Ung et al v. Facebook, Inc.
Filing
14
STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Regarding Continuance of CMC by Facebook, Inc.. (Brown, Matthew) (Filed on 8/16/2011)
1
5
COOLEY LLP
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127)
(rhodesmg@cooley.com)
MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972)
(brownmd@cooley.com)
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
(415) 693-2000
Facsimile:
(415) 693-2222
6
Attorneys for Defendant Facebook, Inc.
2
3
4
7
11
REESE RICHMAN LLP
MICHAEL R. REESE (206773)
(michael@reeserichman.com)
875 Avenue of the Americas, 18th Floor
New York, New York 10001
Telephone: (212) 643-0500
Facsimile: (212) 253-4272
12
MILBERG LLP
JEFF S. WESTERMAN (94559)
(jwesterman@milberg.com)
DAVID E. AZAR (218319)
(dazar@milberg.com)
One California Plaza
300 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 3900
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (213) 617-1200
Facsimile: (213) 617-1975
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
8
9
10
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN JOSE DIVISION
18
RYAN UNG, CHI CHENG and ALICE
ROSEN, on Behalf of Themselves and
All Others Similarly Situated,
19
Plaintiffs,
20
v.
17
21
22
FACEBOOK, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 11-CV-02829-JF-PSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF CMC
(CIV. L.R. 6-1(B))
Courtroom:
Judge:
Trial Date:
3
Jeremy Fogel
None Set
23
24
This Stipulation is entered into by and among plaintiffs Ryan Ung, Chi Cheng, and Alice
25
Rosen (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) (Plaintiffs and
26
Facebook collectively “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel.
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1.
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
CONTINUANCE OF CMC
CASE NO. 10-CV-02829-JF-PSG
1
2
WHEREAS, on July 20, 2011, Facebook filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Class
Action Complaint;
3
WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulated Order, Plaintiffs’ opposition to the Motion to
4
Dismiss is due on September 1, 2011, and Facebook’s reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss
5
is due on September 28, 2011;
6
7
WHEREAS, pursuant to the stipulated Order, the earliest date for hearing the Motion to
Dismiss would be October 12, 2011;
8
WHEREAS, based on communications with this Court’s staff, the Parties understand that
9
Judge Fogel, to whom this action is assigned, will be leaving the bench in October 2011 to
10
become Director of the Federal Judicial Center, at which time this case will be reassigned to a
11
new Judge;
12
13
14
15
WHEREAS, this Court instructed the Parties to submit their briefing on the Motion to
Dismiss and that a hearing date and time will be set once the case is reassigned to a new Judge;
WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference currently is scheduled for August 26, 2011,
at 10:30 a.m.;
16
WHEREAS, the Parties believe that it would be a more efficient use of the Court’s and the
17
Parties’ resources to hold the Case Management Conference once briefing on the Motion to
18
Dismiss has been completed and once the case has been reassigned to a new Judge;
19
20
21
22
23
WHEREAS, there have been no previous modifications to the Case Management
Conference date; and
WHEREAS, the agreed-upon continuance of the Case Management Conference date
would not affect any other aspect of the case schedule.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree, subject to approval by the
24
Court, as follows:
25
1.
26
The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for August 26, 2011, at
10:30 a.m., is vacated.
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
2.
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
CONTINUANCE OF CMC
CASE NO. 10-CV-02829-JF-PSG
1
2.
The Case Management Conference will be reset once the case is reassigned to a
2
new Judge, to be held on or after October 12, 2011 (the earliest date for hearing the Motion to
3
Dismiss pursuant to an earlier-entered stipulated Order).
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5
6
Dated: August 16, 2011
/s/ Matthew D. Brown
Matthew D. Brown
Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC.
7
8
9
Dated: August 16, 2011
10
REESE RICHMAN LLP
/s/ Michael R. Reese
Michael R. Reese
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
11
12
13
COOLEY LLP
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
DATED: August ____, 2011
___________________________________
HON. JEREMY FOGEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
3.
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
CONTINUANCE OF CMC
CASE NO. 10-CV-02829-JF-PSG
1
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
2
I, Matthew D. Brown, attest that concurrence in the filing of this STIPULATION AND
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF CMC has been obtained from each
4
of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
5
America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 16th day of August, 2011, at San
6
Francisco, California.
7
/s/ Matthew D. Brown
Matthew D. Brown
8
9
10
1231696 v1/SF
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
4.
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
CONTINUANCE OF CMC
CASE NO. 10-CV-02829-JF-PSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?