Site Update Solutions LLC v. Accor North America Inc et al

Filing 572

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS BETWEEN SITE UPDATE SOLUTIONS LLC AND WAL-MART STORES, INC. WITHOUT PREJUDICE re 571 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/6/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Edward W. Goldstein (TX Bar No. 08099500)
Alisa A. Lipski (TX Bar No. 24041345)
Goldstein & Lipski PLLC
1177 West Loop South, Suite 400
Houston, Texas 77027
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

Victor de Gyarfas
State Bar No. 24071250
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
555 South Flower Street, Suite 3500
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2411
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Site Update Solutions LLC

Attorney for Defendant
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13 Site Update Solutions LLC
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
16 Adobe Systems, Incorporated et al.,
Defendants.
17

Case No. 4:11-cv-03306-PJH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS
BETWEEN SITE UPDATE SOLUTIONS
LLC AND WAL-MART STORES , INC.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-CV-03306-PJH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WAL-MART STORES, INC WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

1

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the terms of a

2 separate agreement, the Plaintiff, Site Update Solutions LLC (“Site Update”) and Defendant, Wal3 Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) have agreed to dismiss all claims against each other in the above4 captioned action. The parties, therefore, move this Court to dismiss the above-entitled cause and
5 all claims by Site Update against Wal-Mart and all claims by Wal-Mart against Site Update made
6 therein without prejudice.
7

The parties further move the Court to order that all costs and expenses relating to this

8 litigation (including attorney and expert fees and expenses) shall be borne solely by the party
9 incurring same.
10

So Stipulated.

11
12
13

R NIA

LI
A

H

23

ER

N

C

GOLDSTEIN & LIPSKI, P.L.L.C.

F
D IS T
FOLEY & LARDNER LLPI C T O

By: _/s/ Edward W. Goldstein_____________
Edward W. Goldstein (Pro Hac Vice)

By: _/s/ Victor de Gyarfas ____________
Victor de Gyarfas

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SITE UPDATE SOLUTIONS, LLC

Attorneys for Defendant
WAL-MART STORES, INC.

20

22

S

RT

18

21

_______________________________
Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton amilton
yllis J. H
United States District h
Judge P Judge

NO

17

19

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

FO

6
16 DATED: December __, 2011

UNIT
ED

15

RT
U
O

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
14

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

R

24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-CV-03306-PJH
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WAL-MART STORES, INC WITHOUT PREJUDICE

1
2

ATTESTATION
I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B that concurrence in the electronic filing of

3 this document has been obtained from the signatories.
4 Dated: December 5, 2011
5

/s/ Edward W. Goldstein________
Edward W. Goldstein

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-CV-03306-PJH
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WAL-MART STORES, INC WITHOUT PREJUDICE

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2

The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have

3 consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s ECF
4 System.
5 Dated: December 5, 2011
6

/s/ Edward W. Goldstein________
Edward W. Goldstein

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-CV-03306-PJH
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WAL-MART STORES, INC WITHOUT PREJUDICE