Site Update Solutions LLC v. Accor North America Inc et al

Filing 572

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS BETWEEN SITE UPDATE SOLUTIONS LLC AND WAL-MART STORES, INC. WITHOUT PREJUDICE re 571 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/6/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Edward W. Goldstein (TX Bar No. 08099500) Alisa A. Lipski (TX Bar No. 24041345) Goldstein & Lipski PLLC 1177 West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas 77027 Telephone: (713) 877-1515 Facsimile: (713)877-1737 Email: egoldstein@gliplaw.com Email: alipski@gliplaw.com Victor de Gyarfas State Bar No. 24071250 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 555 South Flower Street, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2411 Tel: 213-972-4500 Fax: 213-486-0065 E-mail: vdegyarfas@foley.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Site Update Solutions LLC Attorney for Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 Site Update Solutions LLC Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 16 Adobe Systems, Incorporated et al., Defendants. 17 Case No. 4:11-cv-03306-PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS BETWEEN SITE UPDATE SOLUTIONS LLC AND WAL-MART STORES , INC. WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-CV-03306-PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WAL-MART STORES, INC WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 1 Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the terms of a 2 separate agreement, the Plaintiff, Site Update Solutions LLC (“Site Update”) and Defendant, Wal3 Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) have agreed to dismiss all claims against each other in the above4 captioned action. The parties, therefore, move this Court to dismiss the above-entitled cause and 5 all claims by Site Update against Wal-Mart and all claims by Wal-Mart against Site Update made 6 therein without prejudice. 7 The parties further move the Court to order that all costs and expenses relating to this 8 litigation (including attorney and expert fees and expenses) shall be borne solely by the party 9 incurring same. 10 So Stipulated. 11 12 13 R NIA LI A H 23 ER N C GOLDSTEIN & LIPSKI, P.L.L.C. F D IS T FOLEY & LARDNER LLPI C T O By: _/s/ Edward W. Goldstein_____________ Edward W. Goldstein (Pro Hac Vice) By: _/s/ Victor de Gyarfas ____________ Victor de Gyarfas Attorneys for Plaintiff SITE UPDATE SOLUTIONS, LLC Attorneys for Defendant WAL-MART STORES, INC. 20 22 S RT 18 21 _______________________________ Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton amilton yllis J. H United States District h Judge P Judge NO 17 19 DERED O OR IT IS S FO 6 16 DATED: December __, 2011 UNIT ED 15 RT U O PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 S DISTRICT TE C TA R 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-CV-03306-PJH -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WAL-MART STORES, INC WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 2 ATTESTATION I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B that concurrence in the electronic filing of 3 this document has been obtained from the signatories. 4 Dated: December 5, 2011 5 /s/ Edward W. Goldstein________ Edward W. Goldstein 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-CV-03306-PJH -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WAL-MART STORES, INC WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have 3 consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s ECF 4 System. 5 Dated: December 5, 2011 6 /s/ Edward W. Goldstein________ Edward W. Goldstein 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-CV-03306-PJH -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WAL-MART STORES, INC WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?