Guillem v. Life Insurance Company of America et al
Filing
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER Plaintiff Counsel's Telephonic Appearance for 9/16/2011 CMC re 13 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/26/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2011)
4
Ray Bourhis, Esq. SBN 53196
Lawrence Mann, Esq. SBN 83698
BOURHIS & MANN
1050 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: (415) 392-4660; Fax: (415) 421-0259
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff CECILE GUILLEM
1
2
3
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
LIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY )
OF AMERICA, TRANSAMERICA LIFE
)
INSURANCE COMPANY, ALAN
)
KAISLER-MEZA, M.D., and DOES 1 – 50,
)
inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
CECILE GUILLEM,
Case No.: 5:11-cv-03217 (EJD)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF’S
COUNSEL’S TELEPHONIC
APPEARANCE AT THE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
DATE: September 16, 2011
TIME: 10:00 a.m.
PLACE: Ctrm. 1, 5th Floor
280 South 1st Street
San Jose, CA 95113
JUDGE: The Hon. Edward J. Davila
20
21
Lawrence Mann, partner at Bourhis & Mann and attorney for Plaintiff, is scheduled to
22
appear at a settlement conference (tentative) in the morning and two case management conferences
23
with Judge Chernus in the afternoon at the Marin County Superior Court on September 16, 2011,
24
the same date set for the Case Management Conference in the above-captioned matter. Therefore,
25
counsel respectfully requests the Court’s permission to participate telephonically in the Sept. 16th
26
Case Management Conference. Counsel for all parties have consented to this request.
27
28
1
Case No. 5:11-cv-03217 (EJD)
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Permitting Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Telephonic Appearance at the Case Management Conference
1
STIPULATION
2
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel
3
of record, that if the Court permits, Lawrence Mann shall be permitted to participate in the
4
September 16, 2011 (10:00 a.m.) Case Management Conference via telephone.
5
Dated:
August 23, 2011
BOURHIS & MANN
By:___/s/ Lawrence Mann
____
Ray Bourhis, Esq.
Lawrence Mann, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff CECILE GUILLEM
6
7
8
9
10
Dated:
August 23, 2011
11
WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ
EDELMAN & DICKER, LLP
By:___/s/ Donald P. Sullivan
____
Donald P. Sullivan
Attorneys for Defendants
LIFE
INVESTORS
INSURANCE
COMPANY
OF
AMERICA
and
TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY
12
13
14
15
16
17
Dated:
August 23, 2011
HINSHAW MARSH STILL & HINSHAW
By:___/s/ Thomas E. Still
Thomas E. Still
Attorneys for Defendant
ALLEN KAISLER-MEZA, M.D.
18
19
____
20
21
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25
August 26, 2011
Date:____________________________
_______________________________________
The Hon. Edward J. Davila
United States District Judge
26
27
28
2
Case No. 5:11-cv-03217 (EJD)
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Permitting Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Telephonic Appearance at the Case Management Conference
1
2
3
4
5
6
PROOF OF SERVICE
United States District Court – Northern District of California
Guillem v. Life Investors Insurance Company of America, et al.
Case No. 5:11-cv-03217 (EJD)
I am a resident of the State of California, employed in the County of San Francisco, over the age of
eighteen years, and not a party to this action. My business address is 1050 Battery Street, San Francisco,
California 94111. On the date executed below, I will serve the following document(s):
STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S TELEPHONIC
APPEARANCE AT THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
( X ) (BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE): I caused a true and correct copy of the above-noted document to be
electronically filed using the Electronic Court Filing (“ECF”) system and service was completed by electronic means by
transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing on the registered participants of the ECF system. I served those parties who
are not registered participants of the ECF system as indicated below:
( ) (BY PERSONAL SERVICE): I caused such envelope to be delivered to a commercial messenger service with
instructions to hand deliver same to the offices of the addressee(s) below on this date.
( ) (BY MAIL) I am employed in the county where the mailing described below occurred, and am readily familiar with
the business practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service.
I placed a true copy of the specified document(s) in a sealed envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid. The
envelope(s) will be deposited with the United States Postal Service on this day in the ordinary course of business in San
Francisco, California.
( ) (BY FAX & MAIL) I caused the document(s) listed above to be served by faxing said document(s) from the fax
machine located at 1050 Battery Street, San Francisco, California, (415) 421-0259 to the fax number(s) listed at the
location(s) below. The attached report confirms said transmission was completed with no errors and all pages were
received. I also placed the document(s) in a sealed envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid and deposited the
envelope(s) with the United States Postal Service (as described in service by mail above).
SERVICE LIST:
For Defendant ALAN KAISLER-MEZA, M.D.
Thomas E. Still, Esq.
HINSHAW MARSH STILL & HINSHAW
12901 Saratoga Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070
Ph: (408) 861-6500
Fax: (408) 257-6645
email: TStill@hinshaw-law.com
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and the State of California that
the foregoing is true and correct. I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction
this service was made. Executed on August 23, 2011 in San Francisco, California.
26
27
28
3
Case No. 5:11-cv-03217 (EJD)
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Permitting Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Telephonic Appearance at the Case Management Conference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?