Berman v. Knife River Corporation et al

Filing 26

ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, re 22 Stipulation filed by California Department of Transportation 11/8/2011 Case Management Conference continued to 1/10/2012 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 11/2/2011. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 RONALD W. BEALS, Chief Counsel JEANNE SCHERER, Assistant Chief Counsel LAUREN A. MACHADO, Deputy Attorney JEREMY C. THOMAS, SBN 231973 ERIN HOLBROOK, SBN 210081 (Erin Holbrook@dot.ca.gov) Attorneys for Department of Transportation 1120 N Street (MS 57) P.O. Box 1438 Sacramento, California 95812-1438 Telephone: (916) 654-2630 Facsimile: (916) 654-6128 Attorneys for Defendants State of California, California Department of Transportation 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT, SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 JOHN BERMAN, 12 ~ ) [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE ) CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 KNIFE RIVER CORPORATION; STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; and Does 1-30, 15 16 17 18 Case No.: 5:2011CV03698 PSG ) Defendants. ~ ) ) ) Magistrate Judge PaulS. Grewal ~ ) ----------------------------------) 19 20 Based on the stipulation of the parties and for good cause, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS 21 that the case management conference in this matter set for November 8, 2011 at 2:00p.m. IS 22 CONTINUED to _ J J a _ _ _ _ _ _ _(month), ________(day), _______(year), at _ __.p.m., January 2:00 10 2012 23 before Magistrate Judge PaulS. Grewal in Courtroom 5. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: 11/2/2011 26 27 28 By :__----r-~...-r.";'i";"!i";...........,;F"i"!""'n-I"'"iT'F'"--nr;;:'"'i'"?i~;;=;-n""i"<'i"'i"T""i"""i.-------MAGISTRATE PAUL SINGH GREWAL United States District Court, Northern District San Jose Division !Proposed) Order to Continue Case Management Conference- 5:2011CV03698 PSG 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 I, the undersigned, say: I am, and was at all times herein mentioned, a citizen of the United States and employed in the County of Sacramento, State of California, over the age of 18 years and not a party to the wtthin action or proceeding; that my business address is 1120 N Street, Sacramento, California; that I enclosed a true copy of the attached: [PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE in a separate envelope for each of the persons named below, addressed as set forth immediately below the respective names, as follows: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, in pro per John Berman johnb@drvideo.com D By Mail: I caused such envelope(s) to be deposited in the mail at my business address, rgj By Email: I caused such document(s) to be delivered electronically to the email address addressed to the addressee(s) designated. I am readily familiar with The State of California, Department of Transportation, Legal Division's practice for collection and processing of correspondence and pleadings for mailing. In the ordinary course of business at the Department of Transportation, Legal Division, mail is given the correct amount of postage and is deposited on that same day in a United States Postal Service mailbox in the City of Sacramento, California. designated above. 0 By Overnight Courier Service: I caused such envelope(s) to be delivered via overnight courier service to the addressee(s) designated. D By Facsimile: I caused said document(s) to be transmitted to the telephone number(s) of the addressee( s) designated. A copy of the transmission report showing the transmission was complete and without error is attached hereto. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Sacramento, California, on October n 2011. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 )Proposed) Order to Continue Case Management Conference- 5:2011CV03698 PSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?