Guzik Technical Enterprises, Inc. v. Western Digital Corporation et al
Filing
225
ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS SUBJECT TO WESTERN DIGITAL'S UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF WESTERN DIGITAL'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (D.I. 190), re 199 . Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 7/22/2013. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
JAMES GILLILAND, Bar No. 107988
jgilliland@kilpatricktownsend.com
ROBERT TADLOCK, Bar No. 238479
rtadlock@kilpatricktownsend.com
MEGAN CHUNG, Bar No. 232044
mchung@kilpatricktownsend.com
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 576-0200
Facsimile: (415) 576-0300
ANNE M. ROGASKI, Bar No. 184754
arogaski@kilpatricktownsend.com
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
1080 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 326-2400
Facsimile: (650) 326-2422
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN JOSE DIVISION
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
DANIEL J. BERGESON, Bar No. 105439
dbergeson@be-law.com
MELINDA M. MORTON, Bar No. 209373
mmorton@be-law.com
JAIDEEP VENKATESAN, Bar No. 211386
jvenkatesan@be-law.com
BERGESON, LLP
303 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 500
San Jose, CA 95110-2712
Telephone: (408) 291-6200
Facsimile: (408) 297-6000
GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, a
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION,
v.
Plaintiff,
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation, WESTERN DIGITAL
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware
corporation, WESTERN DIGITAL
(FREMONT), INC., a Delaware corporation,
WESTERN DIGITAL (THAILAND)
COMPANY LIMITED, a Thailand
corporation, and WESTERN DIGITAL
(MALAYSIA) SDN.BHD., a Malaysia
corporation, inclusive,
Defendants.
Civil Action No. CV11-03786 PSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING
DOCUMENTS SUBJECT TO WESTERN
DIGITAL’S UNOPPOSED
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN
SUPPORT OF WESTERN DIGITAL’S
MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION
OF DOCUMENTS (D.I. 190)
Date:
Judge:
Ctrm:
June 4, 2013, 10:00 a.m.
Hon. Paul Singh Grewal
5, 4th Floor
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
August 1, 2011
December 2, 2013
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS SUBJECT TO WESTERN DIGITAL’S
UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL (D.I. 190)
CASE NO. CV11-03786 PSG
-1-
Upon consideration of Western Digital’s Unopposed Administrative Motion for Leave to
1
2
File Under Seal Documents Submitted in Support of Western Digital’s Motion to Compel
3
Production of Documents (D.I. 190) (“Administrative Motion”), the documents subject to Western
4
Digital’s Administrative Motion, and the Declaration of Anne M. Rogaski in support of Western
5
Digital’s Administrative Motion, the Court finds there to be good cause for granting in part
6
Western Digital’s request to file the following documents under seal:
7
1.
8
9
10
Woodhouse in Support of Western Digital’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents (D.I.
191-1) (“Woodhouse Declaration”).
2.
11
12
Portions of Exhibits 10, 14, 18, and 20 to the Declaration of Michelle P.
The entirety of Exhibits 7, 15, 17, 21, 22, 23, 27, and 28 to the Woodhouse
Declaration.
13
In making the finding that good causes exists for sealing the records above, the Court
14
15
makes the following additional findings in support thereof:
1.
16
GTE possesses an overriding confidentiality interest that overcomes the right of
17
public access to portions of Exhibits 10, 14, 18, and 20 to the Woodhouse Declaration, and the
18
entirety of Exhibits 7, 15, 17, 21, 22, 23, 27, and 28 of the Woodhouse Declaration;
2.
19
20
GTE does not allege a confidentiality interest in the remaining documents subject
to Western Digital’s Administrative Motion;
21
3.
GTE’s overriding confidentiality interest support sealing the record;
22
4.
A substantial probability exists that GTE’s overriding confidentiality interest will
23
be prejudiced if the records are not sealed;
24
5.
The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and
25
6.
No less-restrictive means exist to achieve this overriding interest.
26
///
27
///
28
///
[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS SUBJECT TO WESTERN DIGITAL’S
UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL (D.I. 190)
CASE NO. CV11-03786 PSG
-2-
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Western Digital’s Unopposed Administrative Motion
2
for Leave to File Under Seal Documents Submitted in Support of Western Digital’s Motion to
3
Compel Production of Documents (D.I. 190) is GRANTED-IN-PART. Portions of Exhibits 10,
4
14, 18, and 20 and the entirety of Exhibits 7, 15, 17, 21, 22, 23, 27, and 28 to the Declaration of
5
Michelle P. Woodhouse in Support of Western Digital’s Motion to Compel Production of
6
Documents shall be filed under seal.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
DATED: July 22, 2013
12
____________________________
HON PAUL SINGH GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
65432153V.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS SUBJECT TO WESTERN DIGITAL’S
UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL (D.I. 190)
CASE NO. CV11-03786 PSG
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?