Adiscov, L.L.C. v. Autonomy Corp., PLC et al

Filing 109

ORDER re 108 Stipulation filed by Recommind, Inc., Adiscov, L.L.C. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 11/22/2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Benedict O’Mahoney (SBN 152447)
Terra Law LLP
177 Park Ave., Third Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Edward W. Goldstein, Esq.
Texas Bar No. 08099500
Califf T. Cooper, Esq.
Texas Bar No. 24055345
GOLDSTEIN & LIPSKI, PLLC
1177 West Loop South, Suite 400
Houston, Texas 77027
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN JOSE DIVISION

17

CASE NO. CV11-02897 PSG
ADISCOV, L.L.C.,

19
20

Plaintiff,
v.

21 AUTONOMY CORP. PLC, et al.,
22

Attorneys for Defendant
RECOMMIND, INC.

Attorneys for Plaintiff Adiscov, LLC

14

18

DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136006)
[e-mail]
ALEXANDER B. PARKER (S.B. #264705)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

Defendants.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS
BETWEEN ADISCOV, LLC AND
RECOMMIND, INC.
Honorable Paul S. Grewal
United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 11-CV-02897 (PSG)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS
BETWEEN ADISCOV LLC AND RECOMMIND, INC.

1

Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Plaintiff, Adiscov, LLC

2 (“Adiscov”) and Defendant, Recommind, Inc. (“Recommind”) have agreed to resolve all claims in
3 the above-captioned action. The parties, therefore, move this Court to dismiss the above-entitled
4 cause and all claims by Adiscov against Recommind with prejudice and all claims by Recommind
5 against Adiscov without prejudice to the re-filing of same.
6

The parties further move the Court to order that all costs and expenses relating to this

7 litigation (including attorney and expert fees and expenses) shall be borne solely by the party
8 incurring same.
9

So Stipulated.

10
11
12 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14 DATED: November _22, 2011
15

_______________________________
Honorable Paul S. Grewal
United States District Judge

16
17
18

GOLDSTEIN & LIPSKI, P.L.L.C.

19

By: _/s/ Edward W. Goldstein_____________
Edward W. Goldstein (Pro Hac Vice)

20
21
22
23

Attorneys for Plaintiff
ADISCOV, LLC

DARIN W. SNYDER
ALEXANDER B. PARKER
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
By: /s/ Darin W. Synder
Darin W. Snyder
Attorneys for Defendant
RECOMMIND, INC.

24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 11-CV-02897 (PSG)
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS
BETWEEN ADISCOV LLC AND RECOMMIND, INC.

1
2

ATTESTATION
I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B that concurrence in the electronic filing of

3 this document has been obtained from the signatories.
4 Dated: November 22, 2011
5

/s/ Edward W. Goldstein________
Edward W. Goldstein

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-CV-02897 (PSG)
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS
BETWEEN ADISCOV LLC AND RECOMMIND, INC.

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2

The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have

3 consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s ECF
4 System.
5 Dated: November 22, 2011
6

/s/ Edward W. Goldstein________
Edward W. Goldstein

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-CV-02897 (PSG)
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS
BETWEEN ADISCOV LLC AND RECOMMIND, INC.