Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Lai

Filing 23

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Based on the parties' Joint Case Management Statement and proposed schedule, the court has determined an appearance is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the 9/30/2011 Case Management Conference is VACATED and the part ies are ordered to comply with the following schedule: Joinder of any additional parties, or other amendments to the pleadings, is 12/12/201. Deadline to complete Private ADR by 4/13/2012. Fact Discovery cutoff 6/8/2012. Expert Discovery Cutoff 6/8/2 012. Last Date for Filing Dispositive Motions due by 4/30/2012. Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement due by 4/24/2012. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 5/4/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/27/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 12 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver for INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B., Case No. 5:11-cv-03313 EJD CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 13 Plaintiff(s), 14 v. 15 LUPING LAI, 16 17 Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 18 This case is scheduled for a Case Management Conference on September 30, 2011. Based on the 19 parties’ Joint Case Management Statement and proposed schedule, the court has determined an 20 appearance is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the Case Management Conference is 21 VACATED and the parties are ordered to comply with the following schedule. 22 23 24 25 26 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the court adopts the parties’ statement of disputed factual and legal issues as set forth in the Case Management Statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for joinder of any additional parties, or other amendments to the pleadings, is December 12, 2011. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall observe the presumptive limits on discovery set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: 28 1 Case No. 5:11-cv-03313 EJD CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any disputes with respect to discovery or disclosure are referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall complete private mediation no later than April 13, 2012. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following schedule shall apply to this case: 6 EVENT DEADLINE 7 Fact Discovery Cutoff June 8, 2012 8 Designation of Opening Experts with Reports 45 days before Expert Discovery Cutoff Designation of Rebuttal Experts with Reports 25 days before Expert Discovery Cutoff 11 Expert Discovery Cutoff June 8, 2012 12 Deadline(s) for Filing Discovery Motions See Civil Local Rule 37-3 Deadline for Filing Dispositive Motions1 April 30, 2012 Preliminary Pretrial Conference 11:00 a.m. on May 4, 2012 Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement April 24, 2012 9 10 13 14 15 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with the Standing Order re 17 Pretrial Preparation, a copy of which is available from the Clerk of the Court,2 with regard to the 18 timing and content of the Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement, and all other pretrial 19 submissions. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: September 27, 2011 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 23 24 1 25 26 27 28 This is the last date for filing dispositive motions. The actual hearing on the motion may be noticed for a date subsequent after contacting Judge Davila's courtroom deputy. 2 A copy of Judge Davila's standing order is also available on the court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov by clicking first on the "Judges" button, then on Judge Davila's name, then on the link for "Judge Davila's Standing Orders," and finally on the link for "Standing Order re Pretrial Preparation." 2 Case No. 5:11-cv-03313 EJD CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?