Scott v. Lewis
Filing
14
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; RE-OPENING CASE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/11/12. (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
ERIC D. SCOTT,
13
14
15
Petitioner,
v.
WARDEN G.D. LEWIS,
16
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 11-3128 LHK (PR)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION; REOPENING CASE
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus
18
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 21, 2011, the Court issued an order to show cause,
19
and ordered Petitioner to pay the filing fee within thirty days. On December 6, 2011, having
20
received no indication of payment from Petitioner, the Court dismissed the action and entered
21
judgment.
22
On December 30, 2011, the Clerk entered into the docket a letter filed by Petitioner on
23
December 23, 2011. In that letter, Petitioner disputes the dismissal, arguing that he paid the
24
filing fee within the Court-ordered deadline. Petitioner included a copy of the receipt he
25
received confirming that he paid the required filing fee on November 18, 2011. The Court
26
construes Petitioner’s letter as a motion for reconsideration. So construed, the motion is
27
GRANTED. The Clerk shall RE-OPEN this case.
28
Order Granting Motion for Reconsideration; Re-Opening Case
P:\pro-se\sj.lhk\hc.11\Scott525recon
1
Petitioner’s traverse to Respondent’s answer shall be filed no later than thirty days from
2
the filing date of this order.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1/11/12
DATED:
4
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Granting Motion for Reconsideration; Re-Opening Case
2
P:\pro-se\sj.lhk\hc.11\Scott525recon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?