Maravilla v. Swarthout

Filing 14

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS. Petitioner shall file a opposition no later than September 27, 2012, thirty (30) days after the motion to dismiss was served. Respondent shall file a reply no more than fifteen (15) days thereafter. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/31/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 JAVIER RUIZ MARAVILLA, Petitioner, 12 13 vs. 14 G. SWARTHOUT, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 11-03385 EJD (PR) ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS 17 18 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas 19 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his state conviction. (See Docket No. 1.) 20 The Court ordered Respondent to show cause why Petitioner's writ should not be granted. 21 (See Docket No. 7.) Respondent requested an extension of time to file a motion to dismiss. 22 (See Docket No. 8.) The Court granted Respondent’s motion, and set June 4, 2012 as the due 23 date for the motion to dismiss. (See Docket No. 9.) Respondent filed a motion to dismiss on 24 May 1, 2012. (See Docket No. 10.) 25 he had not received a responsive pleading from Respondent. (See Docket No. 12.) Petitioner 26 also filed a notice of change of address. (See Docket No. 11.) On August 28, 2012, 27 Respondent filed an amended declaration of service indicating that his motion to dismiss was 28 served on Petitioner at his new address. (See Docket No. 13.) On August 27, 2012, Petitioner notified the Court that Order Granting Ext. of Time to File Opp. N:\Pro - Se & Death Penalty Orders\August 2012\03385Maravilla_eot.opp.wpd 1 In the interest of justice, the Court GRANTS Petitioner an extension of time in which 2 to file an opposition to Respondent’s motion to dismiss. Petitioner shall file a opposition no 3 later than September 27, 2012, thirty (30) days after the motion to dismiss was served. 4 Respondent shall file a reply no more than fifteen (15) days thereafter. 5 6 7 DATED: 8/31/2012 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting Ext. of Time to File Opp. N:\Pro - Se & Death Penalty Orders\August 2012\03385Maravilla_eot.opp.wpd 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAVIER RUIZ MARAVILLA, Case Number: CV11-03385 EJD Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. G. SWARTHOUT et al, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on September 4, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Javier Ruiz Maravilla G-14768 Deuel Vocational Institution P. O. Box 600 Tracy, CA 95378-0600 Dated: September 4, 2012 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk /s/ By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?