Bailey et al v. Narayan et al
Filing
9
ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED TO A DISTRICT JUDGE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/26/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2011)
1
** E-filed August 26, 2011 **
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
For the Northern District of California
NOT FOR CITATION
8
United States District Court
7
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
KENNETH S. BAILEY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
No. C11-03389 HRL
ORDER THAT CASE BE
REASSIGNED TO A DISTRICT
JUDGE
v.
14
KRIS NARAYAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
____________________________________/
16
17
This civil case was randomly assigned to this Court for all purposes including trial. On
18
August 4, 2011, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Docket No. 6. On August 10, 2011, pursuant
19
to this District’s Civil Local Rule 73-1, this Court instructed all parties who had not done so to file
20
either (1) a Consent to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge or (2) a Declination to
21
Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge,
22
no later than August 22, 2011. Docket No. 7. Since neither Plaintiff nor Defendant Langhaw has
23
done so, this Court ORDERS the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case to a district court judge. All
24
current dates and deadlines, including the September 20, 2011 hearing on Defendants’ motion, are
25
VACATED.
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 26, 2011
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
C11-03389 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to:
2
Elaine Lucy Morinelli
3
Notice will be mailed to:
4
Kenneth S. Bailey
5201 Great America Parkway
Suite 320
Santa Clara, CA 95054
5
elainesmylawyer@comcast.net
6
7
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?