GSI Technology, Inc. v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
Filing
44
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (MODIFIED BY THE COURT). Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on December 4, 2012. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP
ARTHUR J. SHARTSIS (Bar #51549)
ashartsis@sflaw.com
MARY JO SHARTSIS (Bar #55194)
mshartsis@sflaw.com
ROBERT E. SCHABERG (Bar #81430)
rschaberg@sflaw.com
One Maritime Plaza, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 421-6500
Facsimile: (415) 421-2922
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
13
14
GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
15
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,
18
*E-FILED: December 4, 2012*
Case No. 5:11-cv-03613-EJD
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING
PATENTS, HIGHLY SENSITIVE
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
AND/OR TRADE SECRETS
(MODIFIED BY THE COURT)
Defendant.
19
20
Plaintiff GSI Technology, Inc. and Defendant Cypress Semiconductor Corporation hereby
21
22
stipulate and agree as follows:
23
1.
PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
24
Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of
25
confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public
26
disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted.
27
Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following
28
Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from
2
public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to
3
confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as
4
set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file
5
confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62 set forth the
6
procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks
7
permission from the Court to file material under seal.
8
2.
9
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
10
11
DEFINITIONS
2.1
Challenging Party:
a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of
information or items under this Order.
2.2
“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is
12
generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule
13
of Civil Procedure 26(c), including without limitation: (1) information protected pursuant to
14
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2; (2) information protected by any federal, California, or other
15
privacy statute, such as the California Right to Financial Privacy Act; and (3) information
16
protected by an existing contractual obligation requiring the Designating Party to maintain the
17
confidentiality of the information. Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude a Party from redacting
18
personal information, including social security numbers or dates of birth, as required by
19
governing law or contract or otherwise pursuant to the applicable policies of the Party..
20
2.3
Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel as
21
well as their support staff, including but not limited to attorneys, paralegals, secretaries, law
22
clerks, and investigators.
23
2.4
Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that
24
it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
25
CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
26
27
2.5
Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, including from any
non-party, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained
28
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
-2STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
(including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or
2
generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter.
3
2.6
Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to
4
the litigation, along with his or her employees and support personnel, who (1) has been retained
5
by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action, (2) is not a
6
past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, is
7
not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor.
8
2.7
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or
Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another
10
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
9
Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by
11
less restrictive means.
12
13
2.8
include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.
14
15
House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party. House Counsel does not
2.9
Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal
entity not named as a Party.
16
2.10
Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys, as well as their support staff, including but
17
not limited to paralegals, secretaries, law clerks and investigators) who are not employees of a
18
Party but are retained by a Party to represent or advise that Party and have appeared in this action
19
on behalf of that Party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that
20
Party.
21
22
23
24
25
2.11
Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,
consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs).
2.12
Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery
Material in this action.
2.13
Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services
26
(e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and
27
organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and
28
subcontractors.
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
-3STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
2.14
Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as
“CONFIDENTIAL,” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
3
2.15
Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a
4
Producing Party.
5
3.
6
SCOPE
3.1
The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected
Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected
8
Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any
9
testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected
10
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
7
Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the
11
following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure
12
to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party
13
as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the
14
public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party
15
prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who
16
obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating
17
Party; and (c) any information obtained outside of litigation with the consent of the Producing
18
Party and not subject to a Non-Disclosure Agreement. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall
19
be governed by a separate agreement or order.
20
21
22
3.2
Nothing in this Order shall prevent or restrict a Producing Party’s own disclosure
or use of its own Protected Material for any purpose.
3.3
Nothing in this Order shall be construed to prejudice any Party’s rights to use any
23
Protected Material in Court or in any Court filing with the written consent of the Designating
24
Party or by order of the Court.
25
3.4
This Order is without prejudice to the right of any Party to seek further or
26
additional protection of any Discovery Material or to modify this Order in any way, including,
27
without limitation, an order that certain matter not be produced at all.
28
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
-4STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
3.5
Nothing in this Order shall be construed to prevent Outside Counsel of Record or
2
House Counsel from advising their clients with respect to this case in whole or in part upon
3
Protected Materials, provided the Protected Materials are not disclosed by such Counsel except as
4
provided in this Order.
5
4.
DURATION
Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by
7
this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court
8
order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all
9
claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after
10
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
6
the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action,
11
including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to
12
applicable law.
13
5.
14
DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1
Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party
15
or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care
16
to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards.
17
To the extent it is practical to do so, the Designating Party must designate for protection only
18
those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify—so that
19
other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not
20
warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.
21
Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are
22
shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to
23
unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary
24
expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.
25
If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated
26
for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify for the level of protection
27
initially asserted, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is
28
withdrawing the mistaken designation.
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
-5STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
5.2
Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order
2
(see, e.g., second paragraph of Section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered,
3
Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so
4
designated before the material is disclosed or produced.
5
Designation in conformity with this Order requires:
6
(a)
for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents,
but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing
8
Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’
9
EYES ONLY” to each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the
10
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
7
material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the
11
protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for
12
each portion, the level of protection being asserted.
13
A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection
14
need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which
15
material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all
16
of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—
17
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants
18
copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof,
19
qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the
20
Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
21
CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) to each page that contains Protected
22
Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the
23
Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate
24
markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being
25
asserted.
26
(b)
for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings,
27
the Designating Party may identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or
28
other proceeding, all protected testimony and specify the level of protection being asserted.
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
-6STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection
2
and it appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the
3
Designating Party may invoke on the record (before the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding
4
is concluded) a right to have up to 21 days to identify the specific portions of the testimony as to
5
which protection is sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted. Only those
6
portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the 21 days shall
7
be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. Pending designation as set forth
8
above,
9
CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” information. Alternatively, a Designating
10
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
1
Party may specify, at the deposition or up to 21 days afterwards if that period is properly invoked,
11
that
12
CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
the
the
entire
entire
transcript,
transcript
including
shall
be
exhibits,
treated
as
shall
be
deemed
“CONFIDENTIAL”
as
or
“HIGHLY
“HIGHLY
13
Parties shall give the other parties notice if they reasonably expect a deposition, hearing or
14
other proceeding to include Protected Material so that the other parties can ensure that only
15
authorized individuals who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”
16
(Exhibit A) are present at those proceedings. The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition
17
shall not in any way affect its designation as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
18
CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
19
Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an obvious legend on the title page
20
that the transcript contains Protected Material, and the title page shall be followed by a list of all
21
pages (including line numbers as appropriate) that have been designated as Protected Material and
22
the level of protection being asserted by the Designating Party. The Designating Party shall
23
inform the court reporter of these requirements. Any transcript that is prepared before the
24
expiration of a 21-day period for designation shall be treated during that period as if it had been
25
designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” in its entirety unless
26
otherwise agreed. After the expiration of that period, the transcript shall be treated only as
27
actually designated. If any portion of a videotaped deposition is designated, the original and all
28
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
-7STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
copies of any videocassette, videotape, DVD or other media container shall be labeled with the
2
appropriate legend.
3
Any Protected Material that is used in the taking of a deposition shall remain subject to
4
the provisions of this Order, along with the transcript pages and videotape of the deposition
5
testimony dealing with such Protected Material. Counsel for any Producing Party shall have the
6
right to exclude from oral depositions, other than the deponent and deponent’s counsel, any
7
person who is not authorized by this Protective Order to receive or access Protected Material
8
based on the designation of such Protected Material. Such right of exclusion shall be applicable
9
only during periods of examination or testimony regarding such Protected Material.
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
10
(c)
for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any
11
other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the
12
container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL”
13
or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only a portion or portions
14
of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall
15
identify the protected portion(s) and specify the level of protection being asserted.
16
5.3
Inadvertent Failures to Designate.
If a Producing Party discovers that
17
“CONFIDENTIAL”
18
information or items that it produced were not designated as Protected Material, or that it
19
produced information or items that were designated as Protected Material but had designated
20
them in the incorrect category, the Producing Party may notify all other Parties of the error and
21
identify the affected information or items and their new designation or re-designation. Thereafter,
22
the information or items so designated or re-designated will be treated as Protected Material.
23
After providing such notice, the Producing Party shall provide re-labeled copies of the
24
information or items to the Receiving Party reflecting the change in designation.
or
“HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’
EYES
ONLY”
25
A timely corrected inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items does not,
26
standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such
27
material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable
28
efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. Upon
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
-8STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
receiving the Protected Material with the correct confidentiality designation, the Receiving Party
2
shall return or securely destroy, at the Receiving Party’s option, all Discovery Material
3
reasonably accessible to the Receiving Party that was not designated properly. Unauthorized or
4
inadvertent disclosure does not change the status of Discovery Material or waive the right to hold
5
the disclosed document or information as Protected Material.
6
6.
7
CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1
Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of
confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality
9
designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic
10
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
8
burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to
11
challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the
12
original designation is disclosed.
13
6.2
Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution
14
process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis
15
for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written
16
notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this
17
specific paragraph of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in
18
good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other
19
forms of communication are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In
20
conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality
21
designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the
22
designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered,
23
to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next
24
stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or
25
establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in
26
a timely manner.
27
6.3
28
Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court
parties shall comply with the undersigned's Standing Order re Civil
intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
-9STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Discovery Disputes
1
Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, if
2
applicable) within 21 days of the initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties
3
6
agreeing that the meet and confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier.
Any Discovery Dispute Joint Report ("DDJR") shall affirm that
Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has
have been satisfied.
complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph ^. Failure by
seek judicial intervention
the Designating Party to make such a motion including the required declaration within 21 days (or
7
14 days, if applicable) shall automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each
8
10
challenged designation. The parties may stipulate without court order to amend the time period
seek relief with
within which a motion shall be filed. In addition, the Challenging Party may file a motion
respect to
challenging a confidentiality designation at any time if there is good cause for doing so, including
11
a challenge to the designation of a deposition transcript or any portions thereof. Any motion
12
brought pursuant to this provision must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that
13
the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed by the preceding
14
paragraph.
4
5
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
9
15
The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating
16
Party. Frivolous challenges and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose
17
unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to
18
19
sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to
seek relief
file a motion to retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the
20
material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s
21
designation until the Court rules on the challenge.
22
7.
23
ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
7.1
Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed
24
or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting,
25
defending, or attempting to settle this litigation or related appellate proceeding, and not for any
26
other purpose whatsoever. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of
27
persons and under the conditions described in this Order.
When the litigation has been
28
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
- 10 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of Section 13 below (FINAL
2
DISPOSITION).
3
4
5
Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and
in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.
7.2
Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items.
Unless otherwise
6
ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may
7
disclose any information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:
8
(a)
the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as
non-attorney employees and contractors of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is
10
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
9
reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation and who have signed the
11
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A;
12
(b)
current or former officers, directors, and employees (including House
13
Counsel) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and
14
who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
15
(c)
Experts (as defined in this Order) retained by the Receiving Party to assist
16
in this action, provided that disclosure is only to the extent reasonably necessary to perform such
17
services and provided that such Expert has signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be
18
Bound” (Exhibit A);
19
(d)
the Court and its personnel;
20
(e)
court reporters, stenographers, videographers retained to record testimony
21
in this action and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and Professional Vendors to
22
whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the
23
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
24
(f)
during their testimony or preparation for their testimony, witnesses in the
25
action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment
26
and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or
27
ordered by the Court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that
28
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
- 11 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be
2
disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order.
3
4
(g)
custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information;
5
6
(h)
(i)
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her staff, who
have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); and
9
10
mock jurors who have signed the “Acknowledgement and
Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
7
8
the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a
(j)
7.3
any other person with the prior written consent of the Producing Party.
Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
11
Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the
12
Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY
13
CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to:
14
(a)
Persons designated in Sections 7.2(d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i) and (j);
15
(b)
the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, including
16
attorneys who are principals or employees of said Outside Counsel of Record, provided that such
17
Outside Counsel is not involved in competitive decision-making on behalf of a Party or a
18
competitor of a Party, to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this
19
litigation, as well as non-attorney employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is
20
reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation and who have signed the
21
“Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A;
22
(c)
Designated House Counsel of the Receiving Party, (1) who have no
23
involvement in competitive decision-making, (2) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for
24
this litigation, (3) who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”
25
(Exhibit A), and (4) as to whom the procedures set forth in Section 7.4(a), below, have been
26
followed;
27
28
(d)
Experts (as defined in this Order) retained by the Receiving Party to assist
in this action, provided that disclosure is only to the extent reasonably necessary to perform such
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
- 12 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
services, that such Expert is not involved in competitive decision-making on behalf of a Party or a
2
competitor of a Party, that such Expert has signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be
3
Bound” (Exhibit A), and that the procedures set forth in Section 7.4(b) below have been followed;
4
and
5
6
7
(e)
the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a
custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.
7.4
Procedures
for
Approving
or
Objecting
to
Disclosure
of
“HIGHLY
8
CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items to Designated House
9
Counsel or Experts.
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
10
(a)
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or agreed to in writing by the
11
Designating Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to Designated House Counsel any information or
12
item that has been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
13
pursuant to Section 7.3(c) first must make a written request to the Designating Party that (1) sets
14
forth the full name of the Designated House Counsel and the city and state of his or her residence,
15
and (2) describes the Designated House Counsel’s current and reasonably foreseeable future
16
primary job duties and responsibilities in sufficient detail to determine if House Counsel is
17
involved, or may become involved, in any competitive decision-making.
18
(b)
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or agreed to in writing by the
19
Designating Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an Expert (as defined in this Order) any
20
information or item that has been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’
21
EYES ONLY” pursuant to Section 7.3(d) first must make a written request to the Designating
22
Party that (1) identifies the general categories of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’
23
EYES ONLY” information that the Receiving Party seeks permission to disclose to the Expert
24
without disclosure of the identity of the Expert as long as the Expert is not a current officer,
25
director, or employee of a competitor of a Party or anticipated to become one.
26
(c)
A Party that makes a request and provides the information specified in the
27
preceding respective paragraphs may disclose the subject Protected Material to the identified
28
Designated House Counsel or Expert unless, within 14 days of delivering the request, the Party
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
- 13 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
receives a written objection from the Designating Party. Any such objection must set forth in
2
detail the grounds on which it is based.
3
4
5
6
7
(d)
A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with
the Designating Party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to resolve the matter by
parties
agreement within seven days of the written objection. If no agreement is reached, the Party
shall comply with the undersigned's Standing Order re Civil Discovery Disputes.
seeking to make the disclosure to Designated House Counsel or Expert may file a motion as
9
circumstances with specificity, set forth in detail the reasons why the disclosure to the Designated
10
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
8
provided in Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order
DDJR
62, if applicable) seeking permission from the Court to do so. Any such motion must describe the
House Counsel or Expert is reasonably necessary, assess the risk of harm that the disclosure
11
would entail, and suggest any additional means that could be used to reduce that risk. In addition,
12
any such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration describing the parties’ efforts
13
to resolve the matter by agreement (i.e., the extent and the content of the meet and confer
14
discussions) and setting forth the reasons advanced by the Designating Party for its refusal to
15
approve the disclosure.
16
In any such proceeding, the Party opposing disclosure to Designated House Counsel or
17
Expert shall bear the burden of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail
18
(under the safeguards proposed) outweighs the Receiving Party’s need to disclose the Protected
19
Material to its Designated House Counsel or Expert.
20
21
8.
PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN
OTHER LITIGATION
22
If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels
23
disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” or
24
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” that Party must:
25
26
27
28
(a)
within three business days notify in writing the Designating Party. Such
notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order;
(b)
promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to
issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
- 14 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
subject to this Protective Order.
2
Protective Order; and
3
4
(c)
Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated
cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by
the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.
If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the
6
subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as
7
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” before a
8
determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained
9
the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of
10
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
5
seeking protection in that court of its Protected Material, and nothing in these provisions should
11
be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful
12
directive from another court. See Paragraph 14.
13
14
9.
15
A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN
THIS LITIGATION
(a)
The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-
16
Party in this action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—
17
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” Such information produced by Non-Parties in connection with
18
this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these
19
provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections.
20
(b)
In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to
21
produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession or control, and the Party is
22
subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential
23
information, then the Party shall:
24
1.
promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party
25
that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-
26
Party;
27
28
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
- 15 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2.
promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated
2
Protective Order in this litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific
3
description of the information requested; and
4
5
3.
make the information requested available for inspection by the
Non-Party.
6
(c)
If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this Court
within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may
8
produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the
9
Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information
10
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
7
in its possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party
11
before a determination by the Court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall
12
13
bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in this Court of its Protected Material.See
Paragraph 14.
10.
UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
14
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected
15
Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective
16
Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the
17
unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the
18
Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were
19
made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the
20
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
21
22
11.
INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE
PROTECTED MATERIAL
23
The inadvertent production of material subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege, work
24
product protection or other privilege or protection shall not constitute automatic waiver of such
25
privilege or protection pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502. When a Producing Party gives
26
notice to a Receiving Party that certain inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of
27
privilege or other protection, the obligations of the Receiving Party are those set forth in Federal
28
Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B).
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
This provision is not intended to modify whatever
- 16 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior
2
privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties
3
reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a communication or information covered by the
4
attorney-client privilege or work product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement
5
in the stipulated protective order submitted to the Court.
6
12.
7
8
9
MISCELLANEOUS
12.1
Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to
seek its modification by the Court in the future.
12.2
Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
10
Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any
11
information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly,
12
no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material
13
covered by this Protective Order.
14
12.3
Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party
15
or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in
16
the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any
17
Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62. Protected
18
Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the
19
specific Protected Material at issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, a
20
sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing that the Protected Material at issue is
21
privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a
22
Receiving Party's request to file Protected Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule
23
79-5(d) and General Order 62 is denied by the Court, then the Receiving Party may file the
24
Protected Material in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) unless otherwise
25
instructed by the Court.
26
12.4
Termination of the Action and Retention of Jurisdiction. The Parties agree that the
27
terms of this Protective Order shall survive and remain in effect after the Final Disposition of this
28
action as defined in Section 4 (DURATION). The Court shall retain jurisdiction after Final
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
- 17 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
Disposition to hear and resolve any disputes arising out of this Protective Order for a period of six
2
months.
3
12.5
Successors. This Order shall be binding upon the Parties hereto, their attorneys,
4
and their successors, executors, personal representatives, administrators, legal representatives,
5
assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, employees, agents, retained consultants and experts, and any
6
persons or organizations over which they have direct control.
7
12.6
Modification by Court. This Order is subject to further court order based upon
8
public policy or other considerations, and the Court may modify this Order sua sponte in the
9
interests of justice. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California is
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
10
responsible for the interpretation and enforcement of this Order.
11
Protected Material, however designated, produced under the protection of this Order shall be
12
resolved by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
13
12.7
All disputes concerning
Discovery Rules Remain Unchanged. Identification of any individual pursuant to
14
this Order does not make that individual available for deposition or any other form of discovery
15
outside of the restrictions and procedures of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules
16
for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, or the Court’s own
17
orders.
18
13.
FINAL DISPOSITION
19
Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in Section 4
20
(DURATION), each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or
21
destroy such material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies,
22
abstracts, compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the
23
Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party
24
must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to
25
the Designating Party) by the 60-day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate)
26
all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party
27
has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing
28
or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
- 18 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing
2
transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports,
3
attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain
4
Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain
5
subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4.*
6
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
DATED:
November 1, 2012
/s/ Mary Jo Shartsis
Mary Jo Shartsis
Shartsis Friese LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff GSI Technology, Inc.
DATED:
November 1, 2012
/s/ Lee H. Rubin
Lee H. Rubin
Mayer Brown LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
8
9
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
10
11
12
13
14
AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT,
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,^ IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
4
DATED: December ___, 2012
16
Howard R. Lloyd
United States Magistrate Judge
17
18
19
20
*14. In the event of any discovery or disclosure dispute, the parties and any
affected non-parties shall comply with the undersigned's Standing Order re
Civil Discovery Disputes.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
- 19 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
EXHIBIT A
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
2
I,
3
__________________________________________________________________
[name and full address and telephone number], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read
5
in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States
6
District Court for the Northern District of California on __________ in the case of GSI
7
Technology, Inc. v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Case No. 5:11-cv-03613-EJD. I agree
8
to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I
9
understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and
10
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
4
punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner
11
any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity
12
except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order.
13
I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the
14
Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective
15
Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.
16
I hereby appoint ____________________ [name and full address and telephone number]
17
as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings
18
related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.
19
Date:
20
City and State where sworn and signed:
21
Printed Name:
22
Signature:
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
DECLARATION UNDER CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5.1
2
I, Mary Jo Shartsis, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
3
Stipulated Protective Order For Litigation Involving Patents, Highly Sensitive Confidential
4
Information And/Or Trade Secrets. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5.1(i), I hereby attest
5
that I have the concurrence of each of the signatories indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/)
6
within this e-filed document.
7
DATED: November 1, 2012
8
9
/s/ Mary Jo Shartsis
MARY JO SHARTSIS
8301\001\1834408.4
S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD
- 21 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?