Binkovich et al v. Barthelmy et al

Filing 62

SECOND PROPOSED VERDICT FORM. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 21, 2014. (psglc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

8

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

ALEKSANDR BINKOVICH,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.
OFFICER BARTHELMY, et al.,
Defendants.

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 5:11-cv-03774-PSG
[SECOND PROPOSED]
VERDICT FORM

16
17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19

Date: April 21, 2014

____________________________
Paul S. Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 5:11-cv-03774-PSG
[SECOND PROPOSED] VERDICT FORM

1
2

SECTION 1: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VIOLATION OF FOURTH AMENDMENT – UNREASONABLE SEIZURE WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE
We, the jury, unanimously answer the Questions submitted to us as follows:

3
1-A. Did any individual defendant intentionally seize Aleksandr Binkovich?
4
i. Bruce Barthelemy:

Yes _____ No _____

6

ii. Louis Grondahl:

Yes _____ No _____

7

iii. Terry Craig:

Yes _____ No _____

5

8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

If your answer to Question 1-A as to any defendant is “Yes,” then answer Question 1-B for that
defendant but for no others.
If you answered “No” to all defendants, go to Section 2.
1-B. Did the defendant have a reasonable suspicion that Binkovich was engaged in
cccccccccccriminal conduct?

11
i. Bruce Barthelemy:

Yes _____ No _____

ii. Louis Grondahl:

Yes _____ No _____

iii. Terry Craig:

Yes _____ No _____

12
13
14
15
16

If your answer to Question 1-B as to any defendant is “Yes,” then answer Question 1-C.
If you answered “No” to all defendants, go to Section 2.
1-C. Was either the length or the scope of the seizure unreasonable?

17
Yes _____ No _____
18
19

GO TO SECTION 2.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 5:11-cv-03774-PSG
[SECOND PROPOSED] VERDICT FORM

1
2

SECTION 2: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VIOLATION OF FOURTH AMENDMENT – EXCESSIVE FORCE BY INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
We, the jury, unanimously answer the Questions submitted to us as follows:

3
2-A. Did any defendant use excessive force against Binkovich?
4
i. Bruce Barthelemy:

Yes _____ No _____

6

ii. Louis Grondahl:

Yes _____ No _____

7

iii. Terry Craig:

Yes _____ No _____

5

8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

If your answer to Question 2-A as to any defendant is “Yes,” then answer Question 2-B for that
defendant but for no others.
If you answered “No” to all defendants, go to Section 3.
2-B. Was Binkovich harmed by any defendant’s excessive force?
i. Bruce Barthelemy:

Yes _____ No _____

ii. Louis Grondahl:

Yes _____ No _____

iii. Terry Craig:

Yes _____ No _____

If your answer to Question 2-B as to any defendant is “Yes,” then answer Question 2-C.
If you answered “No” to all defendants, go to Section 3.
2-C. Was any defendant’s conduct a substantial factor in causing harm to Binkovich?
i. Bruce Barthelemy:

Yes _____ No _____

ii. Louis Grondahl:

Yes _____ No _____

iii. Terry Craig:

Yes _____ No _____

20
GO TO SECTION 3.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 5:11-cv-03774-PSG
[SECOND PROPOSED] VERDICT FORM

SECTION 3: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUBLIC ENTITY LIABILITY – POLICY, PRACTICE, OR CUSTOM

1
2

We, the jury, unanimously answer the Questions submitted to us as follows:

3
3-A. We, the jury, have answered Yes” to one or more subparts of the following questions:
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15

i.

_______ Question 1-C (§ 1983 – Unreasonable Seizure)

ii.

_______ Question 2-C (§ 1983 – Excessive Force)

If you checked any question under Question 3-A, then answer Question 3-B.
If not, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the foreperson sign and date this
form.
3-B. In seizing and/or using excessive force against Binkovich, was any defendant acting
cccccccccipursuant to an expressly adopted official policy or longstanding practice or custom of
cccccccccithe City of San Jose?
Yes _____ No _____
If your answer to Question 3-B is “Yes,” then answer Question 3-C.
If your answer to Question 3-B is “No,” go to Section 4.
3-C. Was the City of San Jose’s policy or custom the moving force behind a deprivation of
Binkovich’ Fourth Amendment rights?
Yes _____ No _____

16
GO TO SECTION 4.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Case No. 5:11-cv-03774-PSG
[SECOND PROPOSED] VERDICT FORM

SECTION 4: DAMAGES

1
2
3

We, the jury, unanimously answer the Questions submitted to us as follows:
4-A. What is the total amount of damages, if any, suffered by Binkovich? Do not award
duplicate damages for the same harm suffered from multiple claims.

4
$ __________________
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

4-B. Did Binkovich use reasonable efforts to mitigate his damages?
Yes _____ No _____
If your answer to Question 4-B is “No,” then answer Question 4-C.
If your answer to Question 4-B is “Yes,” go to Question 4-D.
4-C. How much of Binkovich’ damages could have been mitigated by Binkovich’ reasonable
efforts?
$ __________________
4-D. We, the jury, have answered “Yes” to one or more of the following questions with
respect to the following defendants:
i. Question 1-C (§ 1983 – Unreasonable Seizure)
_____ Bruce Barthelemy
_____ Louis Grondahl
_____ Terry Craig

18

ii. Question 2-C (§ 1983 – Excessive Force)

19

_____ Bruce Barthelemy

20

_____ Louis Grondahl

21

_____ Terry Craig

22
23
24
25

If you checked any question for any defendant under Question 4-D, go to Question 4-E and answer
as to each of the officers whom you checked.
If not, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the foreperson sign and date this
form.
4-E. Did the officer(s) engage in malice, oppression, or in reckless disregard of Binkovich’
rights with respect to any of the claims that you checked in Question 4-D?

26

i. Bruce Barthelemy:

Yes _____ No _____

27

ii. Louis Grondahl:

Yes _____ No _____

28

iii. Terry Craig:

Yes _____ No _____
5

Case No. 5:11-cv-03774-PSG
[SECOND PROPOSED] VERDICT FORM

1
2
3
4

If you checked “Yes” for any defendant under Question 4-E, then answer Question 4-F as to that
defendant only.
If not, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the foreperson sign and date this
form.
4-F. What amount, if any, do you award in punitive damages?
Bruce Barthelemy:

$ __________________

Louis Grondahl:

$ __________________

Terry Craig:

$ __________________

5
6
7
8
9

Have the foreperson sign and date this form.

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

Signed: _________________________________ Dated: _________________

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Case No. 5:11-cv-03774-PSG
[SECOND PROPOSED] VERDICT FORM