Binkovich et al v. Barthelmy et al

Filing 105

ORDER GRANTING MOTION RE TAXATION OF COSTS by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal granting 97 . Costs taxed in the amount of $ 5,176.97 against Bruce Barthelmy.(psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 ALEKSANDR BINKOVICH 12 Plaintiff, v. 13 14 OFFICER BARTHELMY, et al., ORDER GRANTING MOTION RE TAXATION OF COSTS (Re: Docket No. 97) Defendants. 15 16 17 Case No. 5:11-cv-03774-PSG Before the court is a motion from Plaintiff Aleksandr Binkovich to vacate the Clerk’s taxation of costs. While his counsel raised objections at the hearing yesterday, Defendant Bruce 18 Barthelmy filed no opposition. After considering the parties’ arguments, the court GRANTS 19 20 Binkovich’s motion. The crux of the dispute is that Binkovich’s counsel was a few days late in filing his 21 22 declaration supporting the costs he seeks in this case and asks the court to consider his tardy 23 declaration. The case law in this area permits the court to consider a declaration that is a few days 24 late. 1 Because Binkovich’s late declaration has not prejudiced Defendants and otherwise 25 establishes Binkovich is entitled to the costs he seeks, the court GRANTS Binkovich’s motion. 26 27 Costs shall be taxed against Barthelmy in the amount of $5,176.97. 1 28 See Walker v. California, 200 F.3d 624, 626 (9th Cir. 1999); Rodriguez v. Barrita, Inc., Case No. 5:09-cv-04057-RS, 2014 WL 2967925, at *13 (N.D. Cal. July 1, 2014). 1 Case No. 5:11-cv-03774-PSG ORDER GRANTING MOTION RE TAXATION OF COSTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?