R:\0495-0004\MTN\249731.DOC 22 23 24 Lynch, Gilardi & Grummer A Professional Corporation 170 Columbus Ave. 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94133 Ph (415) 397-2800 Fax (415) 397-0937 25 26 27 28 CASE NO 5:11-CV-02579-EJD [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AFTER ORDER Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?