Santos v. LVNV Funding, LLC et al

Filing 30

ORDER GRANTING AS UNOPPOSED PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting 25 Motion to Compel (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

8

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

BLANCA SANTOS,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.
LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 11-CV-02683 PSG
ORDER GRANTING AS
UNOPPOSED PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO COMPEL
(Re: Docket No. 25)

16
Plaintiff Blanca Santos (“Santos”) moves to compel Defendants LVNV Funding, LLC
17
(“LVNV”), The Brachfeld Law Group, PC (“BLG”) and Erica Brachfeld (“Brachfeld”)
18
(collectively “Defendants”) to supplement certain responses to her first and second set of
19
interrogatories. Santos also moves to compel Defendants to verify their responses. None of the
20
Defendants have opposed or otherwise responded to the motion. Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), the
21
motion is taken under submission and the hearing scheduled to be held on May 29, 2012 is vacated.
22
Having reviewed the papers and considered the arguments of counsel,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Santos’s motion to compel is GRANTED as unopposed.
24
On April 20, 2012, Santos filed the motion to compel. Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-3(a), an
25
opposition was due no later than May 4, 2012. To date, Defendants have not filed any opposition.
26
27
28
1
Case No.: C 11-2683 EJD (PSG)
ORDER

1

Santos moves to compel Defendants to provide further responses to interrogatory nos. 4 and

2

6 in her first set of interrogatories, Brachfeld and BLG to provide further responses to interrogatory

3

no. 19 in her second set of interrogatories, and Defendants to provide further responses to

4

interrogatory nos. 20 and 25 in her second set of interrogatories. Santos also moves to compel

5

Brachfeld to provide verifications for her responses to the first and second set of interrogatories

6

and for Defendants to provide verifications for their responses to her second set of interrogatories

7

and for further responses to her first set of interrogatories.

8

The court is persuaded that Santos’ requests for supplementation and verification are
justified, and by their silence Defendants appear to agree. No later than June 8, 2012, Defendants

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

9

shall supplement their responses to Santos’s first and second set of interrogatories and serve their

11

verifications.

12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14

Dated:

5/25/2012

_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: C 11-2683 EJD (PSG)
ORDER