Guzik Technical Enterprises, Inc. v. Western Digital Corporation et al

Filing 150

STIPULATION AND ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON WESTERN DIGITAL'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM DLA PIPER LLP, granting 148 : 4/2/2013 Motion Hearing advanced to 3/26/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 3/1/2013. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

STEVEN M. BAUER, Bar No. 135067
[e-mail]
JAMES L. DAY, Bar No. 197158
[e-mail]
GAVIN M. MASUDA, Bar No. 260480
[e-mail]
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

11

RICHARD G. FRENKEL, Bar No. 204133
[e-mail]
MICHELLE P. WOODHOUSE, Bar No. 260669
[e-mail]
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs

8
9
10

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN JOSE DIVISION
16
17

GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, INC.

18
19
20
21

CASE NO. 5:11-CV-03786-PSG

Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant,
v.
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION,
WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
and WESTERN DIGITAL (FREMONT) INC.,

22

Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs, and

23

WESTERN DIGITAL (THAILAND) COMPANY
LIMITED and WESTERN DIGITAL
(MALAYSIA) SDN.BHD,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR
BRIEFING AND HEARING ON
WESTERN DIGITAL’S MOTION TO
COMPEL PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS FROM DLA PIPER LLP
(US)

24
25

Magistrate Judge: Hon. Paul Singh Grewal
Courtroom: 5, 4th Floor

Defendants.

26
27
28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME
TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL
5:11-CV-03786-PSG

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, 7-12, and related rules, Defendants Western

2

Digital Corporation et al. (collectively, “Western Digital”), and non-party DLA Piper LLP (US)

3

(“DLA Piper”) respectfully request that the Court enter the following stipulation regarding the

4

briefing schedule for Western Digital’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents from DLA

5

Piper LLP (US) (Dkt. No. 147) (“Motion to Compel”).

6
7
8
9
10
11

WHEREAS on January 28, 2013, Western Digital served a Subpoena to Produce
Documents on DLA Piper LLP (US) (“the Subpoena”) ;
WHEREAS on February 8, 2013, DLA Piper served timely responses and objections to
the Subpoena;
WHEREAS on February 22, 2013, Western Digital filed the Motion to Compel with this

12

Court via ECF and served the Motion to Compel upon DLA Piper via email and overnight

13

delivery;

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

WHEREAS pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(a) DLA Piper LLP’s opposition to the Motion to
Compel is due on Monday, March 11;
WHEREAS pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(c) Western Digital’s reply in support of the
Motion to Compel is due on Monday, March 21;
WHEREAS the hearing on the Motion to Compel is presently scheduled for Tuesday,
April 2 at 10:00 am;
WHEREAS the fact discovery cutoff applicable to the underlying matter is May 1, 2013
(Dkt. No. 143);
WHEREAS Western Digital and DLA have met and conferred and agree to shorten the
time for the above briefing schedule and hearing;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the parties hereto, through their respective

25

attorneys of record, that:

26

•

27

DLA Piper will file and serve its opposition to the Motion to Compel on Friday,
March 8;

28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME
TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL
5:11-CV-03786-PSG

•

1
2

Western Digital will file and serve its reply in support of the Motion to Compel
on Friday, March 15;

•

3

The hearing on the Motion to Compel will take place on Tuesday, March 26, at

4

10:00 am.

5

Prior Time Modifications

6

There are no prior time modifications with respect to the Subpoena or the Motion to

7

Compel.

8

Effect of Requested Modification

9

These extensions currently under discussion will have no effect on deadlines in the

10
11
12

underlying matter.
So Stipulated.
Dated: February 28, 2013

LATHAM & WATKINS, LLP

13
By: /s/ Gavin M. Masuda
Gavin M. Masuda
Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs
Western Digital Corporation et al.

14
15
16

Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the above signatory attests that concurrence in the filing of this

17

document has been obtained from the signatory below.

18

Dated: February 28, 2013

DLA Piper LLP (US)

19
By: /s/ Diana Maltzer
_______
Diana Maltzer
Attorneys for Non-Party DLA Piper LLP (US)

20
21
22

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25

March 1
Dated: ___________, 2013
HON. PAUL SINGH GREWAL
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME
TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL
5:11-CV-03786-PSG

xxxxx