Innovative Automation, LLC v. Primera Technology, Inc

Filing 38

ORDER SEVERING A CONSOLIDATED CASE AND DIRECTING REASSIGNMENT TO A DISTRICT JUDGE. C11-03410, Innovative Automation v. Mediatechnic Systems, Inc. et al. is hereby severed and shall be reassigned to a district judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/18/12. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012)

1

** E-filed January 18, 2012 **

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

For the Northern District of California

NOT FOR CITATION

8

United States District Court

7

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

INNOVATIVE AUTOMATION, LLC,
Plaintiff,

12
v.
13

MEDIATECHNIC SYSTEMS, INC.; et al.,

No. C11-03410 HRL
ORDER SEVERING A
CONSOLIDATED CASE AND
DIRECTING REASSIGNMENT TO A
DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15

Defendants.
____________________________________/

16

INNOVATIVE AUTOMATION, LLC,

17

No. C11-03411 HRL

Plaintiff,
v.

18
DISCOPYLABS,
19
20

Defendant.
____________________________________/

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

INNOVATIVE AUTOMATION, LLC,

No. C11-03412 HRL

Plaintiff,
v.
ACUTRACK, INC.,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
RIMAGE CORPORATION,

28

Plaintiff,
v.

No. C11-04224 HRL

1
INNOVATIVE AUTOMATION, LLC,
2
3

Defendant.
____________________________________/

4

As of December 1, 2011, all parties who had appeared in the above-captioned patent cases

5

had consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, and, as a result of a related case ruling by the

6

undersigned, all were assigned to this court. All were then consolidated for purposes of claims

7

construction, and this court issued a scheduling order. 1

Complaint in action C11-03410 that added additional defendants. Some of these defendants have

10

For the Northern District of California

However, upon plaintiff’s motion this court permitted the filing of a First Amended

9

United States District Court

8

appeared in the action and filed a declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Accordingly,

11

Innovative Automation, LLC v. Mediatechnic Solutions, et al., C11-03410, is hereby severed from

12

the other consolidated cases so that it may be reassigned to a district judge.

13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 18, 2012

15

HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Innovative Automation v. Primera, C11-03409-HRL, was also consolidated for claims
construction, but since then it has settled and been dismissed,
2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12
13
14

C11-03409, C11-03410, C11-03411, C11-03412, C11-04224 Notice will be electronically mailed
to:
Adam Gutride
[e-mail]
Seth Adam Safier
[e-mail]
Todd Michael Kennedy
[e-mail]
Victoria L.H. Booke
[e-mail]
Martin R. Glick
[e-mail]
Edward Andrew Bayley
[e-mail]
Jeffrey M. Fisher
[e-mail]
Julie B. Wahlstrand
[e-mail]
Clifford R. Horner
[e-mail]
Sterling Arthur Brennan
[e-mail]
Thomas Dubberke
[e-mail]
Tyson Keith Hottinger
[e-mail]
Charles J. Veverka
[e-mail]
Sterling Arthur Brennan
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Jen-Feng Lee
Notice will be provided by mail to:
Thomas E. Cherry
Coptech Digital, Inc.
100 Cimmings Park Woburn, MA 01801

15

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not

16

registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4