Innovative Automation, LLC v. Primera Technology, Inc

Filing 26

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION UNDER CIVIL L.R. 3-12(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/4/11. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2011)

Download PDF
1 ** E-filed October 11, 2011 ** 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 For the Northern District of California NOT FOR CITATION 8 United States District Court 7 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 INNOVATIVE AUTOMATION, LLC, No. C11-03409 Plaintiffs, 12 ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION UNDER CIVIL L.R. 3-12(b) v. 13 PRIMERA TECHNOLOGY, INC, 14 15 Defendants. ____________________________________/ 16 Excluding Innovative Automation LLC v. Microtech Systems, 4:11-cv-01299, which, 17 according to plaintiff’s counsel, is settling, there are four other pending cases in this district which 18 may be related to the present one. They are: 19 Innovative Automation LLC v. Mediatechnics Systems, Inc., 5:11-cv-03410 HRL 20 Innovative Automation LLC v. DisCopyLabs, 3:11-cv-03411 CRB 21 Innovative Automation LLC v. Acutrack Inc., 5:11-cv-3412 LHK 22 Rimage Corp. v. Innovative Automation LLC, 4:11-cv-04224 DMR 23 Accordingly, under the authority of Civil L.R. 3-12(c), the parties in the present case are ordered to 24 file forthwith an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related (Civil. L.R. 25 3-12(b)). 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 4, 2011 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 C11-3713 Notice will be electronically mailed to: 2 Adam Gutride Seth Adam Safier Todd Michael Kennedy Victoria L.H. Booke Martin R. Glick Edward Andrew Bayley 3 4 5 6 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. 7 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?