Adiscov, L.L.C. v. Autonomy Corp., PLC et al
Filing
107
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS BETWEEN ADISCOV, LLC AND AUTONOMY CORP, PLC WITH PREJUDICE, re 106 Stipulation filed by Autonomy Corp., PLC, Adiscov, L.L.C. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 11/10/2011. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Benedict O’Mahoney (SBN 152447)
Terra Law LLP
177 Park Ave., Third Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: (408) 299-1200
Facsimile: (408) 998-4895
Email: bomahoney@terra-law.com
Edward W. Goldstein, Esq.
Texas Bar No. 08099500
Califf T. Cooper, Esq.
Texas Bar No. 24055345
GOLDSTEIN & LIPSKI, PLLC
1177 West Loop South, Suite 400
Houston, Texas 77027
Telephone: (713) 877-1515
Facsimile: (713) 877-1515
Email: egoldstein@gliplaw.com
Email: ccooper@gliplaw.com
NOAH A. BRUMFIELD (S.B. # 203653)
nbrumfield@whitecase.com
SHAMITA D. ETIENNE-CUMMINGS
(S.B. # 202090)
setienne@whitecase.com
BIJAL V. VAKIL (S.B. # 192878)
bvakil@whitecase.com
WHITE & CASE LLP
5 Palo Alto Square, 9th Floor
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone: (650) 213-0300
Facsimile: (650) 213-8158
Attorneys for Defendant
AUTONOMY, CORP., PLC
Attorneys for Plaintiff Adiscov, LLC
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
18
CASE NO. CV11-02897 PSG
ADISCOV, L.L.C.,
19
20
Plaintiff,
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS
BETWEEN ADISCOV, LLC AND
AUTONOMY CORP, PLC WITH
PREJUDICE
21 AUTONOMY CORP. PLC, et al.,
22
Defendants.
Honorable Paul S. Grewal
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-CV-02897 (PSG)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS
BETWEEN ADISCOV LLC AND AUTONOMY CORP. PLC
1
Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the terms of a separate
2 agreement, the Plaintiff, Adiscov, LLC (“Adiscov”) and Defendant, Autonomy Corp PLC
3 (“Autonomy”) have agreed to settle, adjust and compromise all claims in the above-captioned
4 action. The parties, therefore, move this Court to dismiss the above-entitled cause and all claims
5 by Adiscov against Autonomy and all claims by Autonomy against Adiscov made therein with
6 prejudice to the re-filing of same.
7
The parties further move the Court to order that all costs and expenses relating to this
8 litigation (including attorney and expert fees and expenses) shall be borne solely by the party
9 incurring same.
10
So Stipulated.
11
12
13
14
15
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18 DATED: November
, 2011
_______________________________
Honorable Paul S. Grewal
United States District Judge
19
20
21
GOLDSTEIN & LIPSKI, P.L.L.C.
WHITE & CASE LLP
By: _/s/ Edward W. Goldstein_____________
Edward W. Goldstein (Pro Hac Vice)
By: _/s/ Bijal V. Vakil
Bijal V. Vakil
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ADISCOV, LLC
Attorneys for Defendant
AUTONOMY CORP., PLC
22
23
24
25
____________
26
27
28
Case No. 11-CV-02897 (PSG)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS
BETWEEN ADISCOV LLC AND AUTONOMY CORP. PLC
-1-
1
2
ATTESTATION
I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B that concurrence in the electronic filing of
3 this document has been obtained from the signatories.
4 Dated: November 10, 2011
5
/s/ Edward W. Goldstein________
Edward W. Goldstein
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-CV-02897 (PSG)
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS
BETWEEN ADISCOV LLC AND AUTONOMY CORP. PLC
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have
3 consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s ECF
4 System.
5 Dated: November 10, 2011
6
/s/ Edward W. Goldstein________
Edward W. Goldstein
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-CV-02897 (PSG)
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS
BETWEEN ADISCOV LLC AND AUTONOMY CORP. PLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?