Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Inc v. East Charleston, Inc et al

Filing 281

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 280 Stipulation Mutually Dismissing Great American and ECI/PAMCO's Claims with Prejudice.(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2013)

Download PDF
Case5:11-cv-02587-LHK Document280 Filed06/27/13 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 GREBEN & ASSOCIATES 125 E. DE LA GUERRA ST., STE 203 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101 TEL: 805-963-9090 FAX: 805-963-9098 Jan A. Greben, SBN 103464 jan@grebenlaw.com Brett A. Boon, SBN 283225 brett@grebenlaw.com Attorneys for Defendants EAST CHARLESTON, INC. and PACIFIC AMERICAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, INC., a Texas Corporation; Plaintiff, 13 14 v. 16 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MUTUALLY DISMISSING GREAT AMERICAN AND ECI/PAMCO’S CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE EAST CHARLESTON, INC., a California Corporation, and PACIFIC AMERICAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a California Limited Liability Corporation; 17 Case No.: 5:11-CV-02587-LHK Defendants. 15 18 19 RELATED CROSS AND COUNTER-CLAIMS 20 21 22 23 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 -1STIPULATED DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 5:11-CV-02587-LHK Case5:11-cv-02587-LHK Document280 Filed06/27/13 Page2 of 3 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Defendants and Counterclaimants East 2 Charleston, Inc. and Pacific American Management Company (“ECI/PAMCO”) and Third Party 3 Defendant Advalloy, Inc., by and through Intervenor Great American Insurance Company of New 4 York (“Great American”), through their respective counsel of record (collectively, the “Parties”): 5 Pursuant to the Court's Status Conference Order of June 25, 2013 (Document No. 271) and 6 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2) and (c), the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as 7 follows: 8 1. Great American and ECI/PAMCO hereby mutually dismiss all of their respective claims pled 9 in the above captioned case against each other WITH PREJUDICE; and 10 2. Each Party, Great American and ECI/PAMCO, will bear its own costs, attorney's fees and 11 expenses. 12 13 Dated: June 27, 2013 14 GREBEN & ASSOCIATES /s/ Jan A. Greben Jan A. Greben Brett A. Boon Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants EAST CHARLESTON, INC., a California Corporation, and PACIFIC AMERICAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a California Limited Liability Corporation 15 16 17 18 19 20 Dated: June 27, 2013 WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN, LLP 21 /s/ Emil A. Macasinag DAVID F. WOOD EMIL A. MACASINAG JON-ERIK W. MAGUNS Attorneys for Intervenor Third-Party Defendant Advalloy, Inc. by and through Intervenor Great American Insurance Company of New York 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// -2STIPULATED DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 5:11-CV-02587-LHK Case5:11-cv-02587-LHK Document280 Filed06/27/13 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [PROPOSED] ORDER The Parties having stipulated and agreed, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Great American’s claims against ECI/PAMCO, as set forth in the pleadings in the above-referenced case, are hereby dismissed WITH prejudice; 2. ECI/PAMCO's claims against Great American, as set forth in the pleadings in the above-referenced case, are hereby dismissed WITH prejudice; and 3. Each party shall bear its own costs, attorney's fees and expenses. 11 12 Date: June 27, 2013 13 14 HON. LUCY H. KOH, JUDGE FOR THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATED DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 5:11-CV-02587-LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?