Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Panda Express, Inc.

Filing 11

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/13/11. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2011)

Download PDF
** E-filed October 13, 2011 ** UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION CASE NO. CV-11-04021 HRL Plaintiff(s), v. PANDA EXPRESS, INC. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9 Parties will set a mutually-acceptable date after key depositions. other requested deadline _____________________________________________ 10/7/2011 Dated:___________ /s/ Evangelina F. Hernandez ____________________________ Attorney for Plaintiff 10/7/2011 Dated:____________ /s/ Josh A. Gordon (authorized 10/6/11) ____________________________ Attorney for Defendant When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation." [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 9 Mediation X 9 Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 9 90 days from the date of this order. 9 other ___________________ IT IS SO ORDERED. October 13, 2011 Dated:________________ ___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Howard R. Lloyd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?