GSI Technology, Inc. v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation

Filing 66

ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. On or before April 2, 2014, the parties shall contact the ADR unit to advance the date of the ADR Phone Conference from June 11, 2014, to May 23, 2014, or earlier. Updated Joint Pretrial Confere nce Statement due by 5/27/2104. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 6/6/2014 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila on 3/26/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2014) Modified text on 3/26/2014 (ecg, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 CASE NO. 5:11-cv-03613 EJD GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC., 6 ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Plaintiff(s), 7 8 v. CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, 9 10 Defendant(s). For the Northern District of California United States District Court / 11 12 Having reviewed the parties’ joint statement, the court has determined that a pretrial 13 conference is premature at this time. Accordingly, the Preliminary Pretrial Conference scheduled 14 for March 28, 2014, is CONTINUED to 11:00 a.m. June 6, 2014. The parties shall file an updated 15 Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement on or before May 27, 2014. 16 In addition, the court orders as follows: 17 1. The court notes the parties’ trial estimate is extensive. The updated Joint Preliminary 18 Pretrial Conference Statement must better explain the basis for this estimate, 19 including the number of witnesses each side intends to call at trial. 20 21 22 2. On or before April 2, 2014, the parties shall contact the ADR unit to advance the date of the ADR Phone Conference from June 11, 2014, to May 23, 2014, or earlier. IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: March 26, 2014 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:11-cv-03613 EJD ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?