Sexton v. San Francisco Sheriff Department et al

Filing 19

ORDER Providing Plaintiff Notice and Warning; Scheduling Supplemental Briefing. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 7/30/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11

MARVIN R. SEXTON, JR.,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14

v.
SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF
DEPARTMENT, et al.,

15
Defendants.
16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. C 11-3460 RMW (PR)
ORDER PROVIDING PLAINTIFF
NOTICE AND WARNING;
SCHEDULING SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

18

Defendants have moved to dismiss this action for failure to exhaust. Although given the

19

opportunity, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, No. 09-15548,

20

slip op. 7871, 7884-85 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012), plaintiff is given the following notice and warning

21

for a second time:

22

If defendants file an unenumerated motion to dismiss for failure to

23

exhaust, they are seeking to have your case dismissed. If the motion is

24

granted it will end your case.

25

You have the right to present any evidence you may have which tends to

26

show that you did exhaust your administrative remedies. Such evidence may be in

27

the form of declarations (statements signed under penalty of perjury) or

28
Order Providing Plaintiff Notice and Warning; Scheduling Supplemental Briefing
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR.11\Sexton460woods.wpd

1

authenticated documents, that is, documents accompanied by a declaration showing

2

where they came from and why they are authentic, or other sworn papers, such as

3

answers to interrogatories or depositions.

4
5
6

If defendants file a motion to dismiss and it is granted, your case will
be dismissed and there will be no trial.
See also Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 n.4 (9th Cir. 2003).

7

Although the deadline for plaintiff to file an opposition has already passed, in light of

8

Woods, plaintiff may file a supplemental opposition within 14 days of this order. Defendants

9

shall file a supplemental reply to any supplemental opposition within 7 days thereafter.

10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Providing Plaintiff Notice and Warning; Scheduling Supplemental Briefing
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR.11\Sexton460woods.wpd

2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARVIN R. SEXTON JR,

Case Number: CV11-03460 RMW

Plaintiff,

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

v.
SF SHERIFF DEPT. et al,
Defendant.

/

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on July 31, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Marvin R Sexton
10686200
307 Oeana Drive
Pittsburg, CA 94565
Dated: July 31, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk