Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Lai
Filing
23
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Based on the parties' Joint Case Management Statement and proposed schedule, the court has determined an appearance is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the 9/30/2011 Case Management Conference is VACATED and the part ies are ordered to comply with the following schedule: Joinder of any additional parties, or other amendments to the pleadings, is 12/12/201. Deadline to complete Private ADR by 4/13/2012. Fact Discovery cutoff 6/8/2012. Expert Discovery Cutoff 6/8/2 012. Last Date for Filing Dispositive Motions due by 4/30/2012. Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement due by 4/24/2012. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 5/4/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/27/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
11
12
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION, as receiver for
INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B.,
Case No. 5:11-cv-03313 EJD
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
13
Plaintiff(s),
14
v.
15
LUPING LAI,
16
17
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
18
This case is scheduled for a Case Management Conference on September 30, 2011. Based on the
19
parties’ Joint Case Management Statement and proposed schedule, the court has determined an
20
appearance is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the Case Management Conference is
21
VACATED and the parties are ordered to comply with the following schedule.
22
23
24
25
26
27
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the court adopts the parties’ statement of disputed factual
and legal issues as set forth in the Case Management Statement.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for joinder of any additional parties, or other
amendments to the pleadings, is December 12, 2011.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall observe the presumptive limits on
discovery set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:
28
1
Case No. 5:11-cv-03313 EJD
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any disputes with respect to discovery or disclosure are
referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall complete private mediation no later than
April 13, 2012.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following schedule shall apply to this case:
6
EVENT
DEADLINE
7
Fact Discovery Cutoff
June 8, 2012
8
Designation of Opening Experts with Reports
45 days before Expert Discovery
Cutoff
Designation of Rebuttal Experts with Reports
25 days before Expert Discovery
Cutoff
11
Expert Discovery Cutoff
June 8, 2012
12
Deadline(s) for Filing Discovery Motions
See Civil Local Rule 37-3
Deadline for Filing Dispositive Motions1
April 30, 2012
Preliminary Pretrial Conference
11:00 a.m. on May 4, 2012
Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement
April 24, 2012
9
10
13
14
15
16
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with the Standing Order re
17
Pretrial Preparation, a copy of which is available from the Clerk of the Court,2 with regard to the
18
timing and content of the Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement, and all other pretrial
19
submissions.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
Dated: September 27, 2011
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
23
24
1
25
26
27
28
This is the last date for filing dispositive motions. The actual hearing on the motion may
be noticed for a date subsequent after contacting Judge Davila's courtroom deputy.
2
A copy of Judge Davila's standing order is also available on the court's website at
www.cand.uscourts.gov by clicking first on the "Judges" button, then on Judge Davila's name, then on
the link for "Judge Davila's Standing Orders," and finally on the link for "Standing Order re Pretrial
Preparation."
2
Case No. 5:11-cv-03313 EJD
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?