Guillem v. Life Insurance Company of America et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION AND ORDER Plaintiff Counsel's Telephonic Appearance for 9/16/2011 CMC re 13 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/26/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2011)

Download PDF
4 Ray Bourhis, Esq. SBN 53196 Lawrence Mann, Esq. SBN 83698 BOURHIS & MANN 1050 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 392-4660; Fax: (415) 421-0259 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff CECILE GUILLEM 1 2 3 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) LIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY ) OF AMERICA, TRANSAMERICA LIFE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ALAN ) KAISLER-MEZA, M.D., and DOES 1 – 50, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) CECILE GUILLEM, Case No.: 5:11-cv-03217 (EJD) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE: September 16, 2011 TIME: 10:00 a.m. PLACE: Ctrm. 1, 5th Floor 280 South 1st Street San Jose, CA 95113 JUDGE: The Hon. Edward J. Davila 20 21 Lawrence Mann, partner at Bourhis & Mann and attorney for Plaintiff, is scheduled to 22 appear at a settlement conference (tentative) in the morning and two case management conferences 23 with Judge Chernus in the afternoon at the Marin County Superior Court on September 16, 2011, 24 the same date set for the Case Management Conference in the above-captioned matter. Therefore, 25 counsel respectfully requests the Court’s permission to participate telephonically in the Sept. 16th 26 Case Management Conference. Counsel for all parties have consented to this request. 27 28 1 Case No. 5:11-cv-03217 (EJD) Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Permitting Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Telephonic Appearance at the Case Management Conference 1 STIPULATION 2 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel 3 of record, that if the Court permits, Lawrence Mann shall be permitted to participate in the 4 September 16, 2011 (10:00 a.m.) Case Management Conference via telephone. 5 Dated: August 23, 2011 BOURHIS & MANN By:___/s/ Lawrence Mann ____ Ray Bourhis, Esq. Lawrence Mann, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff CECILE GUILLEM 6 7 8 9 10 Dated: August 23, 2011 11 WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER, LLP By:___/s/ Donald P. Sullivan ____ Donald P. Sullivan Attorneys for Defendants LIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 12 13 14 15 16 17 Dated: August 23, 2011 HINSHAW MARSH STILL & HINSHAW By:___/s/ Thomas E. Still Thomas E. Still Attorneys for Defendant ALLEN KAISLER-MEZA, M.D. 18 19 ____ 20 21 PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 August 26, 2011 Date:____________________________ _______________________________________ The Hon. Edward J. Davila United States District Judge 26 27 28 2 Case No. 5:11-cv-03217 (EJD) Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Permitting Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Telephonic Appearance at the Case Management Conference 1 2 3 4 5 6 PROOF OF SERVICE United States District Court – Northern District of California Guillem v. Life Investors Insurance Company of America, et al. Case No. 5:11-cv-03217 (EJD) I am a resident of the State of California, employed in the County of San Francisco, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to this action. My business address is 1050 Battery Street, San Francisco, California 94111. On the date executed below, I will serve the following document(s): STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ( X ) (BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE): I caused a true and correct copy of the above-noted document to be electronically filed using the Electronic Court Filing (“ECF”) system and service was completed by electronic means by transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing on the registered participants of the ECF system. I served those parties who are not registered participants of the ECF system as indicated below: ( ) (BY PERSONAL SERVICE): I caused such envelope to be delivered to a commercial messenger service with instructions to hand deliver same to the offices of the addressee(s) below on this date. ( ) (BY MAIL) I am employed in the county where the mailing described below occurred, and am readily familiar with the business practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. I placed a true copy of the specified document(s) in a sealed envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid. The envelope(s) will be deposited with the United States Postal Service on this day in the ordinary course of business in San Francisco, California. ( ) (BY FAX & MAIL) I caused the document(s) listed above to be served by faxing said document(s) from the fax machine located at 1050 Battery Street, San Francisco, California, (415) 421-0259 to the fax number(s) listed at the location(s) below. The attached report confirms said transmission was completed with no errors and all pages were received. I also placed the document(s) in a sealed envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid and deposited the envelope(s) with the United States Postal Service (as described in service by mail above). SERVICE LIST: For Defendant ALAN KAISLER-MEZA, M.D. Thomas E. Still, Esq. HINSHAW MARSH STILL & HINSHAW 12901 Saratoga Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 Ph: (408) 861-6500 Fax: (408) 257-6645 email: TStill@hinshaw-law.com I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction this service was made. Executed on August 23, 2011 in San Francisco, California. 26 27 28 3 Case No. 5:11-cv-03217 (EJD) Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Permitting Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Telephonic Appearance at the Case Management Conference

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?