Perez v. 24 Hour Fitness

Filing 7

ORDER re 6 Stipulation filed by 24 Hour Fitness, ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on September 16, 2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2011)

Download PDF
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Kathleen Maylin (SBN 155371) Mia N. Tucker (SBN 268389) JACKSON LEWIS LLP 199 Fremont Street 10111 Floor San Francisco, Calitomia 94105 Telephone: (415) 394-9400 Facsimile: (415) 394-9401 Email: MaylinKfal,jacksonlewis.cQm Mia.TuckerrO:{jacksonlewis.com Attorneys for Dctcndant 24 HOUR FITNESS USA. INC. (erroneously sued as '"24 HR Fitness") Carl Alfred Lindstrom Jr LINDSTROM LAW OFFICF.::S 1975 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 27 San Jose, California 95125 Telephone: (408) 540-7164 Facsimile: (408) 351-0510 Email: lindyjr@lindstromlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff SUSAN PEREZ 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 No. C 11-03078 PSG SUSAN PEREZ. Plaintiff: 20 Complaint filed: v. 21 STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION AND REFERRAL TO BINDING ARBITRATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendant. 19 24 HR FITNESS. 22 June 22. 2011 23 24 25 TO THE HONORABLE COURT: WHEREAS on October 23. 2000 and January 25. 2005. Plaintiff SUSAN PEREZ 26 ("Plaintiff') signed acknowledgements agreeing to arbitrate any dispute. claim or controversy 27 arising out of her employment (OJ' termination of employment) with her former employer, 24 28 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. ("24 Hour Fitness") (erroneously sued herein as "'24 HR Fitness") STIPULATION RE DISMISSAl. OF ACTION AND RP.FERRAL TO BINDING ARBITRATION: [PROPOSED] OIWER (No. C 11·03078 PSG) 1 (collectively ••the Parties")~ and to submit the dispute to a neutral arbitrator for resolution via 2 binding arbitration. 3 WHEREAS on June 22, 2011. Plaintiff Susan Perez filed a Complaint ("Complaint") in 4 the United States District Court, Northern District of California, alleging age discrimination S against 24 Hour Fitness. 6 WHEREAS on September 12.2011. Plaintiff agreed to dismiss this civil action and 7 submit her claim to final and binding atbitration pursuant to the terms of the Parties' employment 8 agreement. 9 10 11 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties through their respective counsel of record: 1. 12 13 14 15 This action be dismissed to allow the parties to submit to binding arbitration pursuant to contractual agreement 2. The parties will refer this matter for binding arbitration before a mutually agreed upon arbitratot at JAMS San Francisco. IT IS SO STIPULATED: 16 17 JACKSON LEWIS LLP Date: September_, 2011 //_~ By: -----_;;:::...-""'----~ Kathleen Maylin 18 19 20 Mia N. Tucker 21 Attorneys for Defendant 24 HOUR FITNESS USA. INC. (erroneously sued as ·•24 f-IR Fitness") 22 23 Date: September d.~ 2011 OFFICES 24 25 By:_-=-~':-L-:---~----­ Carl indstrom Attor.1eys for Plaintiff SUSAN PEREZ 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL Or ACTION AND ReFERRAL TO BINDING ARI31'i'RATION; [PROI)OSED) ORDER 2 (No. C 11-03078 PSG) [PROPOSE.DIOR.DER 2 Based on this Stipulation of the Parties and for good cause shown. it is h~reby ordered that 3 the terms of this Stipulation are approved and adopted. and this action shall be dismissed and the 4 Parties may submit the claims to binding arbitration. 5 THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED AN.D IS SO OR.DERE.D. 6 7 8 Dated: 9/16/2011 United States District Court Judge Magistrate 9 10 II 12 4823·9264·9226, v. I 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATIOtoi Rr; DISMISSAL OF ACTION t\NI) REFERRAL TO BINDING ARBITRATION~ (PROP0$1:1)] ORDER 3 (No. C 11·03078 PSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?