Osorio et al v. Silvera et al

Filing 87

ORDER Dismissing Case with Prejudice, Re: 86 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by Gerardo Damian, Enrique Reinoso, Gildardo Osorio, Guillermo Rios, Marin Cortez, Elionai Gonzales, Ruberto Infante Solis. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on May 28, 2013. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2013)

Download PDF
Case5:11-cv-03890-LHK Document86 Filed05/21/13 Page1 of 4 JAMES DAL BON, Bar No. 157942 LAW OFFICES OF JAMES DAL BON 95 S. MARKET ST. 3RD FLOOR SAN JOSE. CA 95113 TEL (408) 977-7710 FAX (888) 868-8043 jdbfSKvagedefenders.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS DANIEL HERNS, Bar No. 111592 LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL G. HERNS 5704 LA SEYNE PLACE. SUITE 100 SAN JOSE, CA 95138 TEL (408) 223-2220 FAX (408) 223-2682 10 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT MARIA SILVEIRA, GABRIEL SILVEIRA, AND S & S DRYWALL, INC. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN JOSE DIVISION 15 16 17 18 19 GILDARDO OSORJO, RUBERTO INFANTE SOLIS, ELIONAI GONZALES, MARIN CORTEZ, ENRIQUE REINOSO, GUILLERMO RIOS, and GERARDO DAMIAN, 22 23 24 25 Case No. CV11-03890 ) ) ^ NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT, AND STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION I WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff, 20 21 ) \: Honorable Lucy H. Koh Vs. MARIA SILVERA dba S&S DRYWALL, GABRIEL SILVERA dba S&S DRYWALL; S&S DRYWALL, INC., Defendant(s). „ 1 Case5:11-cv-03890-LHK Document86 Filed05/21/13 Page2 of 4 1 The parties herein, by and through their respective counsel of record, James Dal Bon, 2 Esq., DUNK DAL BON & MARGAIN, for Plaintiffs GILDARDO OSORJO, RUPERTO 3 INFANTE SOLIS, ELIONAI GONZALEZ, MARIN CORTEZ, ENRIQUE REINOSO, 4 GUILLERMO RIOS, GERARDO DAMIAN, ALFONSO GARCIA RICO, GUADALUPE 5 PONCE, JORGE GARCIA, FELIX JIMENEZ, JUAN HERNANDEZ, EFRAIN RODRIGUEZ, 6 CRISTOBAL ACOSTA, JOSE MEDEIROS, (hereinafter collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Daniel 7 G. Hems, Esq., LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL G. HERNS, for Defendants MARIA SILVEIRA, GABRIEL SILVEIRA, S & S DRYWALL, INC., S & S DRYWALL LIMITED, ESPRESSO 9 CONSTRUCTION CLEAN-UP SERVICE, (hereinafter collectively "Defendants") and, with the 10 authority of their respective clients, stipulate as follows: 11 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 1. 12 On November 14, 2012 the parties attended a Settlement Conference wherein the 13 parties agreed that the above captioned action, including all claims, counterclaims, and 14 affirmative defenses be dismissed without prejudice pending full payment of the agreed upon 15 settlement. 16 THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT: WHEREAS, the parties have fully executed and received the fall settlement amount as 17 set forth in the Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims: 19 WHEREAS, no class was ever certified in this matter; therefore Rule 23 does not apply; 20 WHEREAS, all that remains to be done in this case is the entry of an Order dismissing 21 22 23 with prejudice the entire action; i J THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT: 1. The Court should enter an Order dismissing with prejudice the entire action as to all parties. 24 25 - 2 Case5:11-cv-03890-LHK Document86 Filed05/21/13 Page3 of 4 Dated: May 21, 2013 LAW OFFICES OF JAMES /s/jdb By JAMES DAL BON ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS 10 11 LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL G. HERNS Dated: May 21, 2013 12 By 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 - 3 /s/ dsh DANIEL G. HERNS ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS Case5:11-cv-03890-LHK Document86 Filed05/21/13 Page4 of 4 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 11 GILDARDO OSORIO, RUBERTO INFANTE SOLIS, ELIONAI GONZALES, MARIN CORTE2; ENRIQUE REINOSO, GUILLERMO RIOS, and GERARDO DAMIAN, 12 CASE NO. CV11-03890 Plaintiff, 9 10 13 ORDER Vs. 14 15 16 17 MARIA SILVERA dba S&S DRYWALL, GABRIEL SILVERA dba S&S DRYWALL: S&S DRYWALL, INC., Defendant(s). 18 ORDER 1. The Court hereby issues an order dismissing with prejudice the entire action as to all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: __ 2013 ___ May 28, __. HONARABLE LUCY H. KOH - 4 ___

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?