Guzik Technical Enterprises, Inc. v. Western Digital Corporation et al

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 12 Stipulation, filed by Western Digital (Fremont) Inc, Western Digital (Malaysia) SDN.BHD., Western Digital Technologies, Inc., Western Digital (Thailand) Company Limited, Guzik Technical Enterprises, Inc., Western Digital Corporation. Response to Complaint due by 9/26/2011. Case Management Statement due by 11/8/2011. Case Management Conference set for 11/15/2011 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on August 12, 2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 BARCELO, HARRISON & WALKER, LLP Reynaldo C. Barceló (SBN 199741) rey@bhiplaw.com 2901 West Coast Highway, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Telephone: (949) 340-9736 Facsimile: (949) 258-5752 Attorneys for Defendants 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, INC., 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, v. WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION, WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., WESTERN DIGITAL (FREMONT) INC., WESTERN DIGITAL (THAILAND) COMPANY LIMITED, WESTERN DIGITAL (MALAYSIA) SDN.BHD, 19 No. 5:11-cv-03786-PSG STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE RELATED DATES Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 5:11-cv-03786-PSG 1 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2, 7-12, and related rules, Plaintiff Guzik Technical 2 Enterprises, Inc. (“GTE”) and Defendants Western Digital Corporation, Western Digital 3 Technologies, Inc., Western Digital (Fremont) Inc., Western Digital (Thailand) Company 4 Limited, and Western Digital (Malaysia) SDN.BHD (collectively, “Western Digital 5 Defendants”), hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 WHEREAS, on August 1, 2011, GTE filed its Complaint against the Western Digital Defendants; WHEREAS, GTE asserts that it served its Complaint upon Defendant Western Digital Corporation on August 3, 2011; WHEREAS, GTE asserts that it served its Complaint upon Defendant Western Digital (Thailand) Company Limited on August 3, 2011; WHEREAS, GTE asserts that it served its Complaint upon Defendant Western Digital Technologies, Inc. on August 3, 2011; WHEREAS, GTE asserts that it served its Complaint upon Defendant Western Digital (Malaysia) SDN.BHD on August 3, 2011; WHEREAS, GTE asserts that it served its Complaint upon Defendant Western Digital (Fremont) Inc. on August 5, 2011; 18 WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the answer or other response to the Complaint for 19 the earliest-served Western Digital Defendants was initially due on or before August 24, 2011; 20 WHEREAS, on August 1, 2011, the Court issued an Order Setting Initial Case 21 Management Conference and ADR Deadlines (Dkt. No. 8) which, among other provisions, set an 22 Initial Case Management Conference in the above-specified action on October 18, 2011, and 23 specified related deadlines leading up to that conference; 24 WHEREAS, GTE and Western Digital, through their respective counsel of record, have 25 agreed to extend the time by which Western Digital must answer or otherwise respond to the 26 Complaint, and to seek a corresponding continuance of the dates that have already been set by 27 the Court; 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 5:11-cv-03786-PSG -2- 1 WHEREAS, Western Digital’s undersigned counsel hereby declares that the extensions 2 requested herein are necessary to provide the Western Digital Defendants sufficient time to 3 analyze the allegations set forth in the Complaint, retain counsel and formulate their responses to 4 the Complaint; and 5 WHEREAS, the parties’ undersigned counsel hereby declare and disclose that no 6 previous time modifications have been sought or obtained in the above-entitled action, and that 7 the time modifications requested herein would have no material impact on the case schedule 8 because the case is at its initial stage: 9 10 11 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record that: (1) 12 13 The Western Digital Defendants shall have until September 26, 2011 to file a response to the Complaint; (2) The Initial Case Management Conference will be continued from October 18, 14 2011 to November 15, 2011, in Courtroom 5, 4th Floor, San Jose Courthouse, at 15 2:00 p.m., and all other dates will be continued accordingly. 16 17 Dated: August 11, 2011 18 Respectfully submitted, BARCELO, HARRISON & WALKER, LLP 19 By: 20 /s/ Reynaldo C. Barceló 21 Reynaldo C. Barceló 22 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION, WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., WESTERN DIGITAL (FREMONT) INC., WESTERN DIGITAL (THAILAND) COMPANY LIMITED, AND WESTERN DIGITAL (MALAYSIA) SDN.BHD 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 5:11-cv-03786-PSG -3- 1 Dated: August 11, 2011 2 Respectfully submitted, BERGESON, LLP 3 By: 4 /s/ Jaideep Venkatesan 5 Jaideep Venkatesan 6 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, INC. 7 8 9 I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B that concurrence in the electronic filing of 10 this document has been obtained from the other signatories. 11 Dated: August 11, 2011 /s/ Reynaldo C. Barceló 12 Reynaldo C. Barceló 13 14 15 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 16 17 18 Dated: August 12, 2011 19 __________________________________________ HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 5:11-cv-03786-PSG -4- 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have 3 consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's 4 ECF System. 5 /s/ Reynaldo C. Barceló Dated: August 11, 2011 6 Reynaldo C. Barceló 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 5:11-cv-03786-PSG -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?