Maravilla v. Swarthout
Filing
14
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS. Petitioner shall file a opposition no later than September 27, 2012, thirty (30) days after the motion to dismiss was served. Respondent shall file a reply no more than fifteen (15) days thereafter. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/31/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
JAVIER RUIZ MARAVILLA,
Petitioner,
12
13
vs.
14
G. SWARTHOUT, Warden,
15
Respondent.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 11-03385 EJD (PR)
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO
MOTION TO DISMISS
17
18
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas
19
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his state conviction. (See Docket No. 1.)
20
The Court ordered Respondent to show cause why Petitioner's writ should not be granted.
21
(See Docket No. 7.) Respondent requested an extension of time to file a motion to dismiss.
22
(See Docket No. 8.) The Court granted Respondent’s motion, and set June 4, 2012 as the due
23
date for the motion to dismiss. (See Docket No. 9.) Respondent filed a motion to dismiss on
24
May 1, 2012. (See Docket No. 10.)
25
he had not received a responsive pleading from Respondent. (See Docket No. 12.) Petitioner
26
also filed a notice of change of address. (See Docket No. 11.) On August 28, 2012,
27
Respondent filed an amended declaration of service indicating that his motion to dismiss was
28
served on Petitioner at his new address. (See Docket No. 13.)
On August 27, 2012, Petitioner notified the Court that
Order Granting Ext. of Time to File Opp.
N:\Pro - Se & Death Penalty Orders\August 2012\03385Maravilla_eot.opp.wpd
1
In the interest of justice, the Court GRANTS Petitioner an extension of time in which
2
to file an opposition to Respondent’s motion to dismiss. Petitioner shall file a opposition no
3
later than September 27, 2012, thirty (30) days after the motion to dismiss was served.
4
Respondent shall file a reply no more than fifteen (15) days thereafter.
5
6
7
DATED:
8/31/2012
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Granting Ext. of Time to File Opp.
N:\Pro - Se & Death Penalty Orders\August 2012\03385Maravilla_eot.opp.wpd
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAVIER RUIZ MARAVILLA,
Case Number: CV11-03385 EJD
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
G. SWARTHOUT et al,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on September 4, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Javier Ruiz Maravilla G-14768
Deuel Vocational Institution
P. O. Box 600
Tracy, CA 95378-0600
Dated: September 4, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
/s/ By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?