Boy Racer, Inc v. Does 2-71
Filing
22
ORDER GRANTING 21 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Motions terminated: 9 MOTION to Quash MOTION or MOTION to Modify Subpoena re 8 Order on Ex Parte Application, 2 Complaint filed by Does 2-71, 10 MOTION to Quash MOTION to Modify subpoena re 8 Order on Ex Parte Application, 2 Complaint, filed by John Doe, 11 MOTION to Quash filed by John Doe., John Doe, John Doe and John Doe terminated., ***Deadlines terminated. 21 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by Boy Racer, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/28/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)
S
6
7
ER
R NIA
avila
FO
a rd J . D
LI
Attorney for Plaintiff
dw
J u d ge E
A
H
5
RT
4
D
RDERE
IS SO O FIED
IT
DI
AS MO
NO
3
UNIT
ED
2
Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000)
Steele Hansmeier PLLC.
38 Miller Avenue, #263
Mill Valley, CA 94941
415-325-5900
blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
BOY RACER, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
DOES 2-72,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
____________________________________)
No. C-11-02833 EJD
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
AS TO THREE ANONYMOUS DOE
DEFENDANTS; [PROPOSED] ORDER
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO
THREE ANONYMOUS DOE DEFENDANTS
19
20
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1),
21
Plaintiff voluntary dismisses all claims brought in this action against the three (3) anonymous Doe
22
Defendants associated with the three motions pending in this case: Motion to Quash or Modify
23
Subpoena (ECF No. 9), Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena (ECF No. 10), and Motion to Quash
24
or Modify Subpoena (ECF No. 11). To preserve privacy for these individuals, Plaintiff does not
25
address these Doe Defendants by name, or by their Internet Protocol (“IP”) addresses, and merely
26
27
28
identifies them by the motions they filed in this case. This is sufficient to notify the Internet Service
Providers (“ISPs”) who have been properly notified by each subscriber of their pending motions.
1
At this point, therefore, for further clarity, considering the proceeding voluntary dismissals of
2
the three Doe Defendants associated with the above motions, this action is now essentially Boy
3
4
5
6
Racer, Inc. v. Does 5-72. The Motions to Quash, and the Responses thereto, should therefore no
longer be pending before the Court. The hearing on these Motions to Quash is scheduled for
October 11, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5 of the San Jose Federal Courthouse in front of
7
Magistrate Judge Grewal. (See ECF No. 12). In light of the above, the Motions to Quash are moot,
8
and the hearings are no longer necessary. Plaintiff requests that this hearing be taken off of the
9
Court’s motion calendar.
10
11
In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the three (3) Doe Defendants
being dismissed here have neither filed answers to Plaintiff’s Complaint, nor a motion for summary
12
13
judgment.
Dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) is therefore appropriate.
14
Inclusive of this dismissal, Doe Defendants have hereby been dismissed from this action without
15
prejudice, and their Motions to Quash or Modify Subpoena (ECF Nos. 9, 10, 11) should hereby be
16
denied as moot as their associated IP addresses are no longer part of this suit.
17
//
18
19
20
21
//
//
//
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
27
28
//
//
2
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
No. C-11-02833 EJD
1
Plaintiff still maintains claims against the other anonymous Doe Defendants remaining in this
2
action, and reserves the right to name such individuals and/or serve them when, and if, Plaintiff is in
3
possession of their identifying information in the future of this ongoing case.
4
Respectfully Submitted,
5
6
STEELE HANSMEIER PLLC,
7
8
DATED: September 27, 2011
9
By:
____/s/ Brett L. Gibbs, Esq._______
10
Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000)
Steele Hansmeier PLLC.
38 Miller Avenue, #263
Mill Valley, CA 94941
blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
11
12
13
14
//
15
//
16
//
17
//
18
//
19
//
20
//
21
//
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
3
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
No. C-11-02833 EJD
UNIT
ED
2
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
1
D
ORDERE
IT IS SO DIFIED
AS MO
4
5
6
7
R NIA
Davila
A
H
3
ward J.
LI
RT
Judge Ed
ER
FO
NO
[PROPOSED] ORDER
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
In light of the above, Doe Defendants associated with Motions to Quash or Modify Subpoena
(ECF Nos. 9,10, and 11) are hereby DISMISSED from this case without prejudice, and, therefore are
no longer part of this suit. Additionally, Motions to Quash or Modify Subpoena (ECF Nos. 9, 10,
and 11) are DENIED as the issues raised therein are now MOOT. Likewise the hearing on these
8
Motions to Quash, currently, scheduled for October 11, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5 of the
9
San Jose Federal Courthouse in front of Magistrate Judge Grewal, is hereby removed from the
10
11
12
Court’s calendar. The Motions to Quash are terminated from the docket.
Further, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff serve copies of this Order onto the relevant ISPs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
15
16
September 28, 2011
Dated: _____________________
_______________________________
Edward J. Davila
United States District Court Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
No. C-11-02833 EJD
1
2
3
4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that on September 27, 2011, all individuals of record who are
deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served a true and correct copy of the
foregoing document, and all attachments and related documents, using the Court’s ECF system, in
compliance with Local Rule 5-6 and General Order 45.
5
6
/s/_Brett L. Gibbs______
Brett L. Gibbs, Esq.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
No. C-11-02833 EJD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?