Perez v. 24 Hour Fitness
Filing
7
ORDER re 6 Stipulation filed by 24 Hour Fitness, ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on September 16, 2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2011)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Kathleen Maylin (SBN 155371)
Mia N. Tucker (SBN 268389)
JACKSON LEWIS LLP
199 Fremont Street 10111 Floor
San Francisco, Calitomia 94105
Telephone: (415) 394-9400
Facsimile: (415) 394-9401
Email: MaylinKfal,jacksonlewis.cQm
Mia.TuckerrO:{jacksonlewis.com
Attorneys for Dctcndant
24 HOUR FITNESS USA. INC. (erroneously sued
as '"24 HR Fitness")
Carl Alfred Lindstrom Jr
LINDSTROM LAW OFFICF.::S
1975 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 27
San Jose, California 95125
Telephone: (408) 540-7164
Facsimile: (408) 351-0510
Email: lindyjr@lindstromlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SUSAN PEREZ
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
No. C 11-03078 PSG
SUSAN PEREZ.
Plaintiff:
20
Complaint filed:
v.
21
STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL OF
ACTION AND REFERRAL TO
BINDING ARBITRATION;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Defendant.
19
24 HR FITNESS.
22
June 22. 2011
23
24
25
TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
WHEREAS on October 23. 2000 and January 25. 2005. Plaintiff SUSAN PEREZ
26
("Plaintiff') signed acknowledgements agreeing to arbitrate any dispute. claim or controversy
27
arising out of her employment (OJ' termination of employment) with her former employer, 24
28
Hour Fitness USA, Inc. ("24 Hour Fitness") (erroneously sued herein as "'24 HR Fitness")
STIPULATION
RE DISMISSAl. OF
ACTION AND
RP.FERRAL TO BINDING ARBITRATION:
[PROPOSED] OIWER
(No. C 11·03078 PSG)
1
(collectively ••the Parties")~ and to submit the dispute to a neutral arbitrator for resolution via
2
binding arbitration.
3
WHEREAS on June 22, 2011. Plaintiff Susan Perez filed a Complaint ("Complaint") in
4
the United States District Court, Northern District of California, alleging age discrimination
S
against 24 Hour Fitness.
6
WHEREAS on September 12.2011. Plaintiff agreed to dismiss this civil action and
7
submit her claim to final and binding atbitration pursuant to the terms of the Parties' employment
8
agreement.
9
10
11
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties through their
respective counsel of record:
1.
12
13
14
15
This action be dismissed to allow the parties to submit to binding arbitration
pursuant to contractual agreement
2.
The parties will refer this matter for binding arbitration before a mutually agreed
upon arbitratot at JAMS San Francisco.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
16
17
JACKSON LEWIS LLP
Date: September_, 2011
//_~
By: -----_;;:::...-""'----~
Kathleen Maylin
18
19
20
Mia N. Tucker
21
Attorneys for Defendant
24 HOUR FITNESS USA. INC.
(erroneously sued as ·•24 f-IR Fitness")
22
23
Date: September d.~ 2011
OFFICES
24
25
By:_-=-~':-L-:---~----
Carl indstrom
Attor.1eys for Plaintiff
SUSAN PEREZ
26
27
28
STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL Or ACTION AND
ReFERRAL TO BINDING ARI31'i'RATION;
[PROI)OSED) ORDER
2
(No. C 11-03078 PSG)
[PROPOSE.DIOR.DER
2
Based on this Stipulation of the Parties and for good cause shown. it is h~reby ordered that
3
the terms of this Stipulation are approved and adopted. and this action shall be dismissed and the
4
Parties may submit the claims to binding arbitration.
5
THE FOREGOING STIPULATION
IS APPROVED AN.D IS SO OR.DERE.D.
6
7
8
Dated: 9/16/2011
United States District Court Judge
Magistrate
9
10
II
12
4823·9264·9226, v. I
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATIOtoi Rr; DISMISSAL OF ACTION t\NI)
REFERRAL TO BINDING ARBITRATION~
(PROP0$1:1)] ORDER
3
(No. C 11·03078 PSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?