City of Royal Oak Retirement System v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 45

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh in case 5:11-cv-04003-LHK; granting (42) Stipulation Temporarily Staying Action.Associated Cases: 5:11-cv-04792-LHK, 5:11-cv-04003-LHK, 5:11-cv-06667-LHK(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2012)

Case5:11-cv-04792-LHK Document42 Filed02/03/12 Page1 of 5

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

NINA F. LOCKER, State Bar No. 123838
[e-mail]
STEVEN GUGGENHEIM, State Bar No. 201386
[e-mail]
JONI OSTLER, State Bar No. 230009
[e-mail]
JESSICA L. SNORGRASS, State Bar No. 259962
[e-mail]
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants Kevin Johnson,
Scott Kriens, Pradeep Sindhu, Robert M. Calderoni,
Mary B. Cranston, John Michael Lawrie,
Stratton Sclavos, William R. Stensrud,
William Meehan, David Schlotterbeck,
Mercedes Johnson, Robyn M. Denholm, and Nominal
Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN JOSE DIVISION

17
18
19

IN RE JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MASTER FILE NO.: 11-CV-4792-LHK

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Master File No. 11-CV-4792-LHK
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TEMPORARILY STAYING
ACTION

Case5:11-cv-04792-LHK Document42 Filed02/03/12 Page2 of 5

Having conferred pursuant to the Court’s Order Proposing a Stay of Proceedings in

1
2

Consolidated Derivative Actions dated January 30, 2012, the parties hereby stipulate and agree,

3

and request that the Court order, as follows:
1.

4

In the interests of efficiency, the above-captioned consolidated shareholder

5

derivative action should be and is hereby stayed until such time as an order is entered denying a

6

motion to dismiss in the related class action City of Royal Oak Retirement System v. Juniper

7

Networks, Inc., et al., Case No. 11-CV-04003-LHK (the “Class Action”);
2.

8
9

The Defendants hereby withdraw their Motion to Proceed in One Forum without

prejudice to Defendants’ rights to renew that motion or to seek a further stay in the event that an

10

order is entered denying a motion to dismiss in the Class Action and the plaintiffs in the

11

currently pending state derivative action captioned In re Juniper Networks, Inc. Shareholder

12

Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. 111CV-207701, are prosecuting or seek to prosecute that

13

action;

14

3.

Any party may, for good cause shown, move the Court to lift the stay at any time;

15

4.

The current deadline to amend the complaint and the motion to dismiss briefing

16

schedule are vacated, and the Case Management Conference scheduled for March 22, 2012 is

17

hereby adjourned;

18

5.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

In the event that an order is entered denying a motion to dismiss in the Class

Action, the following schedule shall apply:
(a)

Plaintiffs shall file their amended complaint within thirty days of the date

the Court issues an order denying in whole or in part a motion to dismiss the Class Action;
(b)

Defendants shall file their motion(s) to dismiss the amended complaint

within thirty days thereafter;
(c)

Plaintiffs shall file their opposition(s) to Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss

thirty days thereafter; and

26

(d)

Defendants shall file their reply(ies) in support of their motion(s) to

27

dismiss within 21 days thereafter.

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MASTER FILE NO.: 11-CV-4792-LHK

1

Case5:11-cv-04792-LHK Document42 Filed02/03/12 Page3 of 5

1

Dated: February 3, 2012

LEVI & KORSINKY, LLP

2
By: s/ Doug Julie
Doug Julie

3
4

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Olga Ratinova and Lisa E.
Coppola, IRA

5
6
7

Dated: February 3, 2012

By: s/ David A. Bain
David A. Bain

8
9

Attorneys for Plaintiff Lisa E. Coppola, IRA

10
11

Dated: February 3, 2012

12

BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER &
BIRKHAEUSER
By: s/ Alan R. Plutzik
Alan R. Plutzik

13
14

2125 Oak Grove Road, Suite 120
Walnut Creek, CA 94598
E-mail: [e-mail]

15
16

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Olga Ratinova and Lisa E.
Coppola, IRA

17
18

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID A. BAIN, LLC

Dated: February 3, 2012

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation

19
20

By: s/ Joni Ostler
Joni Ostler

21

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Juniper Networks,
Inc. and Defendants Kevin Johnson, Scott Kriens,
Pradeep Sindhu, Robert M. Calderoni, Mary B.
Cranston, John Michael Lawrie, Stratton Sclavos,
William R. Stensrud, William Meehan, David
Schlotterbeck, Mercedes Johnson and Robyn M.
Denholm

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MASTER FILE NO.: 11-CV-4792-LHK

2

Case5:11-cv-04792-LHK Document42 Filed02/03/12 Page4 of 5

1

ORDER

2

The above stipulation having been considered, and good cause appearing therefore,

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk shall administratively close the file.
February 6, 2012
DATED: __________________

5
6
__________________________________
THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MASTER FILE NO.: 11-CV-4792-LHK

3