Microsoft Corporation v. TIVO Inc

Filing 45

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 44 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2012)

Case5:11-cv-02896-LHK Document44 Filed03/22/12 Page1 of 2

1 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
Jared Bobrow (SBN 133712)
2 [e-mail]
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
3 Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 Mark G. Davis (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
6
1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
7 Washington D.C. 20005-3314
Telephone: [phone]
8 Facsimile: [phone]
9 Attorneys for Plaintiff
Microsoft Corporation
10
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
11 Andrei Iancu (SBN 184973)
[e-mail]
12 Samuel Lu (SBN 171969)
[e-mail]
13 Joseph Lipner (SBN 155735)
[e-mail]
14 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
15 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
16
Attorneys for Defendant TiVo Inc.
17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
SAN JOSE DIVISION
21
22 MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
23
24

Plaintiff,
vs.

25 TIVO INC.,
26

Defendant.

27

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 5:11-CV-02896-LHK
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF
ALL CLAIMS

28
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
A Registered Limited Liability
Law Partnership Including
Professional Corporations

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL CLAIMS

CASE NO. 5:11-CV-02896 LHK

Case5:11-cv-02896-LHK Document44 Filed03/22/12 Page2 of 2

Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) and TiVo Inc. (“TiVo”) (collectively, the

1

2 “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as
3 follows:
4

This Stipulation of Dismissal is made pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of

5 Civil Procedure and agreements between the Parties.
6

WHEREAS, Microsoft filed the above-captioned action (the “Action”) asserting

7 claims against TiVo for alleged infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,731,844, 6,028,604, 5,585,838,
8 and 5,758,258 (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”);
9

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that Microsoft will dismiss with prejudice its

10 claims for infringement by TiVo of all of the Asserted Patents.
11

In light of the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:

12

1.

Microsoft's claims against TiVo for infringement of the Asserted Patents are

13 dismissed with prejudice.
14

2.

The Parties shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees in the Action.

15

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

16 Dated: March __, 2012

IRELL & MANELLA LLP

17
By:

18
19
20 Dated: March __, 2012

/s/ Joseph Lipner
Joseph Lipner
Attorneys for Defendant TiVo Inc.

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

21
By:

22
23

/s/ Jared Bobrow
Jared Bobrow
Attorneys for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation

The Clerk shall close the file.

24
25

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

26
27

March 23
Dated: ___________, 2012

By:
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

28
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
A Registered Limited Liability
Law Partnership Including
Professional Corporations

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL CLAIMS

1

CASE NO. 5:11-CV-02896 LHK