Marcos v. Equity One Lenders Group et al
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 29 Continuing Case Management Conference. Initial case management conference continued to 1/10/2012, 1:30 PM. All related deadlines adjusted accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/19/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2011)
Roger D. Wintle (SBN 142484)
THE H E R I T A G E LAW GROUP, A P.C.
*E-FILED 10-19-2011*
152 North Third Street
San Jose, California 95112
Tel: (408) 993-2100
Fax: (408) 993-2101
Email: rdw^hlgusa.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff:
Jaime Marcos
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
o2
10
11
JAIME MARCOS
Plaintiff
12
0
y
W
13
14
15
•a
o
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:1 l-CV-04000 HRL
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
vs.
[Re: Docket No. 29]
EQUITY ONE LENDERS GROUP, aka
EQUITY ONE SALES CORPORATION,
aka EQUITY ONE LENDERS
SERVICES, INC., aka
DREAMMAKERS REAL ESTATE
SERVICES INC., aka EQUITY
LENDERS NETWORK INC., aka THE
BARTON FINANCIAL GROUP; JEFF
B. BARTON, an individual, CAMERON
W. BARTON, an individual;
HAMILTON FINANCE, aka
HAMILTON REALTY, an unknown
business entity; BEE LAY TAY, aka BEE
HAMILTON; WELLS FARGO HOME
MORTGAGE, INC., a division of
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.;
E*TRADE MORTGAGE
CORPORATION; BANK OF
AMERICA, N.A. and DOES 1-50,
inclusive,
Defendants
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
November 1, 2011
1:30 p.m.
2
Mag. Judge Howard Lloyd
Complaint Filed: August 15, 2011
Trial Date:
Not Assigned
ORDER
1
2
3
Based upon the stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY
4 ORDERED that the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for November 1, 201 1 be
5 continued to January 10, 2012, 1:30 p.m. All related deadlines are adjusted accordingly.
6
7
8
9
OH
O z
10
OS H
11
£°
12
uJ
l
13
o2
°
"* u
W j
c? <
14
z
•^
H 2
15
W "
16
S 0
as
fcd &
17
a •<
18
H
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Date: October 19, 2011
FEDERAL MAGISTRATE JUDGE
HOWARD R. LLOYD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?