Cellectricon AB v. Fluxion Biosciences, Inc.

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER 21 Continuing Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines: Case Management Conference set for 12/9/2011 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 10/20/11. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Eric L. Wesenberg (SBN 139696) ewesenberg@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE, LLP 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: 650-838-4300 Facsimile: 650-838-4350 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Jeffrey S. Love (SBN 195068) jeffrey.love@klarquist.com Deakin T. Lauer (Pro Hac Vice) deakin.lauer@klarquist.com Salumeh R. Loesch (Pro Hac Vice) salumeh.loesch@klarquist.com KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, OR 97204-2988 Telephone: 503-595-5300 Facsimile: 503-595-5301 David G. Conlin (Pro Hac Vice) dconlin@edwardswildman.com George W. Neuner (Pro Hac Vice) gneuner@edwardswildman.com Brian M. Gaff (SBN 202896) bgaff@edwardswildman.com EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP 111 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02199-7613 Telephone No.: 617-239-0100 Facsimile: 617-227-4420 Neil A. Smith (SBN 63777) nsmith@rmkb.com ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN, & BENTLEY P.C. 50 W. San Fernando Street, Suite 1400 San Jose, CA 95113-2431 Telephone No.: 408-287-6262 Facsimile: 408-918-4501 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant FLUXION BIOSCIENCES, INC. Attorneys for Plaintiff CELLECTRICON AB 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN JOSE DIVISION 18 CELLECTRICON AB, Plaintiff, 19 20 21 22 Case No.: 3:11-cv-03009-RMW STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES v. FLUXION BIOSCIENCES, INC., [Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12] Defendant. Current CMC Date: October 28, 2011 Proposed New CMC Date: December 9, 2011 23 24 Courtroom 6, 4th Floor Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No.: 3:11-cv-03009-RMW 1 Defendant Fluxion Biosciences, Inc. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Cellectricon AB 2 (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, respectfully submit this Joint 3 Stipulation and Proposed Order seeking a six week continuance of the Case Management 4 Conference from October 28, 2011 to December 9, 2011, or to such later date as is convenient for 5 the Court. 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, on July 29, 2011, the Court ordered a further Case Management Conference for October 28, 2011. WHEREAS, Defendant hopes to settle this case soon. The parties jointly request a postponement to avoid unnecessary expense in the meantime. 10 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT: 11 The Case Management Conference, presently scheduled for October 28, 2011, may be 12 13 continued to December 9, 2011, or as soon thereafter as the Court’s schedule will allow. IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 14 15 Dated: October 14, 2011 16 Jeffrey S. Love (SBN 195068) Deakin T. Lauer (Pro Hac Vice) Salumeh R. Loesch (Pro Hac Vice) KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 17 18 19 Attorneys for Defendant FLUXION BIOSCIENCES, INC. 20 21 22 23 24 25 /s/Jeffrey S. Love Eric L. Wesenberg (SBN 139696) PERKINS COIE, LLP Dated: October 14, 2011 /s/George W. Neuner David G. Conlin (Pro Hac Vice) George W. Neuner (Pro Hac Vice) Brian M. Gaff (SBN 202896) EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP Neil A. Smith (SBN 63777) ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN, & BENTLEY P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff CELLECTRICON AB 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No.: 3:11-cv-03009-RMW 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 2 Dated: _________________, 2011 3 4 _________________________________________ HON. RONALD M. WHYTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No.: 3:11-cv-03009-RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?