Berton v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Filing
21
ORDER Regarding Amended Answer and Counterclaim. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/4/2011. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2011)
1
2
3
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
GLENN R. KANTOR Bar No. 122643
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, CA 91324
Telephone: (818) 886-2525
Facsimile: (818) 534-0567
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KRISTI BERTON
SEDGWICK LLP
REBECCA A. HULL Bar No. 99802
rebecca.hull@sedgwicklaw.com
ERIN A. CORNELL Bar No. 227135
erin.cornell@sedgwicklaw.com
333 Bush Street, 30th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104-2834
Telephone: (415) 781-7900
Facsimile: (415) 781-2635
Attorneys for Defendant
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Case No. 5:11-cv-03509 LHK
KRISTI BERTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR DEFENDANT
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY TO FILE AN AMENDED
ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SF/2562820v1
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDED ANSWER & COUNTERCLAIM
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between plaintiff Kristi Berton
2
and defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), through their attorneys of
3
record herein, that MetLife may file the proposed amended answer and counterclaim, attached as
4
Exhibit 1 to this stipulation.
5
6
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: October 24, 2011
KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
7
8
By: /s/ Glenn R. Kantor (as authorized 10/24/11)
Glenn R. Kantor
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KRISTI BERTON
9
10
11
12
DATED: October 24, 2011
SEDGWICK LLP
13
14
By: /s/ Rebecca A. Hull
Rebecca A. Hull
Erin A. Cornell
Attorneys for Defendant
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
15
16
17
18
19
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
DATED: November 4, 2011
22
23
Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
SF/2562820v1
2
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDED ANSWER & COUNTERCLAIM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?