Singh et al v. Kogent Corporation et al
Filing
40
ORDER RE: BANKRUPTCY STAY. This action is STAYED insofar as it pertains to Kogent. The action against Defendants Sudhir Saxena and SMB Business Intelligence Builders, Inc. remains pending and shall proceed. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/6/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-03934 EJD
INDER SINGH, et. al.,
11
ORDER RE: BANKRUPTCY STAY
Plaintiff(s),
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
v.
KOGENT CORPORATION, et. al.,
14
Defendant(s).
15
16
/
On November 18, 2011, Defendant Kogent Corporation (“Kogent”) filed a Notice of
17
Bankruptcy Case Filing and Automatic Stay stating that Kogent had filed a bankruptcy petition in
18
the Northern District of California. See Docket Item No. 37. Plaintiffs filed a response to the
19
bankruptcy notice on November 23, 2011, noting that the automatic stay imposed by 11 U.S.C. §
20
362 should apply only to Kogent and not the other defendants named in this action. See Docket
21
Item No. 38.
22
Accordingly, this action is STAYED insofar as it pertains to Kogent. The action against
23
Defendants Sudhir Saxena and SMB Business Intelligence Builders, Inc. remains pending and shall
24
proceed.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: December 6, 2011
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-03934 EJD
ORDER RE: BANKRUPTCY STAY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?