Costanza et al v. Google, Inc.

Filing 19

Case transferred in from District of Texas Eastern; Case Number 6:10-cv-00626. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.

Download PDF
CLOSED, MDL U.S. District Court [LIVE] Eastern District of TEXAS (Tyler) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 6:10−cv−00626−LED Costanza et al v. Google, Inc. Assigned to: Judge Leonard Davis Cause: 18:2511 Wiretapping Date Filed: 11/24/2010 Date Terminated: 06/23/2011 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions Jurisdiction: Federal Question Plaintiff Kimberly Costanza represented by Eric Hugh Findlay Findlay Craft 6760 Old Jacksonville Hwy Suite 101 Tyler, TX 75703 903/534−1100 Fax: 903/534−1137 Email: efindlay@findlaycraft.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Plaintiff Cindy Brady represented by Eric Hugh Findlay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Plaintiff Michael Hill represented by Eric Hugh Findlay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED V. Defendant Google, Inc. represented by Jose Carlos Villarreal Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &Rosati 8911 Capital of Texas Highway Westech 360, Ste 3350 Austin, TX 78759−7247 512/338−5400 Fax: 15123385499 Email: jvillarreal@wsgr.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jennifer Parker Ainsworth Wilson Robertson &Cornelius PC 909 ESE Loop 323 Suite 400 P.O. Box 7339 Tyler, TX 75711−7339 903−509−5000 Fax: 903−509−5092 Email: jainsworth@wilsonlawfirm.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Date Filed # Docket Text 11/24/2010 Ï1 COMPLAINT against Google, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0540−2776142.), filed by Kimberly Costanza, Michael Hill, Cindy Brady. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 11/24/2010) 11/24/2010 Ï 11/29/2010 Ï2 E−GOV SEALED SUMMONS Issued as to Google, Inc. (kls, ) (Entered: 11/29/2010) 12/09/2010 Ï3 Return of Service Executed as to Google, Inc. on 11/30/2010, by personal service; answer due: 12/21/2010. (mll, ) (Entered: 12/09/2010) 12/28/2010 Ï4 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Google, Inc..( Villarreal, Jose) (Entered: 12/28/2010) 12/29/2010 Ï 01/19/2011 Ï5 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Google, Inc..( Villarreal, Jose) (Entered: 01/19/2011) 01/20/2011 Ï6 MOTION to Stay by Google, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3 (part 1), # 4 Exhibit 3 (part 2), # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Text of Proposed Order)(Ainsworth, Jennifer) (Entered: 01/20/2011) 01/20/2011 Ï7 Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint by Google, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Text of Proposed Order, # 5 Text of Proposed Order Order Setting Schedule)(Ainsworth, Jennifer) (Entered: 01/20/2011) 01/24/2011 Ï Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint 5 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV−12 for Google, Inc. to 1/28/2011. 8 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, ) (Entered: 01/24/2011) 01/24/2011 Ï8 ORDER granting 7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Deft Google's deadline to respond to the Complaint is tolled while the Court considers Google's pending Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 01/24/11. cc:attys 1−25−11(mll, ) (Entered: 01/25/2011) 01/27/2011 Ï9 Joint MOTION for Briefing Schedule re 6 MOTION to Stay by Cindy Brady, Kimberly Costanza, Google, Inc., Michael Hill. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ainsworth, Jennifer) (Entered: 01/27/2011) 01/31/2011 Ï 10 Judge Leonard Davis added. (mll, ) (Entered: 11/24/2010) Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint 4 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV−12 for Google, Inc. to 1/20/2011. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, ) (Entered: 12/29/2010) RESPONSE to Motion re 6 MOTION to Stay filed by Cindy Brady, Kimberly Costanza, Michael Hill. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Text of Proposed Order)(Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 01/31/2011) 02/01/2011 Ï 11 ORDER granting 9 Motion for Briefing Schedule on Google Inc's Motion to Stay. Pltf's Response is due 1−31−11; Deft's Reply is due 2−04−11; Pltf's Surreply is due 2−07−11. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 02/01/11. cc:attys 2−01−11 (mll, ) (Entered: 02/01/2011) 02/04/2011 Ï 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re 6 MOTION to Stay filed by Google, Inc.. (Ainsworth, Jennifer) (Entered: 02/04/2011) 02/07/2011 Ï 13 SUR−REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 6 MOTION to Stay filed by Cindy Brady, Kimberly Costanza, Michael Hill. (Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 02/07/2011) 02/08/2011 Ï 14 Additional Attachments to Main Document: 13 Sur−Reply to Reply to Response to Motion.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 02/08/2011) 02/17/2011 Ï 15 NOTICE by Cindy Brady, Kimberly Costanza, Michael Hill re 6 MOTION to Stay Supplemental Notice Regarding Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 02/17/2011) 04/01/2011 Ï 16 ORDER that plaintiff file a notice that the case is ready for scheduling conference when all of the defendants have either answered or filed a motion to transfer or dismiss. The notice shall be filed within five days of the last remaining defendant's answer or motion. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 04/01/11. cc:attys 4−04−11(mll, ) (Entered: 04/04/2011) 04/11/2011 Ï 17 NOTICE by Cindy Brady, Kimberly Costanza, Michael Hill NOTICE OF ENTRY OF TRANSFER ORDER (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit MDL 2184 Transfer Order)(Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 04/11/2011) 06/23/2011 Ï 18 MDL ORDER transferring this civil action to the Nothern District of California to be included with MDL 2184, In Re: Google Inc Street View Electronic Communications Litigation. (mll, ) (Entered: 06/23/2011) 06/23/2011 Ï Interdistrict transfer to the Northern District of California, to be included with MDL 2184. (mll, ) (Entered: 06/23/2011)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?