GSI Technology, Inc. v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation

Filing 73

AMENDED ORDER re 72 Order on Stipulation Regarding Limited Reopening of Discovery and Modification of Dispositive Motion Briefing Schedule. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 71 Order on Stipulation: Discovery due by 6/13/2014. Response due by 7/2 8/2014. Reply due by 8/25/2014. Motion Hearing set for 9/5/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/13/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2014) Modified text on 5/13/2014 (ecg, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP
ARTHUR J. SHARTSIS (Bar #51549)
[e-mail]
MARY JO SHARTSIS (Bar #55194)
[e-mail]
ROBERT E. SCHABERG (Bar #81430)
[e-mail]
LARISA A. MEISENHEIMER (Bar #228777)
[e-mail]
JOHN J. STEIN (Bar #253777)
[e-mail]
One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3598
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC.

ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN JOSE DIVISION

14
15
16
17
18

GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,

19

Case No. 5:11-cv-03613-EJD
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
XXXXXXXX
ORDER REGARDING LIMITED
REOPENING OF DISCOVERY AND
MODIFICATION OF DISPOSITIVE
MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE
(AMENDED)

Defendant.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff GSI Technology, Inc. (“GSI”) and Defendant Cypress Semiconductor
Corporation (“Cypress”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree and
stipulate to the following:
1.

On April 25, 2014, the Court approved the Parties’ Stipulation Regarding Limited

Reopening of Discovery and Modification of Dispositive Motion Briefing Schedule and Order
[ECF 70]. The Court’s April 25, 2014 Order provided for the completion of certain depositions
on or before May 23, 2014. One necessary GSI witness is unavailable until June and that
Case No.
5:11-cv-03613-EJD

-1STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE LIMITED REOPENING OF DISCOVERY
AND MODIFICATION OF DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1

witness’s deposition may impact Cypress’s decision to exercise its right under the Court’s April

2

25, 2014 Order to take one additional deposition of a GSI witness. Accordingly, the Parties

3

hereby request the following revision to the deposition schedule:

4

(a) All depositions shall be complete on or before June 13, 2014.

5

3.

Under the current briefing schedule, dispositive motions must be filed no later

6

than May 30, 2014, oppositions shall be filed by July 7, 2014, and reply memoranda shall be

7

filed by August 4, 2014. The hearing date is set for September 5, 2014 at 9:00 AM. The Parties

8

jointly request that the Court approve and adopt the following modified briefing schedule so that

9

dispositive motions are due after the completion of depositions:

10

ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

11

(a)

Dispositive motions and any motions pursuant to Daubert v. Merrell Dow

Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), shall be filed and served no later than June 20, 2014;

12

(b) Memoranda in Opposition shall be filed and served no later than July 28, 2014;

13

(c) Reply Memoranda shall be filed no later than August 25, 2014; and

14

(d) The hearing date shall remain as set for September 5, 2014 at 9:00 AM.

15

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

16
17

Respectfully submitted,
DATED: May 9, 2014

18

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP
By:

19
20
21

Attorneys for Plaintiff
GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC.

22
23

/s/ Robert E. Schaberg
Arthur J. Shartsis (SBN 51549)
Mary Jo Shartsis (SBN 55194)
Robert E. Schaberg (SBN 81430)
Larisa A. Meisenheimer (SBN 228777)
John J. Stein (SBN 253777)

DATED: May 9, 2014

24

MAYER BROWN LLP
By:

25
26

/s/ Lee H. Rubin
Lee H. Rubin (SBN 141331)
Christopher J. Kelly (SBN 276312)
Attorneys for Defendant
CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION

27
28
Case No.
5:11-cv-03613-EJD

-2STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE LIMITED REOPENING OF DISCOVERY
AND MODIFICATION OF DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1
ATTESTATION: The Filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has

2
3

been obtained from all signatories.
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED.

4
5
6
7

Dated:

May 13

08301\001\4517619.v1

, 2014

The Honorable Edward J. Davila
United States District Court

8
9
10

ONE MARITIME PLAZA
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.
5:11-cv-03613-EJD

-3STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE LIMITED REOPENING OF DISCOVERY
AND MODIFICATION OF DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE