Berton v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Filing 21

ORDER Regarding Amended Answer and Counterclaim. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/4/2011. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP GLENN R. KANTOR Bar No. 122643 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, CA 91324 Telephone: (818) 886-2525 Facsimile: (818) 534-0567 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff KRISTI BERTON SEDGWICK LLP REBECCA A. HULL Bar No. 99802 rebecca.hull@sedgwicklaw.com ERIN A. CORNELL Bar No. 227135 erin.cornell@sedgwicklaw.com 333 Bush Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104-2834 Telephone: (415) 781-7900 Facsimile: (415) 781-2635 Attorneys for Defendant METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Case No. 5:11-cv-03509 LHK KRISTI BERTON, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DEFENDANT METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY TO FILE AN AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SF/2562820v1 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDED ANSWER & COUNTERCLAIM 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between plaintiff Kristi Berton 2 and defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), through their attorneys of 3 record herein, that MetLife may file the proposed amended answer and counterclaim, attached as 4 Exhibit 1 to this stipulation. 5 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: October 24, 2011 KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 7 8 By: /s/ Glenn R. Kantor (as authorized 10/24/11) Glenn R. Kantor Attorneys for Plaintiff KRISTI BERTON 9 10 11 12 DATED: October 24, 2011 SEDGWICK LLP 13 14 By: /s/ Rebecca A. Hull Rebecca A. Hull Erin A. Cornell Attorneys for Defendant METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 15 16 17 18 19 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 DATED: November 4, 2011 22 23 Honorable Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 SF/2562820v1 2 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDED ANSWER & COUNTERCLAIM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?