City of Royal Oak Retirement System v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 98

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 97 Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2012)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 2 3 4 CITY OF OMAHA POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and CITY OF 5 BRISTOL PENSION FUND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 6 Plaintiff, 7 No.: 5:11-cv-04003-LHK Before: Hon. Lucy H. Koh vs. JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., SCOTT G. 9 KRIENS, KEVIN R. JOHNSON and ROBYN M. DENHOLM, 10 Defendants. 11 8 STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER 12 13 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the parties to the above-captioned action hereby stipulate to 14 extend the briefing schedule for Defendants’ motion to dismiss by one week. The current 15 briefing schedule is as follows: 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs’ Brief in Opposition: October 15, 2012 Defendants’ Replies: November 1, 2012 The parties respectfully propose the following briefing schedule: 20 Plaintiffs’ Brief in Opposition: October 22, 2012 21 Defendants’ Replies: November 8, 2012 22 SO STIPULATED 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Thomas L. Laughlin IV Thomas L. Laughlin IV SCOTT+SCOTT LLP The Chrysler Building 405 Lexington Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10174 Telephone: 212-223-6444 Facsimile: 212-223-6334 Email: tlaughlin@scott-scott.com Attorney for Plaintiffs No. 5:11-cv-04003-LHK /s/ Joni Ostler Joni Ostler, State Bar No. 230009 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: 650-493-9300 Facsimile: 650-565-5100 Email: jostler@wsgr.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 Attorney for Defendants 7 8 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, this stipulation is supported by the following Declaration of 9 Thomas Laughlin. 10 11 12 13 14 DECLARATION OF THOMAS LAUGHLIN I, Thomas Laughlin, declare: 1. I am an attorney at Scott+Scott LLP, counsel for Plaintiffs in this action. I have the principal responsibility for preparing Plaintiffs’ brief in opposition to Defendants’ motion to 15 dismiss. I make this declaration in support of the parties’ stipulation to extend the briefing 16 schedule for Defendants’ motion to dismiss by one week. 17 2. This is the first request for an extension of time of the briefing schedule for 18 Defendants’ motion to dismiss. 19 20 21 22 3. The parties have stipulated to this extension at my request. Although I have acted with due diligence, several other matters have required my immediate attention in recent weeks, including ongoing discovery in a case in the Eastern District of Michigan, ongoing discovery in a 23 case in the District of Maine and an unexpected motion in a case pending in the Southern District 24 of New York. 25 26 4. The hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss is scheduled for January 31, 2013. Therefore, it does not appear that the requested extension will impact the schedule in this case. 27 28 No. 5:11-cv-04003-LHK 1 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 2 11, 2012 at New York, New York. 3 /s/ Thomas L. Laughlin IV Thomas L. Laughlin IV 4 5 6 7 8 9 SO ORDERED: DATE: ________________ October 12, 2012 10 ____________________________________ Hon. Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge 11 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 13 14 I, Thomas Laughlin, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used 15 to file the foregoing Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 16 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Joni Ostler has concurred in this filing. 17 Dated: October 11, 2012 18 19 20 21 22 23 /s/ Thomas L. Laughlin IV Thomas L. Laughlin IV SCOTT+SCOTT LLP The Chrysler Building 405 Lexington Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10174 Telephone: 212-223-6444 Facsimile: 212-223-6334 Email: tlaughlin@scott-scott.com Attorney for Plaintiffs 24 25 26 27 28 No. 5:11-cv-04003-LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?