Boy Racer, Inc v. Does 2-71

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING 21 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Motions terminated: 9 MOTION to Quash MOTION or MOTION to Modify Subpoena re 8 Order on Ex Parte Application, 2 Complaint filed by Does 2-71, 10 MOTION to Quash MOTION to Modify subpoena re 8 Order on Ex Parte Application, 2 Complaint, filed by John Doe, 11 MOTION to Quash filed by John Doe., John Doe, John Doe and John Doe terminated., ***Deadlines terminated. 21 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by Boy Racer, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/28/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)

Download PDF
S 6 7 ER R NIA avila FO a rd J . D LI Attorney for Plaintiff dw J u d ge E A H 5 RT 4 D RDERE IS SO O FIED IT DI AS MO NO 3 UNIT ED 2 Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000) Steele Hansmeier PLLC. 38 Miller Avenue, #263 Mill Valley, CA 94941 415-325-5900 blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com RT U O 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 BOY RACER, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) DOES 2-72, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ____________________________________) No. C-11-02833 EJD NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO THREE ANONYMOUS DOE DEFENDANTS; [PROPOSED] ORDER NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO THREE ANONYMOUS DOE DEFENDANTS 19 20 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), 21 Plaintiff voluntary dismisses all claims brought in this action against the three (3) anonymous Doe 22 Defendants associated with the three motions pending in this case: Motion to Quash or Modify 23 Subpoena (ECF No. 9), Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena (ECF No. 10), and Motion to Quash 24 or Modify Subpoena (ECF No. 11). To preserve privacy for these individuals, Plaintiff does not 25 address these Doe Defendants by name, or by their Internet Protocol (“IP”) addresses, and merely 26 27 28 identifies them by the motions they filed in this case. This is sufficient to notify the Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”) who have been properly notified by each subscriber of their pending motions. 1 At this point, therefore, for further clarity, considering the proceeding voluntary dismissals of 2 the three Doe Defendants associated with the above motions, this action is now essentially Boy 3 4 5 6 Racer, Inc. v. Does 5-72. The Motions to Quash, and the Responses thereto, should therefore no longer be pending before the Court. The hearing on these Motions to Quash is scheduled for October 11, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5 of the San Jose Federal Courthouse in front of 7 Magistrate Judge Grewal. (See ECF No. 12). In light of the above, the Motions to Quash are moot, 8 and the hearings are no longer necessary. Plaintiff requests that this hearing be taken off of the 9 Court’s motion calendar. 10 11 In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the three (3) Doe Defendants being dismissed here have neither filed answers to Plaintiff’s Complaint, nor a motion for summary 12 13 judgment. Dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) is therefore appropriate. 14 Inclusive of this dismissal, Doe Defendants have hereby been dismissed from this action without 15 prejudice, and their Motions to Quash or Modify Subpoena (ECF Nos. 9, 10, 11) should hereby be 16 denied as moot as their associated IP addresses are no longer part of this suit. 17 // 18 19 20 21 // // // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 27 28 // // 2 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE No. C-11-02833 EJD 1 Plaintiff still maintains claims against the other anonymous Doe Defendants remaining in this 2 action, and reserves the right to name such individuals and/or serve them when, and if, Plaintiff is in 3 possession of their identifying information in the future of this ongoing case. 4 Respectfully Submitted, 5 6 STEELE HANSMEIER PLLC, 7 8 DATED: September 27, 2011 9 By: ____/s/ Brett L. Gibbs, Esq._______ 10 Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000) Steele Hansmeier PLLC. 38 Miller Avenue, #263 Mill Valley, CA 94941 blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com Attorney for Plaintiff 11 12 13 14 // 15 // 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 3 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE No. C-11-02833 EJD UNIT ED 2 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 1 D ORDERE IT IS SO DIFIED AS MO 4 5 6 7 R NIA Davila A H 3 ward J. LI RT Judge Ed ER FO NO [PROPOSED] ORDER N F D IS T IC T O R C In light of the above, Doe Defendants associated with Motions to Quash or Modify Subpoena (ECF Nos. 9,10, and 11) are hereby DISMISSED from this case without prejudice, and, therefore are no longer part of this suit. Additionally, Motions to Quash or Modify Subpoena (ECF Nos. 9, 10, and 11) are DENIED as the issues raised therein are now MOOT. Likewise the hearing on these 8 Motions to Quash, currently, scheduled for October 11, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5 of the 9 San Jose Federal Courthouse in front of Magistrate Judge Grewal, is hereby removed from the 10 11 12 Court’s calendar. The Motions to Quash are terminated from the docket. Further, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff serve copies of this Order onto the relevant ISPs. IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 16 September 28, 2011 Dated: _____________________ _______________________________ Edward J. Davila United States District Court Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE No. C-11-02833 EJD 1 2 3 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on September 27, 2011, all individuals of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document, and all attachments and related documents, using the Court’s ECF system, in compliance with Local Rule 5-6 and General Order 45. 5 6 /s/_Brett L. Gibbs______ Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE No. C-11-02833 EJD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?