Marcos v. Equity One Lenders Group et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 29 Continuing Case Management Conference. Initial case management conference continued to 1/10/2012, 1:30 PM. All related deadlines adjusted accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/19/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2011)

Download PDF
Roger D. Wintle (SBN 142484) THE H E R I T A G E LAW GROUP, A P.C. *E-FILED 10-19-2011* 152 North Third Street San Jose, California 95112 Tel: (408) 993-2100 Fax: (408) 993-2101 Email: rdw^hlgusa.com Attorneys for Plaintiff: Jaime Marcos 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 o2 10 11 JAIME MARCOS Plaintiff 12 0 y W 13 14 15 •a o 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 5:1 l-CV-04000 HRL [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE vs. [Re: Docket No. 29] EQUITY ONE LENDERS GROUP, aka EQUITY ONE SALES CORPORATION, aka EQUITY ONE LENDERS SERVICES, INC., aka DREAMMAKERS REAL ESTATE SERVICES INC., aka EQUITY LENDERS NETWORK INC., aka THE BARTON FINANCIAL GROUP; JEFF B. BARTON, an individual, CAMERON W. BARTON, an individual; HAMILTON FINANCE, aka HAMILTON REALTY, an unknown business entity; BEE LAY TAY, aka BEE HAMILTON; WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC., a division of WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; E*TRADE MORTGAGE CORPORATION; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: November 1, 2011 1:30 p.m. 2 Mag. Judge Howard Lloyd Complaint Filed: August 15, 2011 Trial Date: Not Assigned ORDER 1 2 3 Based upon the stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY 4 ORDERED that the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for November 1, 201 1 be 5 continued to January 10, 2012, 1:30 p.m. All related deadlines are adjusted accordingly. 6 7 8 9 OH O z 10 OS H 11 £° 12 uJ l 13 o2 ° "* u W j c? < 14 z •^ H 2 15 W " 16 S 0 as fcd & 17 a •< 18 H 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date: October 19, 2011 FEDERAL MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOWARD R. LLOYD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?