Copper Hill, Inc v. Cabral

Filing 11

ORDER REMANDING ACTION. Accordingly, this action is remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(4), as no basis for federal jurisdiction exists upon a review of the Notice of Removal and its attached documents. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/27/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/27/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:11-cv-03714 EJD COPPER HILL, INC., 11 ORDER REMANDING ACTION Plaintiff(s), For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 v. DEBORAH J. CABRAL, 14 Defendant(s). 15 / 16 On September 14, 2011, the court issued an Order requiring the filing, by September 26, 17 2011, of a either a voluntary dismissal of this action by Plaintiff or a stipulation for dismissal. The 18 court indicated it would summarily remand this matter to the Superior Court for failure to comply 19 with the Order. 20 To date, the parties have not complied as directed. Accordingly, this action is remanded to 21 the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446(c)(4), as no 22 basis for federal jurisdiction exists upon a review of the Notice of Removal and its attached 23 documents. See Vaden v. Discovery Bank, 129 S. Ct. 1262, 1272 (2009). The Clerk shall close this 24 file. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: September 27, 2011 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:11-cv-03714 EJD ORDER REMANDING ACTION (EJDLC1)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?