Costanza et al v. Google, Inc.
Filing
19
Case transferred in from District of Texas Eastern; Case Number 6:10-cv-00626. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
CLOSED, MDL
U.S. District Court [LIVE]
Eastern District of TEXAS (Tyler)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 6:10−cv−00626−LED
Costanza et al v. Google, Inc.
Assigned to: Judge Leonard Davis
Cause: 18:2511 Wiretapping
Date Filed: 11/24/2010
Date Terminated: 06/23/2011
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Plaintiff
Kimberly Costanza
represented by Eric Hugh Findlay
Findlay Craft
6760 Old Jacksonville Hwy
Suite 101
Tyler, TX 75703
903/534−1100
Fax: 903/534−1137
Email: efindlay@findlaycraft.com
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Plaintiff
Cindy Brady
represented by Eric Hugh Findlay
(See above for address)
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Plaintiff
Michael Hill
represented by Eric Hugh Findlay
(See above for address)
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Defendant
Google, Inc.
represented by Jose Carlos Villarreal
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &Rosati
8911 Capital of Texas Highway
Westech 360, Ste 3350
Austin, TX 78759−7247
512/338−5400
Fax: 15123385499
Email: jvillarreal@wsgr.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Jennifer Parker Ainsworth
Wilson Robertson &Cornelius PC
909 ESE Loop 323
Suite 400
P.O. Box 7339
Tyler, TX 75711−7339
903−509−5000
Fax: 903−509−5092
Email: jainsworth@wilsonlawfirm.com
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Date Filed
#
Docket Text
11/24/2010
Ï1
COMPLAINT against Google, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number
0540−2776142.), filed by Kimberly Costanza, Michael Hill, Cindy Brady.
(Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 11/24/2010)
11/24/2010
Ï
11/29/2010
Ï2
E−GOV SEALED SUMMONS Issued as to Google, Inc. (kls, ) (Entered:
11/29/2010)
12/09/2010
Ï3
Return of Service Executed as to Google, Inc. on 11/30/2010, by personal service;
answer due: 12/21/2010. (mll, ) (Entered: 12/09/2010)
12/28/2010
Ï4
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer
Complaint re Google, Inc..( Villarreal, Jose) (Entered: 12/28/2010)
12/29/2010
Ï
01/19/2011
Ï5
Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer
Complaint re Google, Inc..( Villarreal, Jose) (Entered: 01/19/2011)
01/20/2011
Ï6
MOTION to Stay by Google, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3
Exhibit 3 (part 1), # 4 Exhibit 3 (part 2), # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit
6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, #
13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Text of Proposed Order)(Ainsworth, Jennifer) (Entered:
01/20/2011)
01/20/2011
Ï7
Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint by
Google, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Text of
Proposed Order, # 5 Text of Proposed Order Order Setting Schedule)(Ainsworth,
Jennifer) (Entered: 01/20/2011)
01/24/2011
Ï
Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer
Complaint 5 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV−12 for Google, Inc. to
1/28/2011. 8 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, ) (Entered: 01/24/2011)
01/24/2011
Ï8
ORDER granting 7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Deft Google's
deadline to respond to the Complaint is tolled while the Court considers Google's
pending Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 01/24/11. cc:attys
1−25−11(mll, ) (Entered: 01/25/2011)
01/27/2011
Ï9
Joint MOTION for Briefing Schedule re 6 MOTION to Stay by Cindy Brady,
Kimberly Costanza, Google, Inc., Michael Hill. (Attachments: # 1 Text of
Proposed Order)(Ainsworth, Jennifer) (Entered: 01/27/2011)
01/31/2011
Ï 10
Judge Leonard Davis added. (mll, ) (Entered: 11/24/2010)
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer
Complaint 4 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV−12 for Google, Inc. to
1/20/2011. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, ) (Entered: 12/29/2010)
RESPONSE to Motion re 6 MOTION to Stay filed by Cindy Brady, Kimberly
Costanza, Michael Hill. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3,
# 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Text of Proposed Order)(Findlay, Eric) (Entered:
01/31/2011)
02/01/2011
Ï 11
ORDER granting 9 Motion for Briefing Schedule on Google Inc's Motion to Stay.
Pltf's Response is due 1−31−11; Deft's Reply is due 2−04−11; Pltf's Surreply is
due 2−07−11. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 02/01/11. cc:attys 2−01−11
(mll, ) (Entered: 02/01/2011)
02/04/2011
Ï 12
REPLY to Response to Motion re 6 MOTION to Stay filed by Google, Inc..
(Ainsworth, Jennifer) (Entered: 02/04/2011)
02/07/2011
Ï 13
SUR−REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 6 MOTION to Stay filed by
Cindy Brady, Kimberly Costanza, Michael Hill. (Findlay, Eric) (Entered:
02/07/2011)
02/08/2011
Ï 14
Additional Attachments to Main Document: 13 Sur−Reply to Reply to Response
to Motion.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Findlay, Eric) (Entered:
02/08/2011)
02/17/2011
Ï 15
NOTICE by Cindy Brady, Kimberly Costanza, Michael Hill re 6 MOTION to
Stay Supplemental Notice Regarding Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion
to Stay (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 02/17/2011)
04/01/2011
Ï 16
ORDER that plaintiff file a notice that the case is ready for scheduling conference
when all of the defendants have either answered or filed a motion to transfer or
dismiss. The notice shall be filed within five days of the last remaining
defendant's answer or motion. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 04/01/11.
cc:attys 4−04−11(mll, ) (Entered: 04/04/2011)
04/11/2011
Ï 17
NOTICE by Cindy Brady, Kimberly Costanza, Michael Hill NOTICE OF ENTRY
OF TRANSFER ORDER (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit MDL 2184 Transfer
Order)(Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 04/11/2011)
06/23/2011
Ï 18
MDL ORDER transferring this civil action to the Nothern District of California to
be included with MDL 2184, In Re: Google Inc Street View Electronic
Communications Litigation. (mll, ) (Entered: 06/23/2011)
06/23/2011
Ï
Interdistrict transfer to the Northern District of California, to be included with
MDL 2184. (mll, ) (Entered: 06/23/2011)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?