Copper Hill, Inc v. Cabral
Filing
11
ORDER REMANDING ACTION. Accordingly, this action is remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(4), as no basis for federal jurisdiction exists upon a review of the Notice of Removal and its attached documents. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/27/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/27/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-03714 EJD
COPPER HILL, INC.,
11
ORDER REMANDING ACTION
Plaintiff(s),
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
v.
DEBORAH J. CABRAL,
14
Defendant(s).
15
/
16
On September 14, 2011, the court issued an Order requiring the filing, by September 26,
17
2011, of a either a voluntary dismissal of this action by Plaintiff or a stipulation for dismissal. The
18
court indicated it would summarily remand this matter to the Superior Court for failure to comply
19
with the Order.
20
To date, the parties have not complied as directed. Accordingly, this action is remanded to
21
the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446(c)(4), as no
22
basis for federal jurisdiction exists upon a review of the Notice of Removal and its attached
23
documents. See Vaden v. Discovery Bank, 129 S. Ct. 1262, 1272 (2009). The Clerk shall close this
24
file.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: September 27, 2011
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-03714 EJD
ORDER REMANDING ACTION (EJDLC1)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?