GSI Technology, Inc. v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation

Filing 44

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (MODIFIED BY THE COURT). Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on December 4, 2012. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP ARTHUR J. SHARTSIS (Bar #51549) ashartsis@sflaw.com MARY JO SHARTSIS (Bar #55194) mshartsis@sflaw.com ROBERT E. SCHABERG (Bar #81430) rschaberg@sflaw.com One Maritime Plaza, 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 421-6500 Facsimile: (415) 421-2922 Attorneys for Plaintiff GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 14 GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware corporation, 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 18 *E-FILED: December 4, 2012* Case No. 5:11-cv-03613-EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS, HIGHLY SENSITIVE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND/OR TRADE SECRETS (MODIFIED BY THE COURT) Defendant. 19 20 Plaintiff GSI Technology, Inc. and Defendant Cypress Semiconductor Corporation hereby 21 22 stipulate and agree as follows: 23 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 24 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 25 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 26 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 27 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following 28 Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from 2 public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to 3 confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as 4 set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file 5 confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62 set forth the 6 procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks 7 permission from the Court to file material under seal. 8 2. 9 S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 10 11 DEFINITIONS 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 12 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 13 of Civil Procedure 26(c), including without limitation: (1) information protected pursuant to 14 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2; (2) information protected by any federal, California, or other 15 privacy statute, such as the California Right to Financial Privacy Act; and (3) information 16 protected by an existing contractual obligation requiring the Designating Party to maintain the 17 confidentiality of the information. Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude a Party from redacting 18 personal information, including social security numbers or dates of birth, as required by 19 governing law or contract or otherwise pursuant to the applicable policies of the Party.. 20 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel as 21 well as their support staff, including but not limited to attorneys, paralegals, secretaries, law 22 clerks, and investigators. 23 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that 24 it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 25 CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 26 27 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, including from any non-party, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained 28 Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD -2STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 2 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 3 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 4 the litigation, along with his or her employees and support personnel, who (1) has been retained 5 by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action, (2) is not a 6 past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, is 7 not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor. 8 2.7 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another 10 S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 9 Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by 11 less restrictive means. 12 13 2.8 include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 14 15 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party. House Counsel does not 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party. 16 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys, as well as their support staff, including but 17 not limited to paralegals, secretaries, law clerks and investigators) who are not employees of a 18 Party but are retained by a Party to represent or advise that Party and have appeared in this action 19 on behalf of that Party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that 20 Party. 21 22 23 24 25 2.11 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 26 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 27 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 28 subcontractors. Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD -3STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 3 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 4 Producing Party. 5 3. 6 SCOPE 3.1 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected 8 Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any 9 testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected 10 S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 7 Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the 11 following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure 12 to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party 13 as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the 14 public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party 15 prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who 16 obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating 17 Party; and (c) any information obtained outside of litigation with the consent of the Producing 18 Party and not subject to a Non-Disclosure Agreement. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall 19 be governed by a separate agreement or order. 20 21 22 3.2 Nothing in this Order shall prevent or restrict a Producing Party’s own disclosure or use of its own Protected Material for any purpose. 3.3 Nothing in this Order shall be construed to prejudice any Party’s rights to use any 23 Protected Material in Court or in any Court filing with the written consent of the Designating 24 Party or by order of the Court. 25 3.4 This Order is without prejudice to the right of any Party to seek further or 26 additional protection of any Discovery Material or to modify this Order in any way, including, 27 without limitation, an order that certain matter not be produced at all. 28 Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD -4STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 3.5 Nothing in this Order shall be construed to prevent Outside Counsel of Record or 2 House Counsel from advising their clients with respect to this case in whole or in part upon 3 Protected Materials, provided the Protected Materials are not disclosed by such Counsel except as 4 provided in this Order. 5 4. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by 7 this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court 8 order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all 9 claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after 10 S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 6 the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, 11 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to 12 applicable law. 13 5. 14 DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party 15 or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care 16 to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. 17 To the extent it is practical to do so, the Designating Party must designate for protection only 18 those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify—so that 19 other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not 20 warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 21 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are 22 shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to 23 unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary 24 expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 25 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated 26 for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify for the level of protection 27 initially asserted, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is 28 withdrawing the mistaken designation. Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD -5STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order 2 (see, e.g., second paragraph of Section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, 3 Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so 4 designated before the material is disclosed or produced. 5 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 6 (a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing 8 Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ 9 EYES ONLY” to each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the 10 S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 7 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 11 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for 12 each portion, the level of protection being asserted. 13 A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection 14 need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which 15 material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all 16 of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL— 17 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants 18 copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, 19 qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the 20 Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 21 CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) to each page that contains Protected 22 Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 23 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 24 markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being 25 asserted. 26 (b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, 27 the Designating Party may identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or 28 other proceeding, all protected testimony and specify the level of protection being asserted. Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD -6STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection 2 and it appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the 3 Designating Party may invoke on the record (before the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding 4 is concluded) a right to have up to 21 days to identify the specific portions of the testimony as to 5 which protection is sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted. Only those 6 portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the 21 days shall 7 be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. Pending designation as set forth 8 above, 9 CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” information. Alternatively, a Designating 10 S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 1 Party may specify, at the deposition or up to 21 days afterwards if that period is properly invoked, 11 that 12 CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” the the entire entire transcript, transcript including shall be exhibits, treated as shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL” as or “HIGHLY “HIGHLY 13 Parties shall give the other parties notice if they reasonably expect a deposition, hearing or 14 other proceeding to include Protected Material so that the other parties can ensure that only 15 authorized individuals who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” 16 (Exhibit A) are present at those proceedings. The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition 17 shall not in any way affect its designation as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 18 CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 19 Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an obvious legend on the title page 20 that the transcript contains Protected Material, and the title page shall be followed by a list of all 21 pages (including line numbers as appropriate) that have been designated as Protected Material and 22 the level of protection being asserted by the Designating Party. The Designating Party shall 23 inform the court reporter of these requirements. Any transcript that is prepared before the 24 expiration of a 21-day period for designation shall be treated during that period as if it had been 25 designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” in its entirety unless 26 otherwise agreed. After the expiration of that period, the transcript shall be treated only as 27 actually designated. If any portion of a videotaped deposition is designated, the original and all 28 Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD -7STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 copies of any videocassette, videotape, DVD or other media container shall be labeled with the 2 appropriate legend. 3 Any Protected Material that is used in the taking of a deposition shall remain subject to 4 the provisions of this Order, along with the transcript pages and videotape of the deposition 5 testimony dealing with such Protected Material. Counsel for any Producing Party shall have the 6 right to exclude from oral depositions, other than the deponent and deponent’s counsel, any 7 person who is not authorized by this Protective Order to receive or access Protected Material 8 based on the designation of such Protected Material. Such right of exclusion shall be applicable 9 only during periods of examination or testimony regarding such Protected Material. S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 10 (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any 11 other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the 12 container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” 13 or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only a portion or portions 14 of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall 15 identify the protected portion(s) and specify the level of protection being asserted. 16 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If a Producing Party discovers that 17 “CONFIDENTIAL” 18 information or items that it produced were not designated as Protected Material, or that it 19 produced information or items that were designated as Protected Material but had designated 20 them in the incorrect category, the Producing Party may notify all other Parties of the error and 21 identify the affected information or items and their new designation or re-designation. Thereafter, 22 the information or items so designated or re-designated will be treated as Protected Material. 23 After providing such notice, the Producing Party shall provide re-labeled copies of the 24 information or items to the Receiving Party reflecting the change in designation. or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 25 A timely corrected inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items does not, 26 standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such 27 material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable 28 efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. Upon Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD -8STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 receiving the Protected Material with the correct confidentiality designation, the Receiving Party 2 shall return or securely destroy, at the Receiving Party’s option, all Discovery Material 3 reasonably accessible to the Receiving Party that was not designated properly. Unauthorized or 4 inadvertent disclosure does not change the status of Discovery Material or waive the right to hold 5 the disclosed document or information as Protected Material. 6 6. 7 CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality 9 designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic 10 S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 8 burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to 11 challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the 12 original designation is disclosed. 13 6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution 14 process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis 15 for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written 16 notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this 17 specific paragraph of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in 18 good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other 19 forms of communication are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In 20 conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality 21 designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the 22 designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, 23 to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next 24 stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or 25 establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in 26 a timely manner. 27 6.3 28 Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court parties shall comply with the undersigned's Standing Order re Civil intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD -9STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Discovery Disputes 1 Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, if 2 applicable) within 21 days of the initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties 3 6 agreeing that the meet and confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Any Discovery Dispute Joint Report ("DDJR") shall affirm that Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has have been satisfied. complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph ^. Failure by seek judicial intervention the Designating Party to make such a motion including the required declaration within 21 days (or 7 14 days, if applicable) shall automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each 8 10 challenged designation. The parties may stipulate without court order to amend the time period seek relief with within which a motion shall be filed. In addition, the Challenging Party may file a motion respect to challenging a confidentiality designation at any time if there is good cause for doing so, including 11 a challenge to the designation of a deposition transcript or any portions thereof. Any motion 12 brought pursuant to this provision must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that 13 the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed by the preceding 14 paragraph. 4 5 S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 9 15 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating 16 Party. Frivolous challenges and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose 17 unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to 18 19 sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to seek relief file a motion to retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the 20 material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s 21 designation until the Court rules on the challenge. 22 7. 23 ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed 24 or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, 25 defending, or attempting to settle this litigation or related appellate proceeding, and not for any 26 other purpose whatsoever. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of 27 persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has been 28 Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD - 10 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of Section 13 below (FINAL 2 DISPOSITION). 3 4 5 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. 7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise 6 ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may 7 disclose any information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: 8 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as non-attorney employees and contractors of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is 10 S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 9 reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation and who have signed the 11 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 12 (b) current or former officers, directors, and employees (including House 13 Counsel) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and 14 who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 15 (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) retained by the Receiving Party to assist 16 in this action, provided that disclosure is only to the extent reasonably necessary to perform such 17 services and provided that such Expert has signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be 18 Bound” (Exhibit A); 19 (d) the Court and its personnel; 20 (e) court reporters, stenographers, videographers retained to record testimony 21 in this action and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and Professional Vendors to 22 whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 23 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 24 (f) during their testimony or preparation for their testimony, witnesses in the 25 action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment 26 and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or 27 ordered by the Court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that 28 Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD - 11 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be 2 disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order. 3 4 (g) custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; 5 6 (h) (i) S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her staff, who have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); and 9 10 mock jurors who have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 7 8 the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a (j) 7.3 any other person with the prior written consent of the Producing Party. Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 11 Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the 12 Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY 13 CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to: 14 (a) Persons designated in Sections 7.2(d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i) and (j); 15 (b) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, including 16 attorneys who are principals or employees of said Outside Counsel of Record, provided that such 17 Outside Counsel is not involved in competitive decision-making on behalf of a Party or a 18 competitor of a Party, to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this 19 litigation, as well as non-attorney employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is 20 reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation and who have signed the 21 “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 22 (c) Designated House Counsel of the Receiving Party, (1) who have no 23 involvement in competitive decision-making, (2) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for 24 this litigation, (3) who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” 25 (Exhibit A), and (4) as to whom the procedures set forth in Section 7.4(a), below, have been 26 followed; 27 28 (d) Experts (as defined in this Order) retained by the Receiving Party to assist in this action, provided that disclosure is only to the extent reasonably necessary to perform such Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD - 12 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 services, that such Expert is not involved in competitive decision-making on behalf of a Party or a 2 competitor of a Party, that such Expert has signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be 3 Bound” (Exhibit A), and that the procedures set forth in Section 7.4(b) below have been followed; 4 and 5 6 7 (e) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 7.4 Procedures for Approving or Objecting to Disclosure of “HIGHLY 8 CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items to Designated House 9 Counsel or Experts. S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 10 (a) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or agreed to in writing by the 11 Designating Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to Designated House Counsel any information or 12 item that has been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 13 pursuant to Section 7.3(c) first must make a written request to the Designating Party that (1) sets 14 forth the full name of the Designated House Counsel and the city and state of his or her residence, 15 and (2) describes the Designated House Counsel’s current and reasonably foreseeable future 16 primary job duties and responsibilities in sufficient detail to determine if House Counsel is 17 involved, or may become involved, in any competitive decision-making. 18 (b) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or agreed to in writing by the 19 Designating Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an Expert (as defined in this Order) any 20 information or item that has been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ 21 EYES ONLY” pursuant to Section 7.3(d) first must make a written request to the Designating 22 Party that (1) identifies the general categories of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ 23 EYES ONLY” information that the Receiving Party seeks permission to disclose to the Expert 24 without disclosure of the identity of the Expert as long as the Expert is not a current officer, 25 director, or employee of a competitor of a Party or anticipated to become one. 26 (c) A Party that makes a request and provides the information specified in the 27 preceding respective paragraphs may disclose the subject Protected Material to the identified 28 Designated House Counsel or Expert unless, within 14 days of delivering the request, the Party Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD - 13 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 receives a written objection from the Designating Party. Any such objection must set forth in 2 detail the grounds on which it is based. 3 4 5 6 7 (d) A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with the Designating Party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to resolve the matter by parties agreement within seven days of the written objection. If no agreement is reached, the Party shall comply with the undersigned's Standing Order re Civil Discovery Disputes. seeking to make the disclosure to Designated House Counsel or Expert may file a motion as 9 circumstances with specificity, set forth in detail the reasons why the disclosure to the Designated 10 S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 8 provided in Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order DDJR 62, if applicable) seeking permission from the Court to do so. Any such motion must describe the House Counsel or Expert is reasonably necessary, assess the risk of harm that the disclosure 11 would entail, and suggest any additional means that could be used to reduce that risk. In addition, 12 any such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration describing the parties’ efforts 13 to resolve the matter by agreement (i.e., the extent and the content of the meet and confer 14 discussions) and setting forth the reasons advanced by the Designating Party for its refusal to 15 approve the disclosure. 16 In any such proceeding, the Party opposing disclosure to Designated House Counsel or 17 Expert shall bear the burden of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail 18 (under the safeguards proposed) outweighs the Receiving Party’s need to disclose the Protected 19 Material to its Designated House Counsel or Expert. 20 21 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION 22 If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels 23 disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” or 24 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” that Party must: 25 26 27 28 (a) within three business days notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD - 14 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 subject to this Protective Order. 2 Protective Order; and 3 4 (c) Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the 6 subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as 7 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” before a 8 determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained 9 the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of 10 S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 5 seeking protection in that court of its Protected Material, and nothing in these provisions should 11 be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful 12 directive from another court. See Paragraph 14. 13 14 9. 15 A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION (a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non- 16 Party in this action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL— 17 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” Such information produced by Non-Parties in connection with 18 this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these 19 provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections. 20 (b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to 21 produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession or control, and the Party is 22 subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential 23 information, then the Party shall: 24 1. promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party 25 that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non- 26 Party; 27 28 Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD - 15 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2. promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated 2 Protective Order in this litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific 3 description of the information requested; and 4 5 3. make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party. 6 (c) If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this Court within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may 8 produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the 9 Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information 10 S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 7 in its possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party 11 before a determination by the Court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall 12 13 bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in this Court of its Protected Material.See Paragraph 14. 10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 14 If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected 15 Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective 16 Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the 17 unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the 18 Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were 19 made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the 20 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 21 22 11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED MATERIAL 23 The inadvertent production of material subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege, work 24 product protection or other privilege or protection shall not constitute automatic waiver of such 25 privilege or protection pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502. When a Producing Party gives 26 notice to a Receiving Party that certain inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of 27 privilege or other protection, the obligations of the Receiving Party are those set forth in Federal 28 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD This provision is not intended to modify whatever - 16 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 2 privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties 3 reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a communication or information covered by the 4 attorney-client privilege or work product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement 5 in the stipulated protective order submitted to the Court. 6 12. 7 8 9 MISCELLANEOUS 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 10 Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any 11 information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, 12 no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material 13 covered by this Protective Order. 14 12.3 Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party 15 or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in 16 the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any 17 Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62. Protected 18 Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the 19 specific Protected Material at issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, a 20 sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing that the Protected Material at issue is 21 privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a 22 Receiving Party's request to file Protected Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 23 79-5(d) and General Order 62 is denied by the Court, then the Receiving Party may file the 24 Protected Material in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) unless otherwise 25 instructed by the Court. 26 12.4 Termination of the Action and Retention of Jurisdiction. The Parties agree that the 27 terms of this Protective Order shall survive and remain in effect after the Final Disposition of this 28 action as defined in Section 4 (DURATION). The Court shall retain jurisdiction after Final Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD - 17 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Disposition to hear and resolve any disputes arising out of this Protective Order for a period of six 2 months. 3 12.5 Successors. This Order shall be binding upon the Parties hereto, their attorneys, 4 and their successors, executors, personal representatives, administrators, legal representatives, 5 assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, employees, agents, retained consultants and experts, and any 6 persons or organizations over which they have direct control. 7 12.6 Modification by Court. This Order is subject to further court order based upon 8 public policy or other considerations, and the Court may modify this Order sua sponte in the 9 interests of justice. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California is S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 10 responsible for the interpretation and enforcement of this Order. 11 Protected Material, however designated, produced under the protection of this Order shall be 12 resolved by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 13 12.7 All disputes concerning Discovery Rules Remain Unchanged. Identification of any individual pursuant to 14 this Order does not make that individual available for deposition or any other form of discovery 15 outside of the restrictions and procedures of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules 16 for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, or the Court’s own 17 orders. 18 13. FINAL DISPOSITION 19 Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in Section 4 20 (DURATION), each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or 21 destroy such material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, 22 abstracts, compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the 23 Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party 24 must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to 25 the Designating Party) by the 60-day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) 26 all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party 27 has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing 28 or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD - 18 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing 2 transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, 3 attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain 4 Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain 5 subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4.* 6 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. DATED: November 1, 2012 /s/ Mary Jo Shartsis Mary Jo Shartsis Shartsis Friese LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff GSI Technology, Inc. DATED: November 1, 2012 /s/ Lee H. Rubin Lee H. Rubin Mayer Brown LLP Attorneys for Defendant Cypress Semiconductor Corporation 8 9 S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 10 11 12 13 14 AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT, PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,^ IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 4 DATED: December ___, 2012 16 Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge 17 18 19 20 *14. In the event of any discovery or disclosure dispute, the parties and any affected non-parties shall comply with the undersigned's Standing Order re Civil Discovery Disputes. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD - 19 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 EXHIBIT A ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 2 I, 3 __________________________________________________________________ [name and full address and telephone number], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read 5 in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States 6 District Court for the Northern District of California on __________ in the case of GSI 7 Technology, Inc. v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Case No. 5:11-cv-03613-EJD. I agree 8 to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I 9 understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and 10 S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 4 punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner 11 any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity 12 except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. 13 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the 14 Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective 15 Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. 16 I hereby appoint ____________________ [name and full address and telephone number] 17 as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings 18 related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. 19 Date: 20 City and State where sworn and signed: 21 Printed Name: 22 Signature: 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 DECLARATION UNDER CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5.1 2 I, Mary Jo Shartsis, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 Stipulated Protective Order For Litigation Involving Patents, Highly Sensitive Confidential 4 Information And/Or Trade Secrets. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5.1(i), I hereby attest 5 that I have the concurrence of each of the signatories indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) 6 within this e-filed document. 7 DATED: November 1, 2012 8 9 /s/ Mary Jo Shartsis MARY JO SHARTSIS 8301\001\1834408.4 S HARTSIS F RIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: 5:11-cv03613-EJD - 21 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?