Unite Here! Local 19 v. Sutter's Place, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER by Judge Whyte denying 14 Motion to Continue (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 E-FILED on 7/28/2011 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 UNITE HERE! LOCAL 19, 13 14 No. C-11-02608 RMW Petitioner, v. 15 SUTTER'S PLACE, INC., dba BAY 101 16 Respondent. ORDER DENYING SUTTER'S PLACE, INC. dba BAY 101'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE OF PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND TO SET A BRIEFING SCHEDULE 17 [Re Docket No. 14] 18 19 20 21 22 23 On July 19, 2011, respondent Sutter's Place, Inc. dba Bay 101 ("Bay 101") brought an administrative motion to continue the hearing date of petitioner's motion for summary judgment and motion for attorney's fees and to set a briefing schedule. Dkt. No. 14. Petitioner Unite Here! Local 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING SUTTER'S PLACE, INC. dba BAY 101'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE OF PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND TO SET A BRIEFING SCHEDULE—No. C-11-02608 RMW JLR 1 19 ("Local 19") opposed the motion. Dkt. No. 15. Having considered the papers submitted by the 2 parties, the court denies Bay 101's motion. A continuance is not warranted at this time. 3 4 5 6 7 DATED: 7/28/2011 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING SUTTER'S PLACE, INC. dba BAY 101'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE OF PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND TO SET A BRIEFING SCHEDULE—No. C-11-02608 RMW JLR 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?