Osorio et al v. Silvera et al
Filing
87
ORDER Dismissing Case with Prejudice, Re: 86 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by Gerardo Damian, Enrique Reinoso, Gildardo Osorio, Guillermo Rios, Marin Cortez, Elionai Gonzales, Ruberto Infante Solis. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on May 28, 2013. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2013)
Case5:11-cv-03890-LHK Document86 Filed05/21/13 Page1 of 4
JAMES DAL BON, Bar No. 157942
LAW OFFICES OF JAMES DAL BON
95 S. MARKET ST. 3RD FLOOR
SAN JOSE. CA 95113
TEL (408) 977-7710
FAX (888) 868-8043
jdbfSKvagedefenders.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
DANIEL HERNS, Bar No. 111592
LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL G. HERNS
5704 LA SEYNE PLACE. SUITE 100
SAN JOSE, CA 95138
TEL (408) 223-2220
FAX (408) 223-2682
10
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT MARIA
SILVEIRA, GABRIEL SILVEIRA, AND
S & S DRYWALL, INC.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN JOSE DIVISION
15
16
17
18
19
GILDARDO OSORJO, RUBERTO
INFANTE SOLIS, ELIONAI
GONZALES, MARIN CORTEZ,
ENRIQUE REINOSO, GUILLERMO
RIOS, and GERARDO DAMIAN,
22
23
24
25
Case No. CV11-03890
)
)
^
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT, AND
STIPULATION AND ORDER
DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION
I
WITH PREJUDICE
Plaintiff,
20
21
)
\: Honorable Lucy H. Koh
Vs.
MARIA SILVERA dba S&S
DRYWALL, GABRIEL SILVERA dba
S&S DRYWALL; S&S DRYWALL,
INC.,
Defendant(s).
„ 1
Case5:11-cv-03890-LHK Document86 Filed05/21/13 Page2 of 4
1
The parties herein, by and through their respective counsel of record, James Dal Bon,
2
Esq., DUNK DAL BON & MARGAIN, for Plaintiffs GILDARDO OSORJO, RUPERTO
3
INFANTE SOLIS, ELIONAI GONZALEZ, MARIN CORTEZ, ENRIQUE REINOSO,
4
GUILLERMO RIOS, GERARDO DAMIAN, ALFONSO GARCIA RICO, GUADALUPE
5
PONCE, JORGE GARCIA, FELIX JIMENEZ, JUAN HERNANDEZ, EFRAIN RODRIGUEZ,
6
CRISTOBAL ACOSTA, JOSE MEDEIROS, (hereinafter collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Daniel
7
G. Hems, Esq., LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL G. HERNS, for Defendants MARIA SILVEIRA,
GABRIEL SILVEIRA, S & S DRYWALL, INC., S & S DRYWALL LIMITED, ESPRESSO
9
CONSTRUCTION CLEAN-UP SERVICE, (hereinafter collectively "Defendants") and, with the
10
authority of their respective clients, stipulate as follows:
11
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
1.
12
On November 14, 2012 the parties attended a Settlement Conference wherein the
13
parties agreed that the above captioned action, including all claims, counterclaims, and
14
affirmative defenses be dismissed without prejudice pending full payment of the agreed upon
15
settlement.
16
THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT:
WHEREAS, the parties have fully executed and received the fall settlement amount as
17
set forth in the Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims:
19
WHEREAS, no class was ever certified in this matter; therefore Rule 23 does not apply;
20
WHEREAS, all that remains to be done in this case is the entry of an Order dismissing
21
22
23
with prejudice the entire action;
i
J
THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT:
1.
The Court should enter an Order dismissing with prejudice the entire action as to
all parties.
24
25
- 2
Case5:11-cv-03890-LHK Document86 Filed05/21/13 Page3 of 4
Dated: May 21, 2013
LAW OFFICES OF JAMES
/s/jdb
By
JAMES DAL BON
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS
10
11
LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL G. HERNS
Dated: May 21, 2013
12
By
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
- 3
/s/ dsh
DANIEL G. HERNS
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS
Case5:11-cv-03890-LHK Document86 Filed05/21/13 Page4 of 4
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
SAN JOSE DIVISION
8
11
GILDARDO OSORIO, RUBERTO
INFANTE SOLIS, ELIONAI
GONZALES, MARIN CORTE2;
ENRIQUE REINOSO, GUILLERMO
RIOS, and GERARDO DAMIAN,
12
CASE NO. CV11-03890
Plaintiff,
9
10
13
ORDER
Vs.
14
15
16
17
MARIA SILVERA dba S&S
DRYWALL, GABRIEL SILVERA dba
S&S DRYWALL: S&S DRYWALL,
INC.,
Defendant(s).
18
ORDER
1.
The Court hereby issues an order dismissing with prejudice the entire action as to
all parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: __ 2013 ___
May 28,
__.
HONARABLE LUCY H. KOH
- 4
___
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?